NAMBLA

Originally posted by Imperial_Samura
Actually any comprehensive biology text book that has a section on the human physiognomy and anatomy will make references, when dealing with the reproductive system, to erogenous zones such as listed by Hit_and_Miss. I didn't see anything graphic or erotic or whatever in what was posted, just seemed like the facts were being put forward to add context to an earlier question (of why did God make it so enjoyable if it's wrong?)

Funny most Biology books don't list erogenous zones in my experience, I have just checked Stryer - nope nothing there. I think your confused with a sex manual.

http://www.cirp.org/library/anatomy/winkelmann/

"A great unity exists in the forms of innervation of the several true erogenous zones in any animal. In primates the ending appears to be principally nonmyelinated nerve, while in the lower animals the ending is convoluted and heavily encapulated. The single exception of the nipple region is adequately explained by the anatomy of that region. Compared with lower animals, the primate group is much better equipped to appreciate sensations in special tactile zones such as the hand, as well as in the erogenous zones."

"These end-organs develop principally after fetal life. No adequate knowledge of true relations exists, but it is apparent that most significant morphological changes occur after several or many years of organized extrauterine life. This would fit well with the basic psychiatric concept of oral, anal, and genital eras in man's psychic development. We do not know that such a progressive morphological organization of cutaneous nerves occurs but in view of the organized behavior patterns, it would be logical to look for it. Much behavior is readily explicable on the basis of an identity of the oral, anal, and genital regions in regard to nerve supply. It is now confirmed that such a peripheral sensory identity does exist."

Originally posted by PVS
http://www.cirp.org/library/anatomy/winkelmann/

Not a reputable text book your point is? Certainly not on any course I've heard off it's from a specialist clinic in 1959 PVS. It also seems to be the notes from a meeting. Strange thing to be looking at I must say. It's certainly not like Stryer or any standard text. 🙂 Seems to be a piece of specialist research. Obviously that happens. I suspect it's a route that might interest H and M.

"The Circumcision Information and Resource Pages are an Internet
resource that provide you with information about all aspects of
the genital surgery known as circumcision.

CIRP is essentially divided into two parts:
The Circumcision Reference Library contains technical material,
medical and historical articles, and statistics.
The Circumcision Information Pages contain a more
readable collection of information, suitable for parents and educators.

This site has links to information on the rights of the child,
religious issues, and related issues."

oh yes, its all part of their greater agenda to circumcise the globe.
at least research the site before you cry propaganda 😬

Originally posted by PVS
"The Circumcision Information and Resource Pages are an Internet
resource that provide you with information about all aspects of
the genital surgery known as circumcision.

CIRP is essentially divided into two parts:
The Circumcision Reference Library contains technical material,
medical and historical articles, and statistics.
The Circumcision Information Pages contain a more
readable collection of information, suitable for parents and educators.

This site has links to information on the rights of the child,
religious issues, and related issues."

oh yes, its all part of their greater agenda to circumcise the globe.
at least research the site before you cry propaganda 😬

Out of interest

The Circumcision Information Pages contain a more
readable collection of information, suitable for parents and educators.

who decided this if the information is from 1959 I don't see its relevance. 🙂

Originally posted by Sir Whirlysplat
Funny most Biology books don't list erogenous zones in my experience, I have just checked Stryer - nope nothing there. I think your confused with a sex manual.

I believe most schools have Sexual education.... and what I quoted said little more then the fact that the prostate can be stimulated, and not by normal straight sex.... It was addressing whob... Perhaps you would like to give an answer to the question I asked earlier???

or you could just keep derailing the thread with flaming posts!

Originally posted by Hit_and_Miss
I believe most schools have Sexual education....

If the parents wish the child to hear it, many do not - written consent is required in the UK right up to 16 it's the same in Science lessons where reproduction is discussed.

if something has been proven to exist in 1959, then it needs to be updated in some benign already proven anatomy study...or it doesnt exist. ok whirley, can you please produce studies from within the past decade which prove that the moon is not made of green cheese?
oh and dont post any of that apollo mission crap, because its so outdaded

Originally posted by PVS
if something has been proven to exist in 1959, then it needs to be updated in some benign already proven anatomy study...or it doesnt exist. ok whirley, can you please produce studies from within the past decade which prove that the moon is not made of green cheese?
oh and dont post any of that apollo mission crap, because its so outdaded

Actually though most reputable sites would not use meeting notes from 1959 though 😉 and not from the "MAyo" clinic "Kings College" "Harvard" yup, the Mayo clinic meeting notes 1959 ❌

Originally posted by Sir Whirlysplat
Actually though most reputable sites would not use meeting notes from 1959 though 😉

ok whirley, produce evidence that arrousal is impossible through use of erogeonous zones, or that they in fact dont exist. we'll take it from there.

Originally posted by PVS
ok whirley, produce evidence that arrousal is impossible through use of erogeonous zose, or that they in fact dont exist. we'll take it from there.

Of course it's possible and of course thats whats going on 🙂 Thats not what's being discussed by me, The Joy of Sex covers it if you want an up to date source.

Originally posted by Sir Whirlysplat
Of course it's possible and of course thats whats going on 🙂 Thats not what's being discussed by me, The Joy of Sex covers it if you want an up to date source.

????

did you just avoid my question and throw in
more smilie tagged sarcasm in place of a straight
answer?

Originally posted by PVS
????

did you just avoid my question and throw in
more smilie tagged sarcasm in place of a straight
answer?

No I told you that it's obviously correct information, but not a text book on any school course. Sort of joining two posts together with that one and actually I wasn't being sarcastic. I do though think the source is not one that would be used in any school. The Joy of sex is a bit more up to date, not that it would be used in a school either, no one disputes erogenous zones. Is going into them in detail pg 13 though? If you are not the parent giving guidance?

Originally posted by Sir Whirlysplat
No I told you that it's obviously correct information, but not a text book on any school course. Sort of joining two posts together with that one and actually I wasn't being sarcastic. I do though think the source is not one that would be used in any school. The Joy of sex is a bit more up to date, not that it would be used in a school either, no one disputes erogenous zones. Is going into them in detail pg 13 though? If you are not the parent giving guidance?

well, apparently the raping of children is a suitable topic (thus this thread). why is that not disputed? but when evidence against homophobia comes up, then its time to bring in Captain Morality.

Originally posted by PVS
well, apparently the raping of children is a suitable topic (thus this thread). why is that not disputed? but when evidence against homophobia comes up, then its time to bring in Captain Morality.

Actually I don't think anything about this thread is suitable and I made that comment many pages back.

Originally posted by whobdamandog
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_Man-Boy_Love_Association

Seeing how there's been a great resurgence of people posting in the

"Homosexuality..Chosen or Genetic thread," I though it might be interesting to see what you guys thought about these guys.

And let's try to keep this thread clean, and not bash anyone.

What a bunch of sick pedophiles. 😠

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
There's such an overwhelming amount of insecure homophobia on KMC, increasing by the minute.

Why is it called homophobia? Phobia means "Fear", and there's a big difference between being afraid of someone and despising them.

NAMBLA should be hunted down and shot dead.

I agree, there is no place in society for sick people like these.

Originally posted by Makedde
I agree, there is no place in society for sick people like these.

While I agree that there acts and what they stand for is wrong, Shouldn't we try to treat them like we treat all mentality ill people??? Someone has already posted that pedophilia is a mental illness....