What is more interesting is the different debating skills used in this forum that can be equally effective.
For example, some people look at some of PVS's posts and just react to some of the hostility or jokes and ignore some of the common sense or information that is the root of the post.
Other people overlook some of the excellent posts that Bardock has made and chosen to focus on his sarcasm.
Some people pick appart VVD's grammar instead of reading his well thought out posts that deftly support his arguements.
Different approaches and all can be effective.
I'll just point out that nobody has successfully picked apart VVD's grammar. I don't believe it's possible to, unless he accidentally makes a typo.
Whob has tried a few times...
I agree with most of what you said though. I am of the belief that if you lace a post with blatant hostility you can't really complain about the root being overlooked, but as much as we disagree, PVS has more sense than most of the current dwellers.
-AC
Hahaha, good luck dude. Though I didn't challenge you, I was just stating the obvious. Whob has tried and failed. The only time VVD would have any lapse in grammar is if it's intended. He is never unintentionally wrong.
Originally posted by debbiejo
VVD and AC melds...There must be something very special there...AC seems to always mention VVD's posts..........Whoa....What is it with special relationships.....LOL.......Hmmmm attraction
Hahaha, we happen to know each other but rest assured, there's absolutely no "special" anything there. Anything but. I was just merely pointing out that he has flawless grammar because he does. Who am I to deny that? I'd say the same of anyone else. His zest for applying me to humourous circumstance (even if only for his own benefit) aside, I'm not about to deny anyone anything.
-AC
Originally posted by Alpha CentauriOk then, lets see how long you can go on posting without mentioning VVD as you're little side kick.......Do you need attachements for victory?
Hahaha, good luck dude.Hahaha, we happen to know each other but rest assured, there's absolutely no "special" anything there. Anything but. I was just merely pointing out that he has flawless grammar because he does. Who am I to deny that? I'd say the same of anyone else.
-AC
Originally posted by debbiejo
Ok then, lets see how long you can go on posting without mentioning VVD as you're little side kick.......Do you need attachements for victory?
Well i believe he mentions VVD, cause he is the perfect example for what he is trying to say. And he happens to know him, so what's your point.
Originally posted by Alpha CentauriArguments in the GDF about assisted suicide, the death penalty, abortion, the nature of homosexuality, evolution etcetera with Joes Nobody are as equally inconsequential. The skills and relevancy of posters is also at times questionable.
Precisely.Someone who has honed their skills at arguing with Joe Nobody about Spider-Man will obviously be good at it. When it comes to actually debating people with sense, they may not be. I don't even think some of the people there are good debaters. Pages of irrelevancy to prove points that, half the time, matter none.
At least all the page debates here are relevant.
-AC
If you're looking for exemplary debating skills, KMC isn't the best place in the world to start.
Originally posted by Alpha CentauriWhy must you mention him in relation to your views.?? I wonder..Is is insecurity and need a side Kick....No one else mentions others when it comes to their views....just wondering...
Side kick? We're barely acquaintances. We just know each other. I'm giving him the credit where it's due.Why must you continue to fill threads with your bs?
-AC
Originally posted by debbiejo
Ok then, lets see how long you can go on posting without mentioning VVD as you're little side kick.......Do you need attachements for victory?
I don't see anyone thinking that VVD is AC's sidekick. Although I do agree AC often seems to look for acceptance from VVD, I do know there is not much love between them.
Go fishing for better examples Debbie, you're crapping out with this one.
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
I'll just point out that nobody has successfully picked apart VVD's grammar. I don't believe it's possible to, unless he accidentally makes a typo.Whob has tried a few times...
I agree with most of what you said though. I am of the belief that if you lace a post with blatant hostility you can't really complain about the root being overlooked, but as much as we disagree, PVS has more sense than most of the current dwellers.
-AC
Haha, I remember that attempt. He IMed me asking exactly how ridiculous I thought that whole little arguement was, and I laughed.
Then again, the same person who attempted that also thinks that 'relevant' is not a meaning of 'valid'.
Hahaha, acceptance from VVD. Funny. He's the last person I'll look for acceptance from. I know him in real life and there are a great many times, most infact, that I wish I did not.
Originally posted by debbiejo
Why must you mention him in relation to your views.?? I wonder..Is is insecurity and need a side Kick....No one else mentions others when it comes to their views....just wondering...
Because KharmaDog humourously mentioned him, so I tagged something onto that (it was relevant) and you chose to remain in idiot mode as you always do. Once again dragging things to where they needn't be. Now, I don't wanna have to report you a fourth time.
-AC