Legends, Dooku hands down. Better swordsman, way better with the Force.
Canon, I've seen it suggested that canon Maul is actually higher up on the totem pole for lightsaber skill than Dooku (I believe it was in "Absolutely Everything You Need To Know"?). Even with that in mind, I wouldn't put the two that far apart in terms of raw skill, and I'd argue Dooku is still more refined than Maul. And of course, Dooku's mastery of the Force compared to Maul can't be contested. Maul never manifested lightning in Legends or Canon, Dooku has. How much of an advantage Dooku's edge in the Force would give him is tough to determine, but I'd definitely say Dooku gains the overall edge. Something like 6-7/10.
Canon portrays Dooku as a graceful fighter, most effective against other tamed lightsaber forms/fighters. We see what happens when you put his elegant Makashi up against the ferocious and unpredictable fighting styles of Anakin and Vos. Maul is just as, if not more, savage as either of these two fighters.
Originally posted by AncientPower
So, Ben Kenobi has stomped a Rebels Vader tier threat, who during his weakest incarnation (TPM) is canonically greater than Dooku as a lightsaber duelist.In other words, he went from stonewalling Dooku in ROTS to stomping a far greater duelist than Dooku in Rebels.
Disney Canon is wonderful.
Originally posted by Kurk
Canon portrays Dooku as a graceful fighter, most effective against other tamed lightsaber forms/fighters. We see what happens when you put his elegant Makashi up against the ferocious and unpredictable fighting styles of Anakin and Vos. Maul is just as, if not more, savage as either of these two fighters.
Originally posted by AncientPower
So, Ben Kenobi has stomped a Rebels Vader tier threat, who during his weakest incarnation (TPM) is canonically greater than Dooku as a lightsaber duelist.In other words, he went from stonewalling Dooku in ROTS to stomping a far greater duelist than Dooku in Rebels.
Disney Canon is wonderful.