Originally posted by Alliance
Anyway...when episodes I and II were nominated for special effects, they didn't win either. No way Episode III was going to win. Kong's effects were far superior to Star Wars. Lucas keeps doing the same thing and he's not going to get nominated for that. When he does break through, like in Episode I and in Episode II, then he gets the nod.
I have to disagree with you about Kong's supposedly superior graphics. Too much green screen work was used and they spent all their time working on Kong, so that other aspects of CGI looked totally shitty. Kong himself? Yes, he looked fantastic, much better than the Episode III graphics, but overall the movie fell short.
Don't get me wrong, Episode III had a lot of shit work on it too. I'm not a fan of CGI or of green screen work. I prefer the more traditional filming of a movie.
That right there is why the PT sucked so bad, it wasn't real anymore. The OT, now that was real. Real people, real bad guys...even if they were cheap puppets or guys in a foam latex suit. The movies had the lighting perfect because the lighting elements were actually there. The actors had someone to act against, etc.