I didn't say that!

If you don't care, don't expect to be taken seriously, is all I'm saying.

As an aside: Should you be making fun of people's avatars when you have one that contains a Dragonball Z character?

-AC

he's pretending to not know what a sock troll is....how original.
still, notice he didnt ask...

Didn't ask what?

What does PVS stand for? What? Are you a dyslexic woman on PMS?

How can PVS stand for PMS? Not thought that one through have you? Moreover, why would dyslexia even be relevant to the one letter?

Think about the dynamics.

-AC

He's liberal, sense when did logic apply? 😂

Says the guy with all the logical abilities of a cinder block.

-AC

Hey Hack, I want you to define liberalism. both in the american sense, classical liberalism, the international relations theory of liberalism, and neoliberalism.

come, humor us before you saying anything else.

Originally posted by Darth Jello
Hey Hack, I want you to define liberalism. both in the american sense, classical liberalism, the international relations theory of liberalism, and neoliberalism.

come, humor us before you saying anything else.

here comes the interestiong parallels between politics and dragonball z, and the argument that liberals are sub-creature who have been the root of all evil since the dawn of man. all over again

Originally posted by Darth Jello
Hey Hack, I want you to define liberalism. both in the american sense, classical liberalism, the international relations theory of liberalism, and neoliberalism.

come, humor us before you saying anything else.

I spit on the face of anybody who isn't cool..

no, i meant the actual definition of every kind of liberalism as defined by a rational political scientist, not something from anne coulter's carefully edited versions of Mein Kampf and the Protocols of the Elders of zion

Originally posted by Hack Benjamin
Or for that matter what "krunk" (which sounds like what you'd call semen when it crystalizes on the face) thinks.

Are you saying I'm orgasmic? Thanks. I'm like a diamond? Oh, you praise too much!

Hack, you're a hick. Achoo...I just hocked you up.

i've tried that krunk stuff that lil' john's been putting out as promotion for krunk music. It tastes like carbonated pomegranite juice.

Originally posted by Darth Jello
i've tried that krunk stuff that lil' john's been putting out as promotion for krunk music. It tastes like carbonated pomegranite juice.

I always confuse lil john for r kelly..

you didn't answer me. If you can't define what liberalism is and argue for or against it, then your arguements can't be taken seriously and should be taken as blunt hate or as a metaphor for some other group of people you hate. The same way that "east coast liberal" is a nice way of saying k!ke

...What are you yammering about now? And I've already explained why I refuse to answer your inane question, I refuse to waste my time when you know as well as I do what the differance is between libertarians, socialists, and neo-liberals.. And kike isn't even a word..

it's a derogatory term for my people-those of a hebraic persuasion. and your inability to define liberalism in any capacity other than meaningless scapegoat simply renders you an idiot without the ability to make a reasoned argument.
Stick to the comicbook forums or discussing if Kirk could whip Picard's ass.

Only a liberal would say Picard! 😆

only a fool misses the point.

Just read this; Heres the answer to your question: Bush said that Saddam Hussein aided Al-Queda, which he did. That was his first quote three years ago. In the more recent one he says "Saddam Hueissen was not likely not directly associated with 9/11"; also a true statement because Saddam Hussein AIDEDand HARBORED AL-Queda, he wasnt a member or ranking official in it. While he may have known of the plan, Saddam was not an active participant in 9/11. Some people like to twist other people's words (Bush's for one) and this is just another example. I think whoever started this clearly misunderstood his words because they are pretty basic if you just stop and think. 😎

evidence has shown that Hussein actually persecuted and deported members of al qaida, who happened to swoop right in as soon as the country became a destabalize warzone.
here's your arguement:
Saddam Hussein hates america
Al Qaida Hates America
Saddam Hussein is a Muslim
Al Qaida is a Muslim
so Saddam Hussein must be Al Qaida.
The problem here is logic
Why would Saddam Hussein-a secular autocrat sticking to the stalinist autocrat model of governing-civillian terror and a personality cult side with religous fanatics who would threaten his rule by nullifying his cult with sharia?