Originally posted by GalacticStorm
So purple mans a reality warper in the same sense that was claimed for the sword? Theres a difference between changing how we can perceive things and changing whats actually there to be perceived. 🙂
Answer my question please or I shall consider it a dodge, what do you think reality is?
Originally posted by Sir Whirlysplat
Answer my question please or I shall consider it a dodge, what do you think reality is?
Consider it what you will. Whether thats the reality of the situation is down to beholder. 🙂
So i guess Purple mans a reality warper in the same sense as was claimed for the sword. I guess any old telepath is a reality warper in the same sense as well? 😕
Originally posted by GalacticStorm
Consider it what you will. Whether thats the reality of the situation is down to beholder. 🙂So i guess Purple mans a reality warper in the same sense as was claimed for the sword. I guess any old telepath is a reality warper in the same sense as well? 😕
They certainly alter the individuals reality.
And those whose hearts are fixed on Reality itself deserve the title of Philosophers. (Plato, Republic, 380BC)
You little Philosopher GS 🙂
Originally posted by Sir Whirlysplat
They certainly alter the individuals reality.And those whose hearts are fixed on Reality itself deserve the title of Philosophers. (Plato, Republic, 380BC)
You little Philosopher GS 🙂
So they're reality warpers in a sense however if their power was categorised in a handbook they would hardly be called reality warpers would they? 😕
They and Supes feats are a change in an individuals perception of their surroundings and not an alteration of actuality itself in a Franklin Richards mould. Cool. 🙂
Originally posted by GalacticStorm
So they're reality warpers in a sense however if their power was categorised in a handbook they would hardly be called reality warpers would they? 😕
They had no hand books in 84 and you do well to be confused because your lack of basic philosophical concepts is about to be exploited further through the rest of your highly simplistic post.
Originally posted by GalacticStorm
They and Supes feats are a change in an individuals perception of their surroundings and not an alteration of actuality itself in a Franklin Richards mould. Cool. 🙂
Basic Metaphysics Kant's famous argument: the "deduction of the categories" — reality as unknowable "things-in-themselves" — the phenomenal and noumenal worlds.
The question you unknowingly ask is The primacy of existence vs. the primacy of consciousness — the subjective, the intrinsic and the objective. In closing GS I would like to quote Martin Luther King, Jr.: "Nothing in the world is more dangerous than a sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity."
Now heres a deserved smiley 🙂
Originally posted by demigawd
Whirly is being difficult. He knows damn good and well the difference between reality and one's perception of reality, especially when there's a clear divorce between the two. Don't you, Whirly? 😉
Well Reality is always subjective Demi do you see the same thing as the colour red as I do we both know it's red but is my red your red and which is the real red. 🙂
The act of observation by its nature affects reality itself, this though is a slightly different argument.
Originally posted by Sir Whirlysplat
Well Reality is always subjective Demi do you see the same thing as the colour red as I do we both know it's red but is my red your red and which is the real red. 🙂The act of observation by its nature affects reality itself, this though is a slightly different argument.
🙄
Originally posted by Sir Whirlysplat
Well Reality is always subjective Demi do you see the same thing as the colour red as I do we both know it's red but is my red your red and which is the real red. 🙂The act of observation by its nature affects reality itself, this though is a slightly different argument.
...
translation: I'm being difficult
Originally posted by Sir Whirlysplat
And people say that you have absolutely nothing to offer this board! Damn Liars! After all, you have inferiority!😉
And what people would that be? The views of a few embittered posters hardly warrants my attention.
Its more or less agreed here that no god connection exists in canon. Let it go mate. 🙁
Originally posted by GalacticStorm
And what people would that be? The views of a few embittered posters hardly warrants my attention.Its more or less agreed here that no god connection exists in canon. Let it go mate. 🙁
oooOOOO Diddums http://images.killermovies.com/forums/moresmilies/baby.gif
Originally posted by Sir Whirlysplat
oooOOOO Diddums http://images.killermovies.com/forums/moresmilies/baby.gif
Ohhh the irony. 😉
Its quite an open and shut case really as other members of the clan have commented. 🙂
No conclusive on panel evidence with regards to a god connection
And a quite apparent difference between ones perception of reality and reality itself as is the case with comics which i believe is the subject matter right? 😕
Cool. 🙂
