I didn't say that!

Started by Hack Benjamin8 pages

Well then in all honusty it's better we attacked Saddam then Al-Quedia anyway.

Securalists suck, securalism leads to liberalism and liberalism leads to suffering..

Originally posted by Hack Benjamin
Well then in all honusty it's better we attacked Saddam then Al-Quedia anyway.

Securalists suck, securalism leads to liberalism and liberalism leads to suffering..

Do you actually believe the diahrrea that you spew?

it's better not to encourage him with logical arguments arach. that's why my response is gonna be absurdist

I have evidence to say otherwise... try this for a good read.

www.authorsden.com

Excerpt: "Saddam Hussein did harbor al Qaeda terrorists including Abdul Rahman Yasin, one of the al Qaeda terrorists in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, and Ahmed Hikmat Shakir, an Iraqi who was working at the Kuala Lumpur Airport after obtaining the job with an Iraqi intelligence officer's assistance, who participated in a January 2000 al-
Zarqawi's terror network in Fallujah."

evidence 2

"The AP is reporting that three Al Qaeda operatives have been captured in northern Iraq. This is the first known capture of Al Qaeda members in Iraq since the start of the insurgency."

A little more here- old but still accurate

"WASHINGTON — The United States has “solid evidence” senior al Qaeda operatives have been in Baghdad, Iraq"

-----I could make a very long list if i wanted too. No matter what Saddam did by deporting a few al-queda members just to make him look innocent no doubt, there was proof before that that says differently and I think people have forgotten it.

from reliable sources, and not including the oppotunists that ran right in after we destabalized the place.

Well if they ARENT a reliable source then who is? Saddam?

you gave me a rumsfeld quote, an editorial from an expert on china, and an AP article which in no way invalidates my argument.

Originally posted by Capt_Fantastic
If a direct implication wasn't intended, then why would he wait three years to put the misconception to rest?

The following quote is from a speech at the Renaissance Cleveland Hotel in Columbus, Ohio on March 20th 2006:

George W. Bush

First, just if I might correct a misperception. I don't think we ever said -- at least I know I didn't say that there was a direct connection between September the 11th and Saddam Hussein.

The following quote is from a letter to Congress on March 21st 2006:

George W. Bush

I have also determined that the use of armed force against Iraq is consistent with the United States and other countries continuing to take the necessary actions against international terrorists and terrorist organizations, including those nations, organiza-tions, or persons who planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001.

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Didn't actually go right into insulting, did I? It was, infact, the last thing I said.

Add to the fact that all I said was that he was quite stupid to produce such views and you have yourself (you) a drama queen.

-AC

I'm pretty sure all you said was "You sir are quite stupid".

😛

[QUOTE=6206743]Originally posted by Adam_PoE [B] We
[B/][QUOTE]

There in lies the problem

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
The following quote is from a speech at the Renaissance Cleveland Hotel in Columbus, Ohio on March 20th 2006:
Originally posted by Adam_PoE
The following quote is from a letter to Congress on March 21st 2006:
Originally posted by Adam_PoE
[B]We [B]
Originally posted by Capt_Fantastic

Originally posted by Capt_Fantastic

There in lies the problem

Originally posted by Hack Benjamin
...YOU ARE UN-AMERICAN! 😠 (The fact that you are English just happens to be convient.. 😛 )

😆 👆

AC, yes I grasp the gravity of the situation. I also realize that he is human, and like other humans he makes mistakes. Just like when Clinton made a "mistake" when he got his dick sucked by someone other than his wife.

btw: Why do YOU care about Bush? He's not your country's leader. You don't see me dissing Tony Blair, do you?

Because unless you've noticed, Blair "runs" my country.

Blair is also Bush's lapdog. Add one to one.

-AC

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Because unless you've noticed, Blair "runs" my country.

Blair is also Bush's lapdog. Add one to one.

-AC

Why doesn't Blair be a man and take care of his own business?

btw: Why do YOU care about Bush? He's not your country's leader. You don't see me dissing Tony Blair, do you?
one reason people care about and are pissed at Bush is becaiuse desicions made by him and his "buddies" effects the rest of the world

Why doesn't Blair be a man and take care of his own business?
why doesnt Bush keep his business within the US?

Originally posted by finti
one reason people care about and are pissed at Bush is becaiuse desicions made by him and his "buddies" effects the rest of the world

why doesnt Bush keep his business within the US?

Ever since Woodrow Wilson pulled the US out of isolationism for entry into WWI, the US has always been takin' care of bizznazz around the world.

Originally posted by DiamondBullets
Why doesn't Blair be a man and take care of his own business?

Hold on, I'll just ask him...

-AC

Ever since Woodrow Wilson pulled the US out of isolationism for entry into WWI, the US has always been takin' care of bizznazz around the world.
should the rest of the world accept their butting in wherever they feel like because of that ?