Which Forum has the best debaters ?

Originally posted by KharmaDog
I don't see anyone thinking that VVD is AC's sidekick. Although I do agree AC often seems to look for acceptance from VVD, I do know there is not much love between them.

Go fishing for better examples Debbie, you're crapping out with this one.

Originally posted by debbiejo
Fishing and found a hook...No one else mentions fellow posters as much as AC...Why would some one feeling content with their own view even have to mention constantly of others to feel their view is straight out right.....sounds to me as insecurity....just my reading on physiological behaviors.

Yeeeaaaah I'd say you're wrong, though.

She has a point. Few members feel the need to drop the name of other users in so many of their posts.

I don't constantly mention anyone. The only time I mention HIM is in conjunction with something that has happened before. I'm not one to deny credit where it's due. I'd do the same for anyone. Not quite sure what you're trying to get at.

Well, I am. Just makes no sense. Infact, I'm sure VVD himself would agree that I, at most times, would prefer to be as non-affiliated with him as possible. Regardless, I know me better than you do, and you're off-point. You jumped and continued falling.

-AC

Originally posted by Lana
Yeeeaaaah I'd say you're wrong, though.

Yes, let's go by Debbiejo studies...

-AC

Originally posted by Lana
Yeeeaaaah I'd say you're wrong, though.

bill lumberg?

😛

mmmmmmkay? THAAAAAAANKS!!! *sips coffee*

Hmm interesting, I don't notice that as often, someone doesn't want to debate so they focus on something in a post of their opponennt and interpret it (usually wrong) ....no wait, that happens a lot.

Originally posted by PVS
bill lumberg?

😛

mmmmmmkay? THAAAAAAANKS!!! *sips coffee*

😕

That was just me being me 😛

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
I don't constantly mention anyone. The only time I mention HIM is in conjunction with something that has happened before. I'm not one to deny credit where it's due. I'd do the same for anyone. Not quite sure what you're trying to get at.

Well, I am. Just makes no sense. Infact, I'm sure VVD himself would agree that I, at most times, would prefer to be as non-affiliated with him as possible. Regardless, I know me better than you do, and you're off-point. You jumped and continued falling.

-AC

Originally posted by debbiejo
See, you have to mention him again...

You're clutching at straws, hoping to grab the long one....and failing.

Originally posted by debbiejo
See, you have to mention him again...

Originally posted by debbiejo
See, you have to mention him again...

Think about the logic of this comment.

Scratch that. My new request is: Think.

-AC

Originally posted by Bardock42
Hmm interesting, I don't notice that as often, someone doesn't want to debate so they focus on something in a post of their opponennt and interpret it (usually wrong) ....no wait, that happens a lot.

Originally posted by xmarksthespot
Opponent. 😄

I knew there was something wrong with it, I thought it was somethin with the "n"s though. Oh well. Happens to the best of us (me)

Originally posted by Bardock42
Hmm interesting, I don't notice that as often, someone doesn't want to debate so they focus on something in a post of their opponennt and interpret it (usually wrong) ....no wait, that happens a lot.

its constant and its so ****ing annoying.

Originally posted by Bardock42
opponennt

also what annoys me is when people read the first sentence of your post and just run with it, rather than read the entire post and realise that the initial sentence was an opening statement, followed by the body of text which supports that opening statement, and holds the answers to whatever stupid questions they ask, forcing you to quote a sentence in your own post, which saddly is also contained in their quote of your post. that gets me steamed

If someone is soooo successful there is no need for even mentioning anyone else to supposed their views. If a person it not feeling successful they will pull in others to emulate them...It's only common physcology.

Originally posted by PVS
its constant and its so ****ing annoying.

LOLZZZZZ YOU SPELLED THAT WRONG!!111

also what annoys me is when people read the first sentence of your post and just run with it, rather than read the entire post and realise that the initial sentence was an opening statement, followed by the body of text which supports that opening statement, and holds the answers to whatever stupid questions they ask, forcing you to quote a sentence in your own post, which saddly is also contained in their quote of your post. that gets me steamed

Yeah, that is incredibly irritating.

Though not so much as the "I'm only going to read the thread title and comment on that" thing that a certain someone that we all knew and loved (loathed?) did.

Originally posted by debbiejo
If someone is soooo successful there is no need for even mentioning anyone else to supposed their views. If a person it not feeling successful they will pull in others to emulate them...It's only common physcology.

Just go to the OTF, debbiejo. Go on.

-AC

Originally posted by debbiejo
If someone is soooo successful there is no need for even mentioning anyone else to supposed their views. If a person it not feeling successful they will pull in others to emulate them...It's only common physcology.

Okay let me get that straight

AC: VVD has usually a rather excellent grammar (he does indeed)

Debbie: You mentioned VVD, you are obsessed with him

AC: I am not obsessed with VVD

Debbie: See you mentioned him again, I win....pawnzzor the bigoneone 111!!!!11

🤨