Given the fact that Luke was able to best Lomi Plo (who had potential-backup from a Nest of Killiks, could make herself invisible and defeated Mara Jade / Jacen in a lightsaber fight before) with a little flick of his wrist and knock Raynar (potential backup from 375 planets filled with Killiks / Joined people including force users) conciousless he might be able to knock Ulic off with a force attack and then battle Exar defeating him finally.
If both Ulic and Exar manage to enter melee combat with him he's most likely a dead man.
Given the fact that Luke was able to best Lomi Plo (who had potential-backup from a Nest of Killiks, could make herself invisible and defeated Mara Jade / Jacen in a lightsaber fight before) with a little flick of his wrist and knock Raynar (potential backup from 375 planets filled with Killiks / Joined people including force users) conciousless he might be able to knock Ulic off with a force attack and then battle Exar defeating him finally.
Given the fact that you've never quantified the benefit from merging with Killiks, this means jack shit and is nothing but meaningless feat wars.
Kun takes it alone.
IKC, somebody besides me is going to ask you to prove Kun can use his amulet so be ready for your display.
I've already done it and "somebody besides me" have signed off on it. One's refusal to address my points or even show that they read them is not indication of an invalid argument on my part.
Ulic gets curbstomped quickly and Kun and Luke have an epic battle with Luke coming out the victor more times than not.
Is this before or after Kun takes it alone?
Right, that includes yourself.
Six-year-old, schoolyard comeback?
It was quite obvious that great points were being brought up and in the end the favor was going to Luke,
Quite obvious to whom? You?
So far as I can tell, Janus, Illustrious, and Faunus disagreed.
you couldn't take that nor deal with it nor admit it
So where's your evidence or reasoning for this?
What's that? It's a hasty generalization and logical fallacy?
It's also begging the question, another logical fallacy?
Good job.
so you pulled a lightsnake and left.
And that's why I'm still here, hm?
Factual error. Self-ownage.
Originally posted by IKC
Six-year-old, schoolyard comeback?Quite obvious to whom? You?
So far as I can tell, Janus, Illustrious, and Faunus disagreed.
So where's your evidence or reasoning for this?
What's that? It's a hasty generalization and logical fallacy?
It's also begging the question, another logical fallacy?
Good job.
And that's why I'm still here, hm?
Factual error. Self-ownage.
English lesson..
That includes yourself=factual statement with evidence.
Show me where Janus, Faunus, and Illustrious disagreed, because unlike you I Am reading that thread while you're hesitant to bring it back. What's that? Oh everything you're bringing up is irrelevant to reality? Way to live in a dream world Neo, youre right, self ownage..
Originally posted by Faunus
Stow it already with the ''zOMg! ur a fanboy1'' IKC, unlike any of you, as actually provided proof for his stance. And so far, I haven't seen anyone successfully beat them down. So until you can do so, stfu.
Originally posted by Illustrious
You're missing the point. I picked a side in this debate, and I made my points.I argued that because Kun created his own style and beat down the best of an order of [b]thousands
(Not hundreds like Luke's order) of force users with apparent ease is more impressive than Luke's lightsaber feats and unknown form. It's up to the Luke supporters to counter this point.I don't have to counter my own points or it would be redundant.[/B]
Originally posted by Wesker
And I don't get all angry when people make Luke uber, although I have good reason to be skeptical. You've been deliberately antagonistic towards IKC and myself for us holding views and supporting them, while you've provided next to nothing yourself. Glentract's also notorious for being Luke-biased, and his arguments are always sketchy and easily unraveled. So the problem I have isn't with the conclusion; it's how it's reached and how I'm getting it. I'm not in this to glorify Kun. You may not believe that, but it's true. I'm trying to make sure everyone stays on the same damn page though, because IKC has provided his proof, I've gone over it, and Illustrious has. It may not be 100% in Kun's favor against Luke. Hell, it might not even be 75%. New evidence might pop up that would make Luke pwn every sith lord known. But for now, with what we have, I've made my decision. And I've supported it, along with others.