How to argue like Smurph
Create points FOR the other side and fail at refuting said points you've created
Say something lame, like, your arguments are so comical, I will take time out my day to address your nonsensical points!
And contradict yourself.
Originally posted by StylishSmurph
I will respond to this tonight though, because I think it's funny.
Do you even understand what I type? My original post had nothing to do with how powerful Moondragon was with the mind gem, as I've stated three times now. It had to do with the awesome power of the mind gem, and why placing a safeguard on it was completely irrelevant to Warlock's mental defenses.
And you're missing my point (which is the only relevant point as you're trying to refute ME), potential doesn't matter if you can't use it. What has Moondragon ever done that makes her so much greater then these four? What has Moondragon done that puts her above even a Base Nate Grey (in terms of raw power)? What resistance does Warlock have that shows that these 4 working together wouldn't instantly down him? How do you know that Moondragon tapping the Mind Gem to match X-Man levels of power isn't enough to easily pierce his defenses? How do you know that these safeguards weren't just put in because Moondragon's natural telepathy is good enough to own Warlock?
The ONLY thing you have is how potentially awesome the Mind Gem is, which is where how potentially awesome the Grey family is comes from.
Three phoenix's might not be as powerful as the mind gem, but then again, that's so much "limitless" power and baseless assumptions as to where the power ends I don't think it's possible to quantify who'd be more powerful
Moondragon completely being able to tap the mind gem or Cable, X-Man and Jean all reaching their potential and linking up for psionic attacks.
It wasn't a debate about "teh pheenix force!!!!11!" vs. Moondragon.
That's stuff you've made up by pointing out how "potentially" powerful Moondragon could be (not that she ever showed this potential).
You've refuted nothing.
I think I broke him.
Hell, you haven't even made a decent response or debate.
I think he's broken.
Instead you just try to connect words loosely and shove a smiley on the end in a poor, half-assed attempt to be condescending and witty.
Yup definately broken.
Go back to elementary school, grasp the concept of Reading Comprehension, practice, and then we'll talk.
I just keep hitting the Wahhhhh Wahhh pedastal.
Also, don't try to be funny unless you can be.
http://www.zzounds.com/item--DAVGCB95
Forced sarcasm or mockery usually just makes you look like you need a way out
Yup I definately broke him, he's even attacking his own arguing style.
because you can't make an actual debate concerning the original point.
But you're the one devoting posts to how much your life sucks. 🙁
In this case it's true though, so maybe you're giving the right impression... haermm
In which case, keep up the good work. 👆
"Forced sarcasm or mockery usually just makes you look like you need a way out"
done with perfection
if I do say so myself