There only linked in the fact that a boy is the same sex as a grown man, I would say Homosexuals Find Men attractive, Not small boys, In the same way Straight people Find Women attractive, Not small girls.
What your proposing is that Homosexuals Find Men attractive so they must find Boys attractive. I seriously Doubt a Homosexual would bed a man if he found out he was below the age of consent, Where as a Nambla Member seeks out ONLY those below the age of consent.
Originally posted by Hit_and_Miss
There only linked in the fact that a boy is the same sex as a grown man, I would say Homosexuals Find Men attractive, Not small boys, In the same way Straight people Find Women attractive, Not small girls.
Question for H amd M: as someone who hangs round the Welcome thread and OTF a fair bit what do you consider "a little girl"?
Saying hello and joking is one thing, Trying to bed someone below the age of consent is another, Personally I wouldn't go near anything below the age of 17.
Though I would ask, Are all your comic-book groupies above this age??? 😉
thou Should I not say hello to any of the new members? And posting in the OTF doesn't quailfy me as a sex thread addict...
ok, what have we learned here?
a man who rapes a little boy is a homosexual
and a man who raped a little girl is a heterosexual.
is that it? for whob it seems to be...but anyone else? no? ok how about this:
homosexuality is a mental disorder related to paedophelia. more 'advanced' homosexuals progress to raping children. men who rape little girls are in fact homosexual, just that they have advanced even farther than the standard peadophile.
is that the brown nugget you're trying to dig up? please enlighten me.
please. decode the speech, and say what you mean. because this is getting stale.
Originally posted by Hit_and_Miss
Saying hello and joking is one thing, Trying to bed someone below the age of consent is another, Personally I wouldn't go near anything below the age of 17.
It's legal at 16 and you're what 19 thats OK surely as low as 15, At 19 I knew 15 year old girls a bit.
QUOTE=6026722]Originally posted by Hit_and_Miss
Though I would ask, Are all your comic-book groupies above this age??? 😉
[/QUOTE]
The comic book forum has probably the oldest membership on a regular basis and also probably the youngest except for Video games and Anime which are also very young.
QUOTE=6026722]Originally posted by Hit_and_Miss
thou Should I not say hello to any of the new members?[/QUOTE]
Of course not
QUOTE=6026722]Originally posted by Hit_and_Miss
And posting in the OTF doesn't quailfy me as a sex thread addict... [/QUOTE]
Well most of them in the OTF do seem to be obsessed by sex 🙂
Originally posted by Hit_and_Miss19yrs??? I'm 20... Going on 21 in less then a month...
On a side note... "knowing" 15yr olds at 19??? Shame on you whirly! 😛
Almost 21 😉 good for you pal 🙂
Oh yes I knew some 15 year old girls at 19, one I am still in touch with she's well into her 30's now with a 12 year old daughter.
Originally posted by PVS
ok, what have we learned here?
You tell me..😉
Originally posted by PVS
a man who rapes a little boy is a homosexual
It took you more than a post to figure that out...😉 😆
Originally posted by PVS
and a man who raped a little girl is a heterosexual.
Yes..but he's not on the same level of perversion as the homosexual paedophile..at least according to nature.
ie: nature = "male + female" not "man + man"
Originally posted by PVS
is that it? for whob it seems to be...
Well you forgot to mention that there are different levels to "obscenity", some "obscene" behavior..is far more perverse than others.
ie: A man who rapes a 2 year old, is much more "perverse" than a man who rapes a 20 year old.
Originally posted by PVS
homosexuality is a mental disorder related to paedophelia.
Often times it is..did you even read the wiki article about NAMBLA..it was founded by a division of a "Gay Rights" group. Believe it or not, it's actually supported by various segments of the gay community to this day.
Originally posted by PVS
more 'advanced' homosexuals progress to raping children.
I wouldn't say more "advanced", I would say more "perverse..." Either way..they're both perverted to some degree, however, not on the same level.
Originally posted by PVS
men who rape little girls are in fact homosexual
Never stated that..now you're just making stuff up bud..😉
For obvious reasons mentioned throughout this thread, some paedophiles..are clearly more perverted than others.
Originally posted by PVS
is that the brown nugget you're trying to dig up? please enlighten me.
I don't think anyone can enlighten you PVS..I've already attempted to rationalize with you for over 20 pages..and it still hasn't gotten through your head that a society assigns different "degrees" to perversion and obscenity. If you didn't learn that by the age of 18, then you'll never be able to understand it.
Originally posted by PVS
please. decode the speech, and say what you mean. because this is getting stale.
Repeat:
One can't apply "Relativism" to various obscene acts. Some acts are obviously more perverse than others.
Ok whob... So 2 cases come to court....
1) a man rapes a 5 yr old girl...
2) a man rapes a 5 yr old boy...
How many years should the man get in each case? (I want years... Not just "life..." or capital punishment....) You can even quote cases if you want...
How much perverse is raping the same sex over the opposite.. Is this not a case of sexism?? 😆
Originally posted by Lörd Sorgo
That's sad. I was hoping for some rebuttal instead of a towel throw-in.Meh, you need some better excuses!
a debate works like this:
person one brings up points to support their argument and/or refute the points of the opposition.
person to in turn will either bring up counterpoints and/or add something new to the discussion.
this goes back and forth and that is a debate.
what i see here is me refuting your points, you ignoring that and repeating yourself. its a cop out, and im not playing along
sorry :/
Originally posted by whobdamandog
Never stated that..now you're just making stuff up bud..😉
For obvious reasons mentioned throughout this thread, some paedophiles..are clearly more perverted than others.
aww but why not whob? this way you can just blame all paedophelia on the queers. you are not very good at scapegoating, though you do put in your best effort. research the scapegoating tactics of jerry falwell, and you will be yet closer to mastering the art of connecting irrelevant issues and making an ass out of yourself.
Originally posted by whobdamandog
Yes..but he's not on the same level of perversion as the homosexual paedophile..at least according to nature.ie: nature = "male + female" not "man + man"
According to nature? When did you go out and interview nature? Have you spent any time at all studying nature or even going outside and experienceing and learning about nature.
This argument against homosexuality is one of the worst. Homosexuality occurs often in nature. SO if it happens in nature, then it is a natural occurance.
Homosexuality has been observed in Bonobo chimps, Gorillas, Bottlenosed dolphins, Japanese Macaques,Sheep, Lions, Birds ,and many other creatures.
Here are some references if you choose to research it:
Bagemihl, B. (1999). Biological exuberance: animal homosexuality and natural diversity. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press
Bama, L. (1997, February). Macho rams “take a walk on the wild side”. High Country News, 29, 2.
Kluger, J. (1999, April). The gay side of nature. Time Magazine, 25-27.
Phillips, H. (2002). Homosexuality is biological, suggests gay sheep study. Retrieved April 2, 2003, from htttp://www.newscientist.com/news
Vasey, P.L., Chapais, B., & Gathier, C. (1998). Mounting interactions between female Japanese Macaques: testing the influence of dominance and aggression. Ethology, 104, 387-398.
Weiten, W. (2001). Psychology themes and variations (5th ed.). United States: Thompson Learning, Inc.
Originally posted by KharmaDog
Phillips, H. (2002). Homosexuality is biological, suggests gay sheep study. Retrieved April 2, 2003, from htttp://www.newscientist.com/news
If someone's gay and all, fine with me...but was this study really necessary? How do you make a proposition to receive the funding for this one?
Originally posted by botankus
If someone's gay and all, fine with me...but was this study really necessary? How do you make a proposition to receive the funding for this one?
The Gay sheep were a Welsh recombinant DNA experimant I believe, for the purposes of shipping to New Zealand where lonely men will find them highly useful. 🙂 Although both the Welsh and New Zealanders like heterosexual sheep also, I believe (allegedly). After all Cardiff does have Castle Cock!
🙂
Originally posted by Hit_and_Miss
Ok whob... So 2 cases come to court....1) a man rapes a 5 yr old girl...
2) a man rapes a 5 yr old boy...How many years should the man get in each case? (I want years... Not just "life..." or capital punishment....) You can even quote cases if you want...
How much perverse is raping the same sex over the opposite.. Is this not a case of sexism?? 😆
Well from what I can gather, in the US and many other countries, the law has different categories of rape. I believe rape involving "sodomy", sexual intercourse through penetration of the anus, carries a greater sentence than rape which involves vaginal intercourse.
If no penetration is involved, I believe the sexual offense is usually classified as molestation, which carries a lesser penalty than rape..correct me if I'm wrong however.
And let's not forget, often times one's punishment is also based on the amount of times they've commited the offense.
So in a nutshell...it all really depends on the type of "rape" one has commited, and the circumstances involved when they commited said offense.
From a social perspective, I believe many societies tend to give harsher penalties to men who sexually abuse young boys, as opposed to those who sexually abuse young girls. It's kind of like being doubly perverse..not only are you engaging in sexual relations with someone who isn't physically mature, but you're also going against what most deem to be the predominant "coupling" of the sexes within nature.
Originally posted by whobdamandog
Well from what I can gather, in the US and many other countries, the law has different categories of rape. I believe rape involving "sodomy", sexual intercourse through penetration of the anus, carries a greater sentence than rape which involves vaginal intercourse.
Ok, You didn't answer the question cause I was kinda vague...
2 cases come to court....
1) a man rapes a 5 yr old girl... (he sodomises her)
2) a man rapes a 5 yr old boy... (he sodomises him)
Both crimes are exactly the same, The only difference is the sex of the child...
How many years should the man get in each case? (I want years... Not just "life..." or capital punishment....) You can even quote cases if you want...
Originally posted by whobdamandog
From a social perspective, I believe many societies tend to give harsher penalties to men who sexually abuse young boys, as opposed to those who sexually abuse young girls. It's kind of like being doubly perverse..not only are you engaging in sexual relations with someone who isn't physically mature, but you're also going against what most deem to be the predominant "coupling" of the sexes within nature.
Other then what the bible says, And the fact that Men can not have babies,
Can you offer any reason as to Why Men on Men Relationships are wrong??