Classic Beyonder runs the ultimate gauntlet

Originally posted by GalacticStorm
Complete rubbish and me and you both know it. 😉

He said "this entity Rachels power" hes referring to Rachel. He likens her and her power to a newborn star and then from that point on goes to refer to her as starsoul/childe on a number of occassions.

Nowhere is the Phoenix Force mentioned. That is an unsupported assumption of yours that you have no reason for making. Good try. Beyonder was talking about Rachel, the "limited" host.

Which is why and which makes sense, she is Potentially the most like him, only if she had the Full Force of the Phoenix, Thanks again mate.

Originally posted by Mr Master
Let me get to this one right away, why is that naive to think that he could do that many times over and as many times as he wished? I mean for crying out loud the Beyonder had the combined Power of everything in the Marvel Multiverse(yes at the time)Millions of times over, what's the destruction of one Multiverse when you have the power of that same Multiverse in it's entirety Millions of Times Over.

You may not except that but on this one you loose if you deny this to be a fact.

PROOF!

Its stupid because its like saying Silver Surfer has the power to blow up the planet when fully unleashed so that must mean every destructive output from him whose scale isnt specified on panel must have destroyed the planet. 😉

Theres nothing on panel to tell us that statement isnt hyperbole. I will use the aforementioned example again. Every time a peak human character is stated to have attacked with lightning speed, does that mean they literally moved at a third of the speed of light? 😕

Of course NOT 😂

Beyonder never did anything on panel to show conclusively that that comment was anything but hyperbole. On top of that characters who have never had anything like that said about them have performed better feats than hes been shown to do on panel. Inconclusive. Sorry mate. 🙁

Originally posted by GalacticStorm
This scene verifies Beyonders own comments about Rachels potential and her being the power closest to his own. What that says about Jean who literally is the Force i'll leave for you to contemplate. [/B]

Yea rachel is really close to the Beyonder: Even you gotta be pissing in your pant's right now, This is Rachel using all the Power in her system to attack the Beyonder. Wow pretty impressive.

This what happens when Rachel uses all of her power to attack the Beyonder.

Originally posted by Mr Master
Never says "liken", clearly says AKIN, which means to be related to. Thank You Mate.

She's related to a young star that's just begun to grow.

See, you don't know it all, and in one word you twist the story to cater to your beliefs, but I have your dictionary link you like to post at people, so blame yourself, LOL.

This is the most useless ost i have ever come across in my time as a member 😂

Akin also means similar to. So him saying shes akin to a newborn star means the same thing as him likening her to a newborn star. The point is he's highlighting a similar quality. Either way what relevance does this have? He still refers to her power level being extraordinary and says shes potentially most like him. Stop nitpicking at my wording and focus on saving your mess of an argument. 😱

Originally posted by GalacticStorm
Its stupid because its like saying Silver Surfer has the power to blow up the planet when fully unleashed so that must mean every destructive output from him whose scale isnt specified on panel must have destroyed the planet. 😉

Theres nothing on panel to tell us that statement isnt hyperbole. I will use the aforementioned example again. Every time a peak human character is stated to have attacked with lightning speed, does that mean they literally moved at a third of the speed of light? 😕

Of course NOT 😂

Beyonder never did anything on panel to show conclusively that that comment was anything but hyperbole. On top of that characters who have never had anything like that said about them have performed better feats than hes been shown to do on panel. Inconclusive. Sorry mate. 🙁

Explain it, twist it, convert it as you will, on this one you must be ignored, because your being shown proof and you won't except, this is not him saying it, this is the narrator/writer, which has authority over characters just like the one that wrote about Phoenix being so poweful and being the beginning and ending of all things.

So don't play yourself with hyperbole nonsense, it's a fact, except it, now your using opinions and assumptions to demean the fact, this is something your always preaching against in all threads your involved in, so don't do it yourself.

Originally posted by Mr Master
Which is why and which makes sense, she is Potentially the most like him, only if she had the Full Force of the Phoenix, Thanks again mate.

Youre making an assumption there. Not good enough and unsupported. For all we know it wouldnt take the full power of the Force, Rachel can never harness the full power of the Force as she is only human so youre wrong there mate. No speculation, lets deal wiv the facts please. 🙂

Originally posted by Mr Master
This what happens when Rachel uses all of her power to attack the Beyonder.

And your point is? 😕

This is the same Rachel who as stated only has very limited access to the Force, the same Rachel who despite this impressed the Beyonder who said she was the being most like him out of those encountered. This was the same Rachel who despite being the inferior Phoenix gave Beyonder an insight into what she represents and left him baffled. 😂

http://putfile.com/pic.php?pic=3/8807194683.jpg&s=x11

Your point is void. 🙁

Originally posted by GalacticStorm
This is the most useless ost i have ever come across in my time as a member 😂

Akin also means similar to. So him saying shes akin to a newborn star means the same thing as him likening her to a newborn star. The point is he's highlighting a similar quality. Either way what relevance does this have? He still refers to her power level being extraordinary and says shes potentially most like him. Stop nitpicking at my wording and focus on saving your mess of an argument. 😱

What I get from that scan is he's is talking about the Phoenix Force, because he say's and points out specifically "This Entity Rachel's power is extraordinary"
If he's talking about just Rachel why would he have to say "This Entity Rachel's pwer, why didn't he just say This Entity Rachel, has extraordinary power, or simply Rachel has extraordinary power, no, he say's This Entity Rachel's power is extraordinary, which logically means the Entity which is Rachel's power(Phoenix Force)is extraordinary.

Ey atleast it's not in plain text and diputed like Beyonder being Millions of Times more Powerful than All the Power in the Multiverse Combine, that's plain and simple and you tried to dispute it.

Originally posted by Mr Master
Explain it, twist it, convert it as you will, on this one you must be ignored, because your being shown proof and you won't except, this is not him saying it, this is the narrator/writer, which has authority over characters just like the one that wrote about Phoenix being so poweful and being the beginning and ending of all things.

So don't play yourself with hyperbole nonsense, it's a fact, except it, now your using opinions and assumptions to demean the fact, this is something your always preaching against in all threads your involved in, so don't do it yourself.

Blah blah blah 😂

Dont play myself? Ive been shown proof have I? 😕

Im sorry can you show me where on panel Beyonder conclusively showed he has power a million times that of the marvel multiverse?

A million times the power of the multiverse and yet it took half of his power to get rid of Death? 😕

I rest my case. 😄

Originally posted by GalacticStorm
And your point is? 😕

This is the same Rachel who as stated only has very limited access to the Force, the same Rachel who despite this impressed the Beyonder who said she was the being most like him out of those encountered. This was the same Rachel who despite being the inferior Phoenix gave Beyonder an insight into what she represents and left him baffled. 😂

http://putfile.com/pic.php?pic=3/8807194683.jpg&s=x11

Your point is void. 🙁

My point is that your claiming Rachel somehow impressed Beyonder, but I know he's talking about the Phoenix's Full Power Potential, because on her current power level she's a joke to him.

And the continuation to that:

She's a joke.

Originally posted by Mr Master
What I get from that scan is he's is talking about the Phoenix Force, because he say's and points out specifically "This Entity Rachel's power is extraordinary"
If he's talking about just Rachel why would he have to say "This Entity Rachel's pwer, why didn't he just say This Entity Rachel, has extraordinary power, or simply Rachel has extraordinary power, no, he say's This Entity Rachel's power is extraordinary, which logically means the Entity which is Rachel's power(Phoenix Force)is extraordinary.

What a load. 😂 The Beyonders says "this entity Rachels power", he makes no reference to another entity hes just talking about Rachel the on panel depiction is of Beyonder watching Rachel employ her power. Nuff said. 😉

Originally posted by Mr Master
Ey atleast it's not in plain text and diputed like Beyonder being Millions of Times more Powerful than All the Power in the Multiverse Combine, that's plain and simple and you tried to dispute it.

And yet no show of power from Beyonder certified this comment. There was nothing from him that couldnt have been done by other powers and there are power displays from other powers that are beyond anything he's done. Inconclusive my friend and for that i apologise. 🙁

Originally posted by Mr Master
My point is that your claiming Rachel somehow impressed Beyonder, but I know he's talking about the Phoenix's Full Power Potential, because on her current power level she's a joke to him.

Of course she was. At that point she'd just started tapping into the power, she was limited, which is in line with Beyonders comments about her being a newborn star thats only just begun to shine.

In the beginning Rachel was just a very powerful mutant in terms of power displays she went on to tap into more of her power at the end of her run as a Phoenix in line with Beyonders comments about her potentially being the most like him.

Its all about potential. At the point she faced him she was nowhere near powerful enough however he could see the potential in her. Despite that Rachel the limited host gave Beyonder an insight into what shes connected with, what she represents and he was left dumbstruck 😱

Jean the Phoenix Force in human form is a completely different story. 😉

Originally posted by GalacticStorm
Blah blah blah 😂

Dont play myself? Ive been shown proof have I? 😕

Im sorry can you show me where on panel Beyonder conclusively showed he has power a million times that of the marvel multiverse?

A million times the power of the multiverse and yet it took half of his power to get rid of Death? 😕

I rest my case. 😄

Half his power? Don't know where you got that from, but I'm not surprised you made it up, when you don't know what the heck your talking about you improvise.

He used alot of his power but I have the comic open as I write and I don't see half of anything, what I do see is that no matter how much it took to kill The Multiversal Concept of Death, he still had more power than the Multiverse Combinde, that's what incredible about the beyonder,

and ofcourse Proof:

And continue:

Originally posted by Mr Master
And the continuation to that:

She's a joke.

Posting pics of Rachel getting choked out is futile. It will get you nowhere, especially in light of the fact that she had just received her power and as stated had limited acces to the Force, that despite this Beyonder saw her potential and said when reached she'd be most like him. Rachel at full potential is still no Jean, she is still a human whereas as Jean right from the beginning was just Phoenix in physical form. Beyonder got an insight into the Phoenix Force and had to take a timeout. 😂

And to prove it's the Multiversal Concept of Death not the Universal:

Originally posted by Mr Master
Half his power? Don't know where you got that from, but I'm not surprised you made it up, when you don't know what the heck your talking about you improvise.

He used alot of his power but I have the comic open as I write and I don't see half of anything,

He stated that he used alot of his power. The fact is that he poured so much into it that he didnt have enough left to reverse the action if it was taken. That tells you that it was at least half if anything it was more in light of that 😂

[QUOTE=6285684]Originally posted by GalacticStorm
[B]What a load. 😂 The Beyonders says "this entity Rachels power", he makes no reference to another entity hes just talking about Rachel the on panel depiction is of Beyonder watching Rachel employ her power. Nuff said. 😉

So now Rachel is her own power, she doesn't derive this power from Phoenix the Force, even if it's a limited amount she can draw?

Honestly though as much as it hurts to be wrong, you telling me that you understand "This Entity Rachel's power is extrairdinary" ashim talking about just Rachel, or do does your pride blind you so that you do not see in fact, "This Entity Rachel's power" as it being a seperate Entity which is obviously Rachel's power?

Come on are you serious? Or are you being obtuse again, no offense,
but by not excepting the fact that Beyonder is Millions of Times more Powerful than the Multiverse Combined, although it was on panel, you've forced me to believe when your proven wrong you become stubborn and irrational.