Wait a second..so only if you prefer having sex with men, animals, and women...that's a sexual preference...but preferring to have sex with kids is not..
Thank you all once again for explain these things to me, Each day I post here, I gain such knowledge and wisdom..
Thanks again..
It all makes sense to me now..Raz you may now close this thread..
😆
Originally posted by whobdamandog
Wait a second..so only if you prefer having sex with men, animals, and women...that's a sexual preference...but preferring to have sex with kids is not..Thank you all once again for explain these things to me, Each day I post here, I gain such knowledge and wisdom..
Thanks again..
It all makes sense to me now..Raz you may now close this thread..
😆
What the..., I told you it's a sexual preference.
Originally posted by whobdamandog
Wait a second..so only if you prefer having sex with men, animals, and women...that's a sexual preference...but preferring to have sex with kids is not..Thank you all once again for explain these things to me, Each day I post here, I gain such knowledge and wisdom..
Thanks again..
It all makes sense to me now..Raz you may now close this thread..
😆
Are you a pervert? Having sex with animals is also a crime.
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
I respectfully disagree! Pedophilia is a crime in the US, and it destroys a child's life. Sex does not destroy, rape and pedophilia do destroy.
Paedophilia is the attraction to children. That is a fact.
That Paedophilia is also commonly reffered to as the Sexual intercourse with Children, is true, but that'S not the major and not the original definition.
The only reason people are claiming that being attracted to a male child doesn't necessarily make you homosexual is because people are placing way too much emphasis on the definition "attracted to children."
It doesn't mean, necessarily, attracted to the concept. It actually does mean attracted to the physical aspects of children, if these are male and female or exclusively male/female, then you are a homosexual paedophile.
Not too sure why everyone is getting this confused. Lesbians aren't necessarily attracted to women because they look at them and think, "Oh wow, she does girls." It's because they're attracted, physically, to their own sex.
-AC
Originally posted by Bardock42
Paedophilia is the attraction to children. That is a fact.That Paedophilia is also commonly reffered to as the Sexual intercourse with Children, is true, but that'S not the major and not the original definition.
So you are making a difference between Pedophilia as the desire and child rape as the act? OK, I can see that, but I don't think wob is.
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
The only reason people are claiming that being attracted to a male child doesn't necessarily make you homosexual is because people are placing way too much emphasis on the definition "attracted to children."It doesn't mean, necessarily, attracted to the concept. It actually does mean attracted to the physical aspects of children, if these are male and female or exclusively male/female, then you are a homosexual paedophile.
Not too sure why everyone is getting this confused. Lesbians aren't necessarily attracted to women because they look at them and think, "Oh wow, she does girls." It's because they're attracted, physically, to their own sex.
-AC
That'S what we are saying.
A homosexual is attracted to her/his sex(Age is not the important factor)
A paedophile is attracted to children (male/female does not matter)
And then there are homosexual paedophiles that are only attracted to children of their own sex.
is it comprehensible?
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
So you are making a difference between Pedophilia as the desire and child rape as the act? OK, I can see that, but I don't think wob is.
Yes I am, you know why? Cause there is a difference...factually...
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
I'll reiterate that the definition is "attracted to children" not "attracted to the concept of a child." Which is what many of you have deduced it to be in your own favour.-AC
and why are the two not the same? are you attracted to women just because of **** and ass? would you prefer to date the hellen kellar type? or are you attracted to the concept of a woman as well as her...equipment.
Originally posted by Slay
Wasn't that on South Park 😑
Yes, Namblka was, Cartman joined, good episode.
Originally posted by whobdamandog
okay..so anyway..pedophilia is a sexual preference..and well NAMBLA is made up of a bunch of "Homosexual Pedophiles"Sounds bout right to me..😉
Back on Topic...
Hmm I guess, you could say that...emphasize on paedophiles of course.
Originally posted by PVS
and why are the two not the same? are you attracted to women just because of **** and ass? would you prefer to date the hellen kellar type? or are you attracted to the concept of a woman as well as her...equipment.
What do you mean why aren't they the same? Because...they're not. One would be being attracted to, as you guessed, the innocence and purity. The other would be an attraction to very young boys or girls because they have chosen to find those kinda of young humans visually and sexually attractive. Which is the more likely for sexual paedophilic attacks? "I wanna kidnap and subsequently have sex with that kid because he's just so innocent and a child. Don't like the look of him, but he's a child." or "I wanna kidnap and subsequently have sex with that kid because I am attracted to what children look like"? You tell me.
Am I attracted to women just because of **** and ass? Physically, I'm attracted to physical elements. All women have the same body parts, but I'm not attracted to all women. Just like paedophiles aren't realistically attracted to ALL children, CHILDREN is just the preferred choice. If it were a concept, no paedophile would turn down any child.
-AC
Originally posted by whobdamandog
What if you knew that the kid was 14 but he looked like a twenty year old young Brad Pitt?Would you be attracted to him then?
First off, there is a difference between knowing someone is attractive and being attracted to them. Anyone, man or woman, gay or straight, can look at a 14 year old boy and tell that he will grow up to be an attractive man. That isn't pedophilia. It also doesn't imply sexual attraction.
That being said, I've never encountered a 14 year old that I mistook for a 20 year old.
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
What do you mean why aren't they the same? Because...they're not. One would be being attracted to, as you guessed, the innocence and purity. The other would be an attraction to very young boys or girls because they have chosen to find those kinda of young humans visually and sexually attractive. Which is the more likely for sexual paedophilic attacks? "I wanna kidnap and subsequently have sex with that kid because he's just so innocent and a child. Don't like the look of him, but he's a child." or "I wanna kidnap and subsequently have sex with that kid because I am attracted to what children look like"? You tell me.Am I attracted to women just because of **** and ass? Physically, I'm attracted to physical elements. All women have the same body parts, but I'm not attracted to all women. Just like paedophiles aren't realistically attracted to ALL children, CHILDREN is just the preferred choice. If it were a concept, no paedophile would turn down any child.
-AC
thank you for running the hell out of a misstatement. i shall correct myself and say ***directly related*** which qualities in physical appearance and concept may differ, but who's agruing that?