Marka Ragnos versus Naga Sadow and Exar Kun

Originally posted by Numan
That scan does not prove that Ragnos was powerful because there could be many reasons why they bow down to him. They could have just respected him as he did lead them well and brought about a golden age of the sith. Ludo Kressh was his padawan and judging by his character, he would have likely looked up to him. He was not actually very power hungry and just wanted what was best for the sith empire. Naga Sadow could have bowed down to him for many reasons. He could have been trying to act loyal to him to gain support from the other sith lords for instance. You are interpreting that they bowed down to him because they feared him and that therefor Ragnos was more powerful than either of them. All that scan proves is that they did in fact bow down to him and it is your interpretation that they did it out of fear and were therefor not as powerful as him.

The Sith dont look up to anyone, they selfish in the way they learn what they can from their master and at the time they're stronger or able to muster enough strength to be stronger, they backstabb their master.

Sadow would not do that, the Sith hated Ragnos, he ruled with an iron fist, Ragnos had no true support, its by the very fact he was the most powerful, that noone ever betrayed him.

Yes, True, but a battle of feat wars is exactly the same, eg. Luke can stun people with his green lightning. therefore he stuns whoever and wins. That doesnt work, you need to prove it works on everyone, you need to prove it works on force beings and etc.

Another factor that proves Ragnos was truly leagues above Kressh and Sadow and most definitely Kun is that, while Kressh and Sadow were under his rule, they never fought, they never bickered in the sense that it would create civil war, none of them even tried to overthrow Ragnos, most likely any attempt would fail, Remeber Ragnos's scepter and consider how much force Tavion needed to gather to resurrect him, it took planets worth of force, that obviously means the he posses that much power.

Consider also, that no other Sith accepted the commands and decisions of any other spirits eg. Kun and Nadd, Sadow and Nadd etc.

Yet when Ragnos crowned Ulic and Kun, there was no dispute he was obviously known to be the most powerful sith of all time

Amen

How do you even know that it was Ragnos that said Ulic and Exar would bring about a new golden age of the sith.

Omfg.. Read the damn comics. It has been conclusively proven that Ragnos is THE speaker for the ancient sith.

There is no proof.

You are the dumbest person on these forums.

And you are the bigest loser on these forums but that is neither here nor there. How about you read the comics. it said that it was the reigning dark lord. that is not Marka Ragnos.

Originally posted by Numan
And you are the bigest loser on these forums but that is neither here nor there. How about you read the comics. it said that it was the reigning dark lord. that is not Marka Ragnos.

Tdtd is right; you are the dumbest person on these forums. Sith have no 'padawans', and you arguing against scans and saying "omfg tur is noe pruf!" just goes to show what an ignoramus you really are.

I'm dumb because I don't share the same beliefs about Star Wars that you do. Sure thing Wesker. How am I arguing against the scan. I am using the scan and arguing against his point.

You can't argue against a scan you moron. The scan IS the proof, it is definitive, right there in front of you.

Exactky you fool and the scan doesn't say it was Ragnos.

If you read all the comics instead of arguing without knowledge like a tool, you would know it is Ragnos that crowns the DLOTS, and it has always been Ragnos.

I have the comic right here you idiot. it is right in front of me now.

Hold up. . . so now Ragnos isn't Dark Lord of the Sith? It just keeps getting better and better. . .

Numan: Be quiet you fool. You have no proof, and I do, so I win. You're an idiot.

Originally posted by Faunus
Hold up. . . so now Ragnos isn't Dark Lord of the Sith? It just keeps getting better and better. . .

Numan: Be quiet you fool. You have no proof, and I do, so I win. You're an idiot.

Why don't you tell me how to scan the picture you idiot and then I will prove you wrong. It says the reigning dark lord of the sith. That was not Ragnos. You are the fool.

*gasp* I nailed the reponse again. And if you'd had the sense of of a four year-old, you'd have realized that the second part of the post was a prediction of what you'd say.

And the reigning Dark Lord was Ragnos; when you're old enough to prove me wrong, come back.

That was like a thousand years afterwards. Naga sadow, Ludo Kressh and Freedon nadd had all been dark lords since then.

A thousand years afterwards? You are incredibly stupid. Sadow was the DLOTS right after Ragnos died. Kressh claimed himself DLOTS while Sadow was fighting the Republic. Nadd was around 600 years after the fall of the Sith empire and was never a DLOTS because he wouldn't challenge the current Dark Lord.

The point is that there were many sith lords since.

Originally posted by Numan
That was like a thousand years afterwards. Naga sadow, Ludo Kressh and Freedon nadd had all been dark lords since then.

Damn Numan. . .

After Ragnos died, Sadow killed Kressh by crashing a ship into his cruiser. Then, after the little war, Sado went into exile on Yavin 4. A few centuries later, Nadd apprenticed himself to the Sith. Four hundred more years later, the whole Kun saga takes place. In case you hadn't noticed, there hasn't been a single ruling Dark Lord since Ragnos. It was Ragnos who spoke to Kun about the Golden Age, not Sadow - who'd been killed one way or another - or Kressh, and certainly not Nadd, who'd been obliterated by the amulet beforehand.