Originally posted by ScreamPaste
No, it isn't 'a whole other level of fighting'. Sora can fly, so he flies while he fights, his fighting is needlessly flashy and over the top, that does not make him a better fighter relative to anyone else, and it has nothing to do with combat prowess above Sora can fly, a superhuman attribute.
I suppose it depends on what you mean by "better fighter". If that means "Knows more legitimate martial arts moves" then you may have a point. That isn't how I was using it, and it isn't how it should be used.
And limiting Sora's abilities to flight is down playing his skills significantly. It's more than just flight and a jedi's abilities reach more than simply having a sword that can cut armor. The fact that you actually consider a samurai and a jedi on the same fighting level except for the weapon shows you are purposely ignoring the outrageously apparent difference in ability.
I mean, I'm actually having a hard time thinking of ways to properly explain it. It's like you're trying to tell me the grass is red and I can't really say anything other than "No it isn't... Look at it."
Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Sora with no super powers other than flight, unarmed, fist fight v.s. Batman, who wins?
What do you mean "No other super powers". You mean Sora fighting like a normal person vs Batman? Sure. Batman. But notice that you have to turn Sora into a normal human in order to have Batman stand a chance. The same is true of Link.
Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Wolverine with no healing factor, Sora with nothing but flight, sword v.s. keyblade, who wins?
Once again, if you mean "make Sora a regular guy except for flight" I would give it to Wolverine. Just like I would give it to Wolverine if you took a Jedi and made him a regular guy. Normally, he isn't, though, and normally Sora isn't, either.
Originally posted by ScreamPaste
The point of including Hulk is that Hulk is a brawler who would completely crush Sora despite not fighting in a manner that's flashy.
Because he's invincible. He'd get blasted to mush if Sora's attacks could actually do damage.
Originally posted by ScreamPaste
The different between a Jedi's fighting capability and a Samurai's is that unlike the Samurai, a Jedi's weapon actually can cut through armour.
Um............... No.
The difference between a Jedi and a Samurai is that a Jedi can block lazers, run up walls, and leap like Spiderman, and can block and counter attacks from all directions in a way that is only possible in movies. A samurai can.... Swing his sword.
Give a Jedi a Samurai sword and he would still win. Really really easily.
Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Things that you should argue for:
Sora wins because (feats of destruction/speed)
And there are plenty of those, to be sure. I simply don't think they even need to be brought up in a fight like this. All you really have to do is look at the two characters and how they fight and the victor is pretty obvious.
Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Thngs you should not argue for:
Sora wins because he fights like a cartoon character.
Actually, that's an astoundingly good argument to use IF the opponent DOESN'T.
Here's the thing. You know all those fights you see in movie and games? You realize that they are completely impossible in real life, right? The one guy who takes out an entire room of thugs by himself? It would simply never happen.
That's the thing about movies or cartoons. The characters do things regular people could never dream of doing. They are created to be better than normal people. So obviously, they are better than normal people.
Sora fights like an action cartoon made to be significantly better than a normal person.
Link fights like a normal person.
Sora wins.