NAMBLA

Originally posted by Hit_and_Miss

2 cases come to court....

1) a man rapes a 5 yr old girl... (he sodomises her)
2) a man rapes a 5 yr old boy... (he sodomises him)

Both crimes are exactly the same, The only difference is the sex of the child...

How many years should the man get in each case? (I want years... Not just "life..." or capital punishment....) You can even quote cases if you want...

Originally posted by whobdamandog

From a social perspective, I believe many societies tend to give harsher penalties to men who sexually abuse young boys, as opposed to those who sexually abuse young girls. It's kind of like being doubly perverse..not only are you engaging in sexual relations with someone who isn't physically mature, but you're also going against what most deem to be the predominant "coupling" of the sexes within nature.

That's my answer.

Originally posted by Hit_and_Miss
Can you offer any reason as to Why Men on Men Relationships are wrong??

Well they're going against the very nature of various functions of their bodies..

Sexual relationships between same sex couples are done simply for the sake of self gratification rather than procreation.

There are no benefits to such behaviors, like producing offspring. In fact..the only biological benefits linked to homosexual promiscuity are STD's, and a host of other physical ailments.

Not to mention that it's just plain perverted..I really shouldn't have to explain, but unfortunately that's what it has come to in this day and age..it used to be that people just inherently knew these things were wrong, unfortunately nowadays in this age of "relativism" everything can be rationalized as being "okay" and "acceptable." A sad state of affairs the world is in, I have pity on all of those who will one day realize how foolish they were for following such doctrine.

Fin

Originally posted by Hit_and_Miss

Other then what the bible says, And the fact that Men can not have babies,
Can you offer any reason as to Why Men on Men Relationships are wrong??

Those are good enough in my book! 👆 🙂

A funny thing that I was thinking:

Pedophilia may become legal soon enough.

You might think "What the hell?!?" "That's perverse! People will never allow it."

The same thing was said about gay marriage no less than 50 years ago.

If you would have told folks that it would become legal and widely accepted they wouldn't have believed you.

If you would have said "It's their business. If it doesn't hurt anybody, why do you care? It's about love. As long as they love each other.".. you would have been ridiculed for being a fool.

And yet here it is, 2006 and of course gay marriage is legal. Of course it's okay... "They love each other"

Well who is to say that a man can't be married to more than one woman? (poligamy)

If all the people are of legal age, and "in love", why should we stop them?

If a brother loves his sister (incest) and they are of legal age, then who the hell are we to stand in the way of love?

Things will change rapidly, you watch.

After poligamy, and incest, either bestiality or pedophilia will become leagal. (necrophilia should be fine, right,... after all, if the husband wants to f*ck his dead wife, who's business is it? He still "loves" her.)

It will all just arode in the end. Sexual morality will go out the window,and it will be a state of sexual anarchy. (sex, like anything else, needs borders and boundaries.)

Call me a fool, call me crazy... call me in 50-75 years and we'll see if I was wrong. 😉

Originally posted by KharmaDog
According to nature? When did you go out and interview nature? Have you spent any time at all studying nature or even going outside and experienceing and learning about nature.

This argument against homosexuality is one of the worst. Homosexuality occurs often in nature. SO if it happens in nature, then it is a natural occurance.

Homosexuality has been observed in Bonobo chimps, Gorillas, Bottlenosed dolphins, Japanese Macaques,Sheep, Lions, Birds ,and many other creatures.

Here are some references if you choose to research it:

Bagemihl, B. (1999). Biological exuberance: animal homosexuality and natural diversity. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press

Bama, L. (1997, February). Macho rams “take a walk on the wild side”. High Country News, 29, 2.

Kluger, J. (1999, April). The gay side of nature. Time Magazine, 25-27.

Phillips, H. (2002). Homosexuality is biological, suggests gay sheep study. Retrieved April 2, 2003, from htttp://www.newscientist.com/news

Vasey, P.L., Chapais, B., & Gathier, C. (1998). Mounting interactions between female Japanese Macaques: testing the influence of dominance and aggression. Ethology, 104, 387-398.

Weiten, W. (2001). Psychology themes and variations (5th ed.). United States: Thompson Learning, Inc.

I've gone over this many times, in many threads..sexual behavior in animals can not be equated with sexual behavior in humans we talk, read, write, drive cars, etc, etc, etc..we are not animals. But you are welcome to believe that you are one.

Another point I wanted to bring up with you K-Dog is one that you brought up a while ago about the "sexual" characteristics of various body parts..I understood what you meant, however, I believe you should have more appropriately defined the way in which a woman pouts her lips as being a "sexual behavior"..not a "sexual characteristic."

There is no sexual function equated to the lips that I know of, nor the breasts for that matter. I believe some sociologists believe that men initially were attracted to women with "large" breasts due to the fact that it was believed that women with "larger" breasts..were more inclined to having healthy children..correct me if I'm wrong however. The same type of rationale was applied to women with "wide hips"(ie the expression.."child rearing hips"..we all know their is no "sexual charcteristic" to the hips however)

Anyway.."sexual behaviors" and "sexual functions/characteristics" are two different things..Just a little FYI...

Originally posted by sithsaber408
A funny thing that I was thinking:

Pedophilia may become legal soon enough.

🤨 Are you on something, homes? I really don't think a 40 year old f*cking a 5 year old will EVER be legalized!

Originally posted by Quiero Mota
🤨 Are you on something, homes? I really don't think a 40 year old f*cking a 5 year old will EVER be legalized!

Read the whole post, ese.

Think about it.

Tell the veteranos from the 50's that gay marriage would be legal, and they would have slapped you.

Just wait 50-75 more years, we will have more things that were "perverted" leagalized, because,...well "they love each other"

Pedophilia may be the last one, but just wait.

Originally posted by sithsaber408
Read the whole post, ese.

Think about it.

I did, pero no gusta. I don't agree, ese.

I can see bestiality, necrophilia, and arbophelia WAY before adults banging little kids like a screendoor in a hurricane. There has to be a cut-off age, que no?

Originally posted by Quiero Mota
🤨 Are you on something, homes? I really don't think a 40 year old f*cking a 5 year old will EVER be legalized!

That's what NAMBLA'S pushing for ese..and people said the exact same thing about homosexuality many years ago..the more a society delves into the realm of perversity..the more perverse that society generally becomes.

It's kind of like how most crack addicts come about..most of them don't start out doing crack, they start out smoking weed, or doing some other minor drug. They then gradually break down the limitations of what they'll use to get high..until they become a full blown out junkie.

This society we live in is almost to the point of becoming like the 'crack addict'..and the question that many people are going to have to ask themselves in the near future is do I want to be a part of it? And am I truly willing to break from the mold, and stand up for what I believe in?

I dont think drug addictions and adults f*cking kids are very comparable.

Originally posted by Quiero Mota
I did, pero no gusta. I don't agree, ese.

I can see bestiality, necrophilia, and arbophelia WAY before adults banging little kids like a screendoor in a hurricane. There has to be a cut-off age, que no?

Simon carnal, pero....when things get all f*cked up (bestiality okay, incest okay, poligamy okay, necrophilia okay,...) what the hell kind of morals are people gonna have to say that sleeping with kids is wrong.

The world will be halfway to hell then, I don't think they'll stop at children. (enough people do it now.)

I dont see necrophelia either. Its wierd, morbid, and I sure dont anyone f*cking MY corpse, ese! It shows absolutely no respect for the deceased.

On a sidenote, here's a wierd but true story: in 1998 some college girl went to Vegas for spring break, and while there she had a onenight stand with some vato. Less than a week later she noticed a green tinge to her skin and flu-like symptoms. She went to a doctor, and after examining her he called the cops because she had contracted an ailment that you can only get from having sex with dead people! So the ese she f*cked was a necro!!! 😱

Chinga con el muertos.........pinche cochinos!!!!! 😘

I know that putita!

Gina cochina!

Originally posted by sithsaber408
A funny thing that I was thinking:

Pedophilia may become legal soon enough.

You might think "What the hell?!?" "That's perverse! People will never allow it."

The same thing was said about gay marriage no less than 50 years ago.

If you would have told folks that it would become legal and widely accepted they wouldn't have believed you.

If you would have said "It's their business. If it doesn't hurt anybody, why do you care? It's about love. As long as they love each other.".. you would have been ridiculed for being a fool.

And yet here it is, 2006 and of course gay marriage is legal. Of course it's okay... "They love each other"

Well who is to say that a man can't be married to more than one woman? (poligamy)

If all the people are of legal age, and "in love", why should we stop them?

If a brother loves his sister (incest) and they are of legal age, then who the hell are we to stand in the way of love?

Things will change rapidly, you watch.

After poligamy, and incest, either bestiality or pedophilia will become leagal. (necrophilia should be fine, right,... after all, if the husband wants to f*ck his dead wife, who's business is it? He still "loves" her.)

It will all just arode in the end. Sexual morality will go out the window,and it will be a state of sexual anarchy. (sex, like anything else, needs borders and boundaries.)

Call me a fool, call me crazy... call me in 50-75 years and we'll see if I was wrong. 😉

I'm dead serious about this though.

Any more comments on it?

Originally posted by sithsaber408
I'm dead serious about this though.

Any more comments on it?

I could definitely see polygamy and incest being legalized in the near future. Polygamy is widely accepted in many cultures, at least on a heterosexual level. Can you imagine 2 guys and a chick getting married? Or two brothers and a sister..scary thought.

I'm not to sure about the beastility part..but you never know..you've got some sick mf'er's out there...when you have people saying stuff like...

"Screwing a dog is the same as screwing a 15 year old.." or "There is no right or wrong..everything is shades of gray" Then who the hell knows, I would definitely say that anything is plausible.

thats great whob. we'll all just leave you 2 lovebirds alone to blow smoke up eachother's asses and spew chunks all over an already shitty thread. keep making blind assumptions and nonsensical connections, and maybe nobody will suspect your craving for the man meat.

Originally posted by PVS
keep making blind assumptions and nonsensical connections, and maybe nobody will suspect your craving for the man meat.

😆

Originally posted by PVS
thats great whob. we'll all just leave you 2 lovebirds alone to blow smoke up eachother's asses and spew chunks all over an already shitty thread. keep making blind assumptions and nonsensical connections, and maybe nobody will suspect your craving for the man meat.

Is it just me..or is there just a hint of "homophobia" in the quote above..😉

you still havent answered my question on whether or not you would accept oral sex from a woman. im sure you still will avoid it, but i just wanted to point out what a joke you are in avoiding such a simple question.
amazing how easy it is to own you 🙂

I found an anti pedophile wesbite, and pedophiles have been posting on it...😠

Originally posted by PVS
you still havent answered my question on whether or not you would accept oral sex from a woman.

Whob, if you're str8 and normal; "Hell yeah!" should have been your immediate response.