Child Support?

There are women out there who will decide they want the baby just because they will get child support, which is bs.

That said, if a man is strolling around penetrating females carelessly, he isn't exactly trying to prevent this from happening is he?

I think that if both parties use contraception or something and decide they DON'T want a child, but it happens anyway, then the female should suggest that- if she wants to keep it- the man doesn't have to be tied down. She didn't want it and because she's making a choice on a whim, he has to suffer for something they agreed not to have.

It works both ways.

-AC

Originally posted by debbiejo
A Man should take charge for what is his.

He may want to take charge of what is his, but he can't do that if his girlfriend aborts his child.

I think this is a double standard. If the woman choses to keep the baby, she should raise it herself. If she goes after her partner for child support, obviously she doesn't have enough money to finacially support the baby, so why have it?

Originally posted by Makedde
obviously she doesn't have enough money to finacially support the baby, so why have it?

"People should always take responsibility for their actions. No matter what." - Your opinion or getting pregnant, for many weeks.

-AC

I meant that only if the woman acts like a whore and doesn't use protection. She should take responsiblity, but if she is careful, she will be okay.

I don't like you, btw. You piss me off.

Why, because I'm exposing your flip-flopping hypocricy at every turn?

Yeah, I bet that is a bit of a b*tch.

-AC

You don't seem to think I should have an opinion, you disrespectful git.

Have one, but don't piss and moan when you have about 9 different ones that all contradict each other, then get called up on it.

Responsibility, remember?

-AC

I don't have 9 different opinions, my opinions have always been the same, but they are just not the opinions you think I should have.

Hahaha, good one.

-AC

Well, you seem to think I should have whatever opinion you say I should have.

I think you should pick one and stick to it. Not have many that contradict one another.

I won't continue this here, already proven my point.

-AC

I have my opinions and I stick to them. You won't accept that.

I've proven that you don't, as you have.

-AC

I thought you said you wouldn't continue this here?

Child support sucks. I'm having to pay it to my ex-wife until my youngest turns 18. Its not a burden for me, just a pain in the ass.

Can I ask, what do you all think about men who are paying child support to a child who doesn't exist? There have been a few cases of that here, men paying for a child they have never seen only to find that child never existed. This happened to one man, he tried to force his ex partner to pay back the child support, but she won the court case, and the man lost. How on earth is that fair? Another man unknowingly paid child support for three children that were not even his-they were his best friends. His wife had carried on an affair with his best friend then told her husband she was pregnant by him, when she was really pregnant by his mate. She got about $40,000 out of him. He took a second job to pay child support, he spoiled the kids rotten, then he found they were not his. Initially, he won his case, but the wife appealed, and won. The man lost $40,000 that he spent on children that were not his.

Should all fathers who are ordered to pay child support have a paternity test to determine if they are the father, or should they risk being made fools of?

Paying child support for a child that doesn't exist?

That's teh most ridiculous thing I've heard in a while. Why would one do such a thing?

Look, if a man and a woman have sex and she becomes pregnant, then that is one issue. However, if the man wants an abortion and the woman does not, then in the current US political sphere, he should have the right to let the mother know his intentions. If he supports abortion and she refuses based on her morals(what else could it be based on?) then it is legitimate to take it to court and have the father absolved of social and financial responsability.

when it comes right down to it, the basic question is that of the mothers righteous attitude. And when the mother is willing to stand in fron tof a court of law and admit that, then she should have the good sense to stand by that notion when it comes down to crunch time. If she refuses abortion based on her desire to gain something finacially, then where are her morals now? If she refuses based on her moral belief that abortion is wrong and the child is her responsability, then shut the **** up and do it. If she believes that the baby is a gift from god that knows everything happens for the best, then shut the **** up and deal with it....everything will be okay. If she spread her legs and let some guy **** her without a condom, then shut the **** up and deal with it.

And, in the long run, it boils down to two factors. The mother and the father. If the father says yes and the mother says no, well...she has to carry the baby. If the mother says yes and the father says no, well...the mother has to carry the baby.

One has to wonder why homosexuals are so often called "promiscuous". Breeders would be too, if they didn't have to worry about shit like having babies. I guess baby Jesus dropped the ball on that one.

Originally posted by Capt_Fantastic
Paying child support for a child that doesn't exist?

That's teh most ridiculous thing I've heard in a while. Why would one do such a thing?

The man never saw his child, and believe his ex partner when she said she had a baby. He was naive, sure, but that woman had no right to do what she did.

Originally posted by Makedde
The man never saw his child, and believe his ex partner when she said she had a baby. He was naive, sure, but that woman had no right to do what she did.

Okay, I can't argue that.

🙂