Originally posted by Capt_Fantastic
Economy and foreign relations have nothing to do with the points you mention. You don't want gay people settling down. That's cool. Don't settle down with one. It's as easy as saying "no thanks". More over, it has nothing to do with what you think of yourself, assuming you think a gay man would walk up to you and want to have anything to do with you....much less a kid and family. Too many people think that gay men want just another dick.My aunt once tried to set me up on a date with a guy who was in his 40's! With red hair and freckles. I had no issues with the freckles, but the 4- and ginger complexion? Oh yeah. Why did this happen? Because she assumed that gay men were jusy looking for another dick. I wasn't. I was looking for that one dick that suited my life. Just like you are looking for that one vagina.
I am confused now.
(I think) that has absolutely nothing to do with what I said. I'm not trying to start a debate about homosexual marriage/abortion/anything else. I am just saying that idea of being the 'worst' at something as subjective as presidency is difficult to validate.
I mean, it's a lot different than being the worst at golf.
[And, for the record, I don't think that all gay men want dick.]
["What's it called when a guy is gay for a girl?"
"Straight."
Lawl @ Simpsons tonight.]
Originally posted by Ya Krunk'd Floo
Sometimes I think your best quality is your ability to unintentionally amuse us with your ridiculousness.'Encouraged abortions'...'promoted sexual deviance'...hahaha.
Originally posted by Imperial_Samura
That's kind of what I was thinking. I can't remember the last politician who actually encouraged abortion. Allowing it to be an option is vastly different to encouraging it. And sexual deviance? I think anything that could have produced the Bush twins must have been an unholy union, but that's just me.Still, what he seems to be saying is that no matter how well someone runs the country, he will be judged on his moral stance. For some reason that seems... odd.
29%
GO DUBYA! 👆
http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2006/05/11/bushs-approval-ratings/
Bush’s Approval Rating Drops
Wall Street Journal
President Bush’s job-approval rating has fallen to its lowest mark of his presidency, according to a new Harris Interactive poll. Of 1,003 U.S. adults surveyed in a telephone poll, 29% think Mr. Bush is doing an “excellent or pretty good” job as president, down from 35% in April and significantly lower than 43% in January.
Roughly one-quarter of U.S. adults say “things in the country are going in the right direction,” while 69% say “things have pretty seriously gotten off on the wrong track.” This trend has declined every month since January, when 33% said the nation was heading in the right direction. Iraq remains a key concern for the general public, as 28% of Americans said they consider Iraq to be one of the top two most important issues the government should address, up from 23% in April. The immigration debate also prompted 16% of Americans to consider it a top issue, down from 19% last month, but still sharply higher from 4% in March.
The Harris poll comes two days after a downbeat assessement of Bush in a New York Times/CBS News poll. The Times, in analyzing the results, said “Americans have a bleaker view of the country’s direction than at any time in more than two decades.”
Originally posted by FeceMan
[And, for the record, I don't think that all gay men want dick.]
Ehhh, correct me if I'm wrong (I'm a virgin on this front), but I think the general idea with gay men is that, yes...they do want dick. Seems to make sense, right?
Unlike this:
Originally posted by FeceMan
Gee, I guess it would be a lot less ridiculous if I said 'started a war' or 'ZOMG BLOOD 4 OIL'.
Originally posted by Ya Krunk'd Floo
Ehhh, correct me if I'm wrong (I'm a virgin on this front), but I think the general idea with gay men is that, yes...they [B]do want dick. Seems to make sense, right?Unlike this: [/B]
What I meant was:
"And, for the record, I don't think that all gay men solely want dick from their relationships."
Originally posted by Ya Krunk'd Floo
Pardon me, I forgot some of the posters on KMC have the inability to express themselves clearly, or have the decency to do so for sake of clarity. However, I guess it is a truism that schoolboys make schoolboy errors, so all is forgiven.
Wow. As juvenile as I am. Good job. 👆
Originally posted by PVS
[B]29%GO DUBYA! 👆
http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2006/05/11/bushs-approval-ratings/
Bush’s Approval Rating Drops
Wall Street Journal
President Bush’s job-approval rating has fallen to its lowest mark of his presidency, according to a new Harris Interactive poll. Of 1,003 U.S. adults surveyed in a telephone poll, 29% think Mr. Bush is doing an “excellent or pretty good” job as president, down from 35% in April and significantly lower than 43% in January.
Roughly one-quarter of U.S. adults say “things in the country are going in the right direction,” while 69% say “things have pretty seriously gotten off on the wrong track.” This trend has declined every month since January, when 33% said the nation was heading in the right direction. Iraq remains a key concern for the general public, as 28% of Americans said they consider Iraq to be one of the top two most important issues the government should address, up from 23% in April. The immigration debate also prompted 16% of Americans to consider it a top issue, down from 19% last month, but still sharply higher from 4% in March.
The Harris poll comes two days after a downbeat assessement of Bush in a New York Times/CBS News poll. The Times, in analyzing the results, said “Americans have a bleaker view of the country’s direction than at any time in more than two decades.” [/B]
So what? Approval ratings are just folks' opinions.
Originally posted by PVS
GO DUBYA! 👆
👆
Originally posted by Darth Jello
Has anyone mentioned the telephone records yet? The similarities to hitler and the IBM database? Is anyone outraged that the "spying on terrorists" consisted of everyone using AT&T, Verizon, or Bell South?
The new Halliburton contract for a network of remote "detention centers"?
Yes.
Not until now.
I can't speak for everyone, but I am.
See above.
I hope those answers help.
Originally posted by Ya Krunk'd Floo
Pardon me, I forgot some of the posters on KMC have the inability to express themselves clearly, or have the decency to do so for sake of clarity. However, I guess it is a truism that schoolboys make schoolboy errors, so all is forgiven.
i know this about bush, but this video relates to his entire administration.
it is about 9/11 and possible things that the government is covering up (if true)
I think its really worth watching its about 1hr 20min so its not just a clip, but if you have some time and an open mind id give it a watch.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=9036641176590759507&q=9%2F11+loose+change+second+edition