Originally posted by finti
cuz thats just the way it is? and is that the answer you think would be proper to use for 9/11.who said the world need policing
We say that the world needs policing, and just like a junkee who's slangin' on a street corner, the rest of the world denies it.
The US is to the world, as a cop is to a bad neighborhood.
Who else is gonna do it.......Swaziland?
We say that the world needs policing, and just like a junkee who's slangin' on a street corner, the rest of the world denies it.who are we? I know my country follow US like a puppet on a string still dont make it right for "us" to tell others how to act
The US is to the world, as a cop is to a bad neighborhoodno US is to the world like a bad cop who picks the things that suits and gain him, a freelancing cop
Who else is gonna do it.......Swaziland?why not, they might be more just for the task
Originally posted by DiamondBullets
I grasp the gravity of the situation. I also realize that he is human, and like other humans he makes mistakes. Just like when Clinton made a "mistake" when he got his dick sucked by someone other than his wife.
I'll make this simple so it will reflect your state of being:
Clinton's mistake = a blow job and a 'lie'.
Bush's mistake = a 'lie', wars, tens of thousands dead.
Can you see a difference, little man? Let's see if you can use one of your precious bullets to hit the balls-eye? Or will there simply be more bull-shit?
Originally posted by DiamondBullets
We say that the world needs policing, and just like a junkee who's slangin' on a street corner, the rest of the world denies it.The US is to the world, as a cop is to a bad neighborhood.
Who else is gonna do it.......Swaziland?
The UN (united nations) should police... Not 1 country looking out for its own interests and no others....
Originally posted by Hit_and_Miss
The UN (united nations) should police... Not 1 country looking out for its own interests and no others....
I agree and the USA also shouldn't need to contribute the largest sum of money of the countries involved and use more of its military then the other countries as well.
Oh wait but we do so look who's interests get protected first.
Originally posted by soleran30
I agree and the USA also shouldn't need to contribute the largest sum of money of the countries involved and use more of its military then the other countries as well.Oh wait but we do so look who's interests get protected first.
I think you should go check some of the names you have given money too...
and concidering your so quick to prevent others having any nuclear weapons or development your quick to stockpile your own... (and your the only country to ever use them...)
Perhaps you should concider why these people are soo against the USA, if all there claiming is to help....🙄
Originally posted by Hit_and_Miss
I think you should go check some of the names you have given money too...and concidering your so quick to prevent others having any nuclear weapons or development your quick to stockpile your own... (and your the only country to ever use them...)
Perhaps you should concider why these people are soo against the USA, if all there claiming is to help....🙄
Everyone has dirty laundry everyone just wants to dig through the USA's first because our hamper is the largest. USA contributes a larger sum of money then MOST members to the UN. So much in fact we want to curtail some of our payment and the UN is afraid it will fall under budget should this be the case maybe the UK should tax more and contribute the difference
Also I am not a politician so I have never made any nuclear weapons nor used any. Stopping others from making them well you be the judge of that cuz some countries that are developing them are scary.
I also never said the USA helps everyone, people are scaried of the USA which is why they are against us, big kids on the block always garner more attention.
😉
soleran30> Which is the only countrys administration EVER to have used nuclear weapons? Who supported Saddam Hussein during the Iran/iraqi-war? Who supported the Taliban in Afghanistan and armed the Mujahedin?
Baaaad policing there!
I'm not scared of the USA, I have friends over there. But, man, am I scared of its administration. And that some of that countries people, like you, are so brainwashed you don't mind if your government lies to you is even scarier.
Originally posted by The Omega
soleran30> Which is the only countrys administration EVER to have used nuclear weapons? Who supported Saddam Hussein during the Iran/iraqi-war? Who supported the Taliban in Afghanistan and armed the Mujahedin?
Baaaad policing there!
I'm not scared of the USA, I have friends over there. But, man, am I scared of its administration. And that some of that countries people, like you, are so brainwashed you don't mind if your government lies to you is even scarier.
The big brainwashing comes from people that dive into media far to often to come up with information, call me a svnic and you would be correct. So now brainwashing aside what would be a goal to achieve with the middle east since we are married to it due to WWII. Sit back and let bygones be bygones? No agendas change, goals change and when people fail to adjust to that does it become very scary.
Denmark isn't a world power and has minimal influence in International affairs, its easy to be small and have little impact on others it allows you to be critical of those that can and do sadly enough 😮
I think the point is still valid. Technically saying something is one thing. However, when you know full well that an entire nation (and planet beyond that) is operating under the assumption of the implication, why wait three years to call that assumption into question? Bush and company knew full well what they were doing and implying. The only reason they are denying it now is for political reasons. Political reasons that shouldn't be slightly considered when one takes into account the lives of both American and non-American soldiers that have died in this political/economic cluster-fu*k.
Originally posted by finti
USA is a large country but if you look into donation per capita US is far from the biggest doner
Perhaps but at the end of the day that doesn't matter to me, I do realize if the US lowers its total amount the UN will have budgetary problems.
Just sounds to me if they don't like what the biggest spender has to say they should downsize or find income from other participants.
And you are right Capt, I am not a rah rah rah Bush kinda guy however I can only hope (since I cannot read minds) that one of the major intentions was to take the war to someone elses backyard and not to keep it in the USA. LOL now try selling that to John Q Public in the USA🙂