Reasons Why God "can" Not Exist And Why All Relegions Are Inherently Flawed

Started by debbiejo7 pages

E=5934844]Originally posted by Shakyamunison
I was translating. Some people can't understand you. 😆 jk [/QUOTE] Really???.........Oh that would explain many things about me.......people just don't understand me for sure.....Don't even understand my jokes......... 🤨 ..........and looking for something that's just not there...................Me always angelic... 😇 ........Well, at least truthful, integreity and giving respect where respect is due to others...Treating others how I'd like to be treated............Most people aren't like me............

Originally posted by debbiejo
........Well, at least truthful as compared to others.

😱 😱 😱 😱 😱 😱 😱 😱

😂 ................It's true..........I'm so damn something...........damn damn damn................Oh my god.....I'm not of this world.!!!!!!!!!

Originally posted by Atlantis001
God is only omnipotent in this physical reality which he created. Omnipotence would be a consequence of being greater than this physical reality where we exist in. Omnipotence is only real to those inside that reality. The situation is analogous to an history that you imagine in your head. For the characters of your history, your imagination is omnipotent as you can imagine whatever you want to, and you are omniscient since all events must be imagined by you. But outside your imagination you are not omnipotent. What means that no paradoxes can be made from that, and what was to be expected since the situation used in the analogy is real, and it would be weird to see paradoxes in a real situation.

so if u created a robot and programmed it to follow any instrucion without fail would that make u OMNIPOTENT over it? or would it simply give u power over it? i say the later. omnipotent means all powerful, n not sum1 that has complete power over a limited numbre of things.

GOD EXISTS

Originally posted by JaehSkywalker
[b]GOD EXISTS [/B]

WOW, that sure proved me wrong 😎

i'm not trying to prove you wrong coz you typed what i wanted to say about omnipotent...

yup...

GOD EXISTS
only in your mind

how about the mind of others?

Originally posted by leonheartmm
so if u created a robot and programmed it to follow any instrucion without fail would that make u OMNIPOTENT over it? or would it simply give u power over it? i say the later. omnipotent means all powerful, n not sum1 that has complete power over a limited numbre of things.

It would make you omnipotent to those who are inside that particular universe. You can only say that it will just give you limited power over the robot if you assume the existence of a reality beyond that particular universe. I mean... if the only reality was the robot, then I would be omnipotent.

P.S.: Note that in the way I tryied to solve this problem, those paradoxes are still not possible. I mean... I don´t believe that God could kill itself, create another "omnipotent" God....

I Think religions are very successful despite some of their childish nature of many teachings. They offer the ego an assurance. The "Tell me I'm OK. Tell me I'm right. Tell me I'm special. Tell me I'm accepted by others. Define me through your observation of me." In this way religions fill in the gap, and people feel accepted.

We of this religion are separate and distanced ourselves from the rest of humanity whose destiny it is to be lost in the fires of hell...

how about the mind of others?
in the mind of man, the ones that cant face reality without having a place to escape to, sanctuary of a child yet as adults

That ego thing can be very problematic, many people just expect spiritual comfort from religions, and probably because they do not feel so spiritually evolved. They do not expect do dedicate themselves to their spirituality, but to hear some comfort words about what they do and how they live.

You can't use logic or reasoning to prove god exists... nor can you use it to prove he doesn't.

Until there is cold hard facts that hes there or not there will always be doubt/belief on both sides...

Which god are you talking about?

burden of proof lies on those who says god exist.
All non believers have to say is that god doesnt exsit and you cant proof the non existing................ the existing though is a totally different matter

Originally posted by finti
burden of proof lies on those who says god exist.

Not a burden at all. God exists and His existance is evident in everything around us. No proof is needed. It is all around us. Just because He does not exist for you because you choose to believe so does not require anyone to come up with proof. Open your eyes!

wavey

Hi sonnet........long time, no post....

Hope you brought some raw meat!!!

Originally posted by Hit_and_Miss
You can't use logic or reasoning to prove god exists... nor can you use it to prove he doesn't.

Until there is cold hard facts that hes there or not there will always be doubt/belief on both sides...

Yes, but that don´t make God so different than any other thing. For example, you can´t use reasoning to prove logic. All you can do is to believe in it, assume that it is real.

god is real