Rage.Of.Olympus
Senior Member
Originally posted by xJLxKing
Braniac didn't beat Superman. He gave superman info of the upcoming threat...Also, that nobody has no feat yet. To try and downplay him because he has no feat is idiotic. I guess we can start making fun of Antimonitor since he lost to a nobody called Nekron...
What kind of logic is that
You're applying logic, the entire point was that if you warp facts, use incredible bias and do what certain "individuals" do, you can make anyone look bad.
You think if Bendis introduced a brand new character and had him beat the absolute shit out of Thor or a telepath had Thor on his knees, there would be fair and non-bias opinions?
We both know the answer to that question....substitute Thor for Superman in this scan:
https://postimg.cc/image/ez2pionh3/
https://postimg.cc/image/o6uxze293/
We would read for 3 pages, how Thor is really weak, unable to defeat Brainaic with his full strength or even damage him, and had his punch palmed, and was EXPLICITLY (They really love that word) getting overpowered. We'd also read about how weak Brainiac's durability was if telepathy can destroy him. These are such likely arguments, I'd bet money on them.
Everyone teases and trolls, but Philo/Abhiligend/PG have made more Thor related threads in the last few months, than I have in the last two years...
Ftr, I do agree there was context in the Brainiac scene, but I also don't think Superman was in any position of winning atm because he was still defiant, albeit not with the heart he had before.