Originally posted by Arachnoidfreak
No, you're just stupid.
What's up with the insults can't we have an intelligent debate?
Originally posted by ArachnoidfreakDuh it's called Neo-Darwinsim now.Stop calling it 'Darwinism'. Any of his findings that were incorrect have been thrown out, and replaced with newer, more complete information.
Originally posted by Arachnoidfreak
Mutations can be anything. There was a baby born who had a mutation which made his muscle density something like 10 times more dense than an average person's. They found that all the men in his family were unusually strong. Doctors say the baby is perfectly healthy otherwise.
How is that an addition of new traits?
Evolution claims that random mutations created diversty in life how can mutations do that when they can't even create new traits?
EDIT: Oh and that baby having dense muscles isn't a mutation it's a gentic variation not all people have the same muscle structure.
Originally posted by Captain Falcon😆 Is that your only rebuttal
If you understand evolution properly you would think it makes sense. Infact, everything would become clear too you if you understand evolution properly.
"I don't understand Evolution" How lame, You haven't debated me once you just hide behind someone who thinks they know what they're talking about and throw insults how lame.
Answer me this according to darwinist quadrupeds originated from fish in the sea, Now in order for a fish to adapt to a land habitat it would have to go major modifictions. It's respritory, Excretory and skeletal systems would have to change. Gills would have to change into lungs and Fins would have to become feet to carry the weight of the body and the skin would have to acquire new texture to prevent water loss unless all these things happen fish would survive only a few minutes on land.
It would have to go to major changes or else it wouldn't survive, It could not gradually adapt because Organs cannot work if there incomplete.
Originally posted by Blue nocturneAre you making shit up as you go along? I think I know the answer to that. Please...
😆 Is that your only rebuttal"I don't understand Evolution" How lame, You haven't debated me once you just hide behind someone who thinks they know what they're talking about and throw insults how lame.
READ A ****ING BOOK.
Here's a great way to tell the difference between GOOD SCIENCE (evolution) and NON-SCIENCE (creationism/intelligent design)
good sciences changes as we learn more. It goes into a sequence of: observation, hypothesis, testing and debate.
non-science is rigid. It goes into a sequence of: fiction, asserting, insisting, TWISTING THE FACTS and even TORTURING those who disagree.
get it?
Originally posted by Blue nocturne
Answer me this according to darwinist quadrupeds originated from fish in the sea, Now in order for a fish to adapt to a land habitat it would have to go major modifictions. It's respritory, Excretory and skeletal systems would have to change. Gills would have to change into lungs and Fins would have to become feet to carry the weight of the body and the skin would have to acquire new texture to prevent water loss unless all these things happen fish would survive only a few minutes on land.
It would have to go to major changes or else it wouldn't survive, It could not gradually adapt because Organs cannot work if there incomplete.
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Knowing something can close the mind to learning something. You have a belief that evolution does not agree with, that is why you fight against it.
Evolution makes no sense I already explained why, Mutations adding new traits to the gene pool is has never been observed so far,no one has given me any proof just some links to sites, I on the other hand pretty much posted a bunch of arguements that everyone either ignored or link me to some sight that doesn't answer my questions then they accuse me of ignoring there post when I responded to all of them, These guy's are waste to debate and evolution doesn't hold up.
Originally posted by Blue nocturne
Evolution makes no sense I already explained why, Mutations adding new traits to the gene pool is has never been observed so far,no one has given me any proof just some links to sites, I on the other hand pretty much posted a bunch of arguements that everyone either ignored or link me to some sight that doesn't answer my questions then they accuse me of ignoring there post when I responded to all of them, These guy's are waste to debate and evolution doesn't hold up.
You make it that way in your own mind. I have read all of this, and I would say you are actively ignoring.
Originally posted by Blue nocturne
It's funny everytime I would post an argument someone would just link me a site and insult me, I answerd there questions yet they ignored mine yet, I'm ignoring facts I read most of their links and it didn't even answer my question.
There was plenty of that, and I wish people would stop insulting and just posting links, but there have been some people who have posted you the facts they know and you have just replied that it doesn't make sense to you. The truth does not have to make sense to you; it has to hold up to scientific scrutiny.
Originally posted by Wesker
No, you're wrong. Evolution DOES make sense given the evidence, and it does NOT take faith to accept it as the best current theory.
Wesker type some facts ( Please do not link me to a site) About evolution and I'll show you my point yuo don't have to agree just post some evidence in favor of evolution.