Oneness VS Trinity

Started by ushomefree8 pages
Originally posted by Da Pittman
How could you even make that statement?!?!? You think I'm some sort of dumbass?

Not at all.

Originally posted by Da Pittman
How does Reproof "the act of criticizing somebody for having done something wrong, or something said as a rebuke" Mean to study?

The Bible is not subjective, but those with false motivations, make it so! If anyone, and I mean anyone, who read and studied the Bible in the plain words that it speaks, then you and I would not be having this conversation. In other words, the core fundamentals would be embraced--as such it does--but peripheral aspects of Scripture would be debated. This occurs today, and their is nothing wrong with that! Why? Certain aspects of Scripture are "out of focus," but not the basics--the core fundamentals!! So... for a person (or group of people to claim) that Jesus is not the Messiah, is completely unbiblical. Why? The Bible does not support it, and if you have read the entire Bible--even the New Testament--you would agree, whether you prescribe to the message or not. The Bible does not require a rocket-scientist to understand it.

Originally posted by Da Pittman
This would imply that you should use the word of God to criticize others but doesn't it also say not to judge other less you be judged?

What does this have to do with studying the Bible (without biases)?

ushomefree this sounds like you are saying that everyone else is wrong but you. How do you know that the person who instructed you in the bible was not one of those "with false motivations"?

Goin' to Chic-File! BRB!!

Real quick: Shaky... you have read the the Bible?

Originally posted by ushomefree
Real quick: Shaky... you have read the the Bible?

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Yes, and the OT as well, but that was a long time ago. However, it is irrelevant.

For example; I could ask you "Hove you read the Lotus sutra? Well, sense you have not, then how could you know anything?" Do you see how your question is irrelevant?

It makes me think that you are just trying to belittle me.

I used to be a Christian.

Originally posted by ushomefree
Not at all.
Then what is the reason that you would make that claim?

Originally posted by ushomefree
The Bible is not subjective, but those with false motivations, make it so! If anyone, and I mean anyone, who read and studied the Bible in the plain words that it speaks, then you and I would not be having this conversation. In other words, the core fundamentals would be embraced--as such it does--but peripheral aspects of Scripture would be debated. This occurs today, and their is nothing wrong with that! Why? Certain aspects of Scripture are "out of focus," but not the basics--the core fundamentals!! So... for a person (or group of people to claim) that Jesus is not the Messiah, is completely unbiblical. Why? The Bible does not support it, and if you have read the entire Bible--even the New Testament--you would agree, whether you prescribe to the message or not. The Bible does not require a rocket-scientist to understand it.
So now you are either calling me a dumbass again or a liar (which pisses me off to no end). I have read the Bible new and old many times from cover to cover and gone back to it many different times in debates. The Bible is about as clear as mud and if, as I have said, the message was perfect then there would be no question as to the meaning. You didn’t even comment on my God-Breath statement which I would like an answer too.

Originally posted by ushomefree
What does this have to do with studying the Bible (without biases)?
Did you not read my post and the definition of the word reproof? You said this word means to study, how does criticizing someone mean study?

I have no time for this; call it what you want, but you are ignorant when it comes to be Bible. It doesn't take all day to recognize sunshine.

Originally posted by ushomefree
I have no time for this; call it what you want, but you are ignorant when it comes to be Bible. It doesn't take all day to recognize sunshine.

So, because we disagree with you, that makes us ignorant? Is someone like peejayd also ignorant when it comes to the Bible just because he disagrees with you, or do you just hate non-Christians?

Originally posted by ushomefree
I have no time for this; call it what you want, but you are ignorant when it comes to be Bible. It doesn't take all day to recognize sunshine.
So my wife that is Catholic that disagrees with you is ignorant, her family is ignorant, other Christians on this form are ignorant, Pastors that I have talked with are ignorant? You seem to have a problem reading the posts that I have made as well as others, you skip over points in the post or direct questions just because why? You skip over the definition of the word reproof and the God-Breath question why? Didn’t you read these or don’t you understand them?

How are you supposed to deliver your message of peace and love for all when you keep calling people ignorant, liars and dumbasses? Again are you not to judge unless to be judged yourself?

Da Pittman-

Your wife--being Catholic--denies the Trinity?

Originally posted by ushomefree
Da Pittman-

Your wife--being Catholic--denies the Trinity?

Really how do you come up with these conclusions? Did I say that at all in any of my posts?

Originally posted by ushomefree
Da Pittman-

Your wife--being Catholic--denies the Trinity?

Well, maybe the bible needs to be more perfect on this point. 😉

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Well, maybe the bible needs to be more perfect on this point. 😉
or maybe, JUST MAYBE, the bible isnt meant to be a set of rules to live your life by, but just hear me out i know its KRAZY, but maybe, just maybe, its a set of lessons, and a historical account, and also a work of fiction.

Originally posted by chickenlover98
or maybe, JUST MAYBE, the bible isnt meant to be a set of rules to live your life by, but just hear me out i know its KRAZY, but maybe, just maybe, its a set of lessons, and a historical account, and also a work of fiction.

You think?

I'm gonnna try to explain this to you all. An tree has Roots,branches,and leafs. So is it not an Tree seeing that all three parts are classed differently but all make up the the tree.Come on people you are making this stuff complex.It's basic stuff 101,look at your self.your made of blood(liquid) flesh(solid) thoughts(which can't be classed).

Originally posted by Shalimar_fox
I'm gonnna try to explain this to you all. An tree has Roots,branches,and leafs. So is it not an Tree seeing that all three parts are classed differently but all make up the the tree.Come on people you are making this stuff complex.It's basic stuff 101,look at your self.your made of blood(liquid) flesh(solid) thoughts(which can't be classed).

And I also have gas in me. Or is that just my thoughts? 😆

That's funny.I'm glad you've got jokes on an matter that I wasn't ment to be funny.Hey I made to luagh so my work is done.

Originally posted by Shalimar_fox
That's funny.I'm glad you've got jokes on an matter that I wasn't ment to be funny.Hey I made to luagh so my work is done.

The topic of one god being three gods, but being only one god always makes me laugh. 😉

I guess the same is ture with those who don't belive.Being the god of them self an can't even command the wind to blow or cuase the sun to shine or even wake them self up.I find that funny

Originally posted by Shalimar_fox
I guess the same is ture with those who don't belive.Being the god of them self an can't even command the wind to blow or cuase the sun to shine or even wake them self up.I find that funny

Anyone the would think they are the god of there own self would be very silly. However, I have never met anyone like that.