V for...Very close to the truth

Started by Deano4 pages

V for...Very close to the truth

Spoilers ahead

Hello all ...

I watched V for Vendetta this week, the latest film by the Wachowski brothers, the makers of the Matrix trilogy. If you haven't seen it yet, you might like to see this trailer before you read on ...
http://vforvendetta.warnerbros.com/index2.html

From what I have been reading in the UK in the last few days, the film, and the Wachowski screenplay, have had quite a savaging from 'the critics'. One newspaper headline called it 'V for Vacuous' and the review said it was 'barking mad'.
But movies and art in general are not owned by the critics, nor even by their creators, except in the sense of copyright. What they are, and what they mean, belong to the observer. It doesn't even matter if what we see is not what the creator intended. When it enters our universe the meaning is ours and ours alone. We own the imagination rights.
From that perspective I liked V for Vendetta very much as a symbolic exposure of the world we are entering so fast - and what it will take for us to dramatically change direction.
The film was inspired by the graphic novel of the same name, written by Allan Moore and David Lloyd. Moore said the adaptation was 'imbecilic' and demanded that his name did not appear in the closing credits. Lloyd, however, likes the treatment and says that Moore would only be content if it had been a mirror of the book.
It is set a few years from now in a fascist Britain viciously ruled by a dictator called High Chancellor Adam Sutler, the leader of a party known as Norsefire. The parallels with George Orwell's 1984 are obvious as the Big Brother High Chancellor appears on giant TV screens telling his underlings and the largely subservient population what they will and will not do.
Weaved into the plot are many references to current events, and the torture at a prison, which the film calls calls 'Larkhill', is a clear reference to places like Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo Bay. The prisoners even wear the orange suits, although the story is set in Britain, not the United States. There is actually a real Larkhill military camp in Wiltshire, England, which is home to a School of Artillery for the British army. The High Chancellor dictatorship also has the double cross symbol of the Illuminati House of Lorraine, often noted in my books.

The High Chancellor speaks amid the double crosses

The dictatorship in the film came to power when 100,000 people were killed after a deadly virus was released in a water treatment plant and a school. It later emerges that it was the High Chancellor's forces who released the virus (developed through human experiments at Larkhill) as a problem-reaction-solution to justify total power to 'protect the people'. The agent who discovers the truth says to a colleague: 'If our own government was responsible for the deaths of a hundred thousand people ... would you really want to know?

Agents discover that their own government was behind the disaster used to justify absolute power

When the fascist control comes under challenge, the High Chancellor tells his council to 'remind the public why they need us' and the government-controlled television station, the 'British Television Network', then reports that Avian Flu is a pandemic. A similar structure is operated by the Illuminati, which the High Chancellor and co symbolise.

The slogan of the dictatorship is 'unity', which is often called in today's politics 'consensus'. Decoded, it means 'everyone doing and thinking what we say'.

There are curfews and cameras everywhere 'for your protection' and these are themes, not only of Orwell's classic, but of our society today as governments constantly parrot the need to take our freedoms away to protect us and, ironically, to protect our freedoms.
The 'Agent Smiths' of the Matrix and the government security thugs of today are called the 'fingermen' in V for Vendetta. They are the psychopathic numbskulls who police the people with no regard to fairness and justice. The only laws are the ones they decide in the moment and whatever they do there are no consequences. Far fetched? Well, in London, the city in which the film is set, an innocent Brazilian electrician was shot by police seven times in the head while being held to the floor and those responsible are still at large, not a single one of them charged.
The impositions of the State and its system servers are already targeting the fine detail of our lives. Recently in the UK, a guy was fined 50 Pounds for putting rubbish in a street litter bin because the litter was two pieces of junk mail that were said to constitute 'domestic refuse'. He was fined for 'misuse of a public bin'. Then there was the couple fined for feeding wild birds after council officials hid in bushes to 'catch them'. An 82-year-old woman was even ordered to remove her rain hat in a pub 'for security reasons' because it was claimed to 'restrict close circuit camera coverage'.
These might sound trivial and ludicrous examples to some, but it is in the apparently minor and insignificant that can be seen the true extent to which the State in all its forms has infiltrated our lives.

In the opening scene of V for Vendetta, three of the fingermen are about to rape Evey, an assistant at the British Television Network, when the film's 'hero', V, arrives on the scene and kills them. He is wearing a mask depicting Guy Fawkes, who was hung for attempting to blow up Parliament in 1605. The mask is more than symbolic. It hides V's burned features, the result from imprisonment, torture and fire at the Larkhill detention centre.
V is on a vendetta to kill all those who tortured him and to bring down the dictatorship by destroying the buildings symbolic of its power. These include the Old Bailey laws courts and, ultimately, the Houses of Parliament. The aim is to trigger a popular uprising by the oppressed people and his motto is: 'People should not be afraid of their governments, governments should be afraid of their people.'

As with the Matrix, there is some gruesome violence in the name of freedom when freedom is never won by violence. Freedom apparently 'won' by violence always ushers in another version of dictatorship and oppression. V believes that 'the only verdict is vengeance. The vendetta.'. But Evey disagrees:

Evey: 'You're getting back at them for what they did to you.'
V: 'What was done to me was monstrous'.
Evey: 'And they created a monster'.

Meeting violence with violence is a battle between two expressions of the same insanity. Tony Blair, or 'Oxymoron Man', once memorably used the term 'fighting for peace' when trying to justify the slaughter in Iraq. It is true that the need to avenge and punish in the name of 'justice' succeeds only in turning the avenger into that he seeks to avenge.
That whole 'eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth', thing has always bewildered me. It's like when the State says that killing is wrong yet has a law that allows it to kill the killer. The answer is not vengeance for those who would do us harm. That is not a solution to injustice, it is a life sentence for the vengeful.

V and the High Chancellor ... violence + violence = violence doubled

In V for Vengeance, the secret police who impose the will of the High Chancellor may be set slightly in the future, but they are already with us today targeting and torturing all those who refuse to cower and comply. In fact, they have always been with us, back to the Inquisition and way beyond. As V says: 'Fear became the ultimate tool of this government.'.
But the movie is not just a metaphor for a UK dictatorship, it is representative of the methods and ambitions of those who control governments across the world. And they all use fear, not just as their 'ultimate tool', but the first, second and last. Everything they do is based on fear.
The Evey character says at one point: 'I wish I wasn't afraid all the time'. But most people are, that's the idea. We fear the past, present and future. We fear the unknown, we fear not having enough, losing what we have, not having what we want. We fear what will become of us and those that we care for. We fear what others think of us and what they don't think of us. We fear, fear, fear and therefore we are controllable through the manipulation of all that we fear. The present War on Terror is the War of Fear. No Fear, no control.
Evey is eventually arrested for her connection to V and tortured and interrogated at Larkhill. There is a twist to this in the film, but it is not relevant here. Anyone who watched the documentary, The Road to Guantanamo, featured in a recent newsletter, will know that what is portrayed in the fictional Larkhill is already happening across the world every day.

It's only a movie....

In her cell, Evey finds a letter from a previous prisoner hidden in a crevice in the wall. What she reads gives her the inspiration to let go of that which really imprisons her, imprisons us all - fear. It says:

I don't know who you are. Please believe. There is no way I can convince you that this is not one of their tricks. But I don't care. I am me, and I don't know who you are, but I love you.

I have a pencil. A little one they did not find. I am a woman. I hid it inside me. Perhaps I won't be able to write again, so this is a long letter about my life. It is the only autobiography I have ever written and oh God I'm writing it on toilet paper.

I was born in Nottingham in 1957, and it rained a lot. I passed my eleven plus and went to girl's Grammar. I wanted to be an actress.
I met my first girlfriend at school. Her name was Sara. She was fourteen and I was fifteen but we were both in Miss Watson's class. Her wrists. Her wrists were beautiful. I sat in biology class, staring at the picket rabbit foetus in its jar, listening while Mr. Hird said it was an adolescent phase that people outgrew. Sara did. I didn't.

In 1976 I stopped pretending and took a girl called Christine home to meet my parents. A week later I enrolled at drama college. My mother said I broke her heart.
But it was my integrity that was important. Is that so selfish? It sells for so little, but it's all we have left in this place. It is the very last inch of us. But within that inch we are free.

London. I was happy in London. In 1981 I played Dandini in Cinderella. My first rep work. The world was strange and rustling and busy, with invisible crowds behind the hot lights and all that breathless glamour. It was exciting and it was lonely. At nights I'd go to the Crew-Ins or one of the other clubs. But I was stand-offish and didn't mix easily. I saw a lot of the scene, but I never felt comfortable there. So many of them just wanted to be gay. It was their life, their ambition. And I wanted more than that.

Work improved. I got small film roles, then bigger ones. In 1986 I starred in 'The Salt Flats'. It pulled in the awards but not the crowds. I met Ruth while working on that. We loved each other. We lived together and on Valentine's Day she sent me roses and, oh God, we had so much. Those were the best three years of my life.

In 1988 there was the war, and after that there were no more roses. Not for anybody.

In 1992 they started rounding up the gays. They took Ruth while she was out looking for food. Why are they so frightened of us? They burned her with cigarette ends and made her give them my name. She signed a statement saying I'd seduced her. I didn't blame her. God, I loved her. I didn't blame her.

But she did. She killed herself in her cell. She couldn't live with betraying me, with giving up that last inch. Oh Ruth. . . .

They came for me. They told me that all of my films would be burned. They shaved off my hair and held my head down a toilet bowl and told jokes about lesbians. They brought me here and gave me drugs. I can't feel my tongue anymore. I can't speak.

The other gay women here, Rita, died two weeks ago. I imagine I'll die quite soon. It's strange that my life should end in such a terrible place, but for three years I had roses and I apologized to nobody.
I shall die here. Every last inch of me shall perish. Except one.

An inch. It's small and it's fragile and it's the only thing in the world worth having. We must never lose it, or sell it, or give it away. We must never let them take it from us.

I don't know who you are. Or whether you're a man or a woman. I may never see you or cry with you or get drunk with you. But I love you. I hope that you escape this place. I hope that the world turns and that things get better, and that one day people have roses again. I wish I could kiss you.''
...........

That 'last inch', that 'integrity that sells for so little', is the essence of who we are. We are not our bodies, not even our minds, emotions and thoughts. They are all programs and, therefore, programmable. We are that infinite essence, that connection to All That Is, beyond the vibrational walls of this illusory and delusory reality. Call it soul, call it whatever, it the part of us they cannot break, for it is unbreakable, unprogrammable, unintimidatable.

Fear is the absence of what I call Infinite Love. Forget the mechanical, electrochemical, intellectual state that passes for 'love' in this reality. The two do not compare. Infinite Love, the 'last inch' they can never have, is not the love of attraction, of beauty, of mind and personality. It is love for everything, for everyone, forever. There are no exceptions, no favourites, for in the vastness of forever, what we do not love is always ourselves. How can it not be when we are everything and, thus, everything we love and everything we don't?
How do we access, consciously become, this essence, this true and ultimate 'I'? We stop being frightened. We stop bowing to fear. It is that which entraps us in the illusions of the Matrix, holds us in the low vibrational state of our manipulated five-sense reality.
Fear is the prison, its absence is the key.

What we need is the understanding and the will to change the reality that manifests as control and suppression and this can never be done while we are imprisoned by fear. Freedom from fear is freedom itself.

Valerie under interogation

Inspired by reading Valerie's letter, Evey is given one last chance to inform on V or face the firing squad. How many have succumbed through fear of death, fear of the unknown?
The interrogator tells her fate if she doesn't tell them what they want:
'You must tell us the identity or whereabouts of code-name V. Do you understand what I'm telling you?'
'Yes.'
'Are you ready to cooperate?'
'No.'

We cannot be controlled, forced or intimidated when we are no longer in fear.

Evey is not killed because of the twist I mentioned and when V dies Evey takes over the mantle. An Internet review of V for Vendetta picks up the change that now takes place when love replaces vengeance:
'This is why Evey becomes V at the end of the story. (V for "Evey".) As an idea, as a force, the original V can only do so much. He can rebel against The System, he can awaken the value of Valerie's One Inch to the populace, but once that is achieved, he no longer has a purpose. So Evey steps in, picking up where V left off. She continues the cycle--as V adopted the guise of Guy Fawkes, Evey adopts the guise of V, continuing his spirit while becoming something more than he could ever have been. "I will not lead them. But I'll help them build. Help them create where I'll not help them kill. The age of killers is no more". The first V was a killer, a destroyer, in both the figurative and literal sense. But the next V, Evey, will be a teacher, a builder.'
Before his death, V sends thousands of his Guy Fawkes masks to Londoners and so reported sightings of him are everywhere. Eventually hordes of masked people march on Westminster and through the lines of armed soldiers who choose not to shoot after not receiving orders from the now dead High Chancellor.

This, for me, was the most profound part of the film, symbolic of the power that we have together when we cease to fall for the age-old scam of 'divide 'em and rule 'em'. As George Orwell said in 1984:
'But the proles, if only they could somehow become conscious of their own strength, would have no reason to conspire. They needed only to rise up and shake themselves, like a horse shaking off flies. If they chose, they could blow the party to pieces tomorrow morning. Surely, sooner or later, it must occur to them to do it. And yet ...'
Even more powerful in my view was when the crowds removed the masks, no longer in fear of identification, and allowed the world to see who they were.

The human race may not wear Guy Fawkes masks, but they do wear a face that isn't them as they hide themselves behind identikit personas. The faces they put to the world are not who they are, but who they think they are expected to be and fear not to be.
As V tells one of the fascist agents ... 'Beneath this mask there is more than flesh. There is an idea, Mr. Creedy, and ideas are bullet-proof.'
It mirrors the words of Victor Hugo: 'There is nothing more powerful than an idea whose time has come.'
Quite so. And the idea is called '. freedom'

So your basic point is that the only way to obtain freedom is by using Terrorist methods.

Right, Deano?

Whew...this movie sounds too complicated. I think I'll wait for Vendetta 2: Viva Las Vegas

Where did you copy that from deano? And read the comic, it's excellent.

Originally posted by WrathfulDwarf
So your basic point is that the only way to obtain freedom is by using Terrorist methods.

Right, Deano?

actually it states that violence isnt the answer. try reading it..all of it🙂

That was long... I guess you have a point that the people who made the movie were trying to relate to the real world politics today, but I dont know if 'violence isnt the answer' is what they were trying to depict in the movie- considering how violent it is.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Where did you copy that from deano? And read the comic, it's excellent.

Alan Moore is excellent in general.
To bad Hollywood has a habbit of raping his work...like From Hell 😬

Originally posted by Slay
Alan Moore is excellent in general.
To bad Hollywood has a habbit of raping his work...like From Hell 😬

Yeah...he asked for his name to be taken from the end credits...which is hilarious cause it now says "Based on teh Graphic Novel illustrated by David Lloyd"

Originally posted by Bardock42
Yeah...he asked for his name to be taken from the end credits...which is hilarious cause it now says "Based on teh Graphic Novel illustrated by David Lloyd"

😆

Imagine people walking from the cinema,wondering who wrote the ''script'' for that Graphic Novel.Because I don't 😐

Originally posted by The Black Ghost
That was long... I guess you have a point that the people who made the movie were trying to relate to the real world politics today, but I dont know if 'violence isnt the answer' is what they were trying to depict in the movie- considering how violent it is.

violence is the answer to certain people. the writer of the article isnt saying that the movie 'doesnt condone violence, thats not what he is saying.

the person who wrote that article is saying that violence ISNT the answer. but the film is very close to the truth in other aspects.

Originally posted by Slay
😆

Imagine people walking from the cinema,wondering who wrote the ''script'' for that Graphic Novel.Because I don't 😐


You don't imagine, you don't wonder or you didn' write it?

And still, Deano, where did you get that from? You didn't just type it, everyone knows that.

Originally posted by Bardock42
You don't imagine, you don't wonder or you didn' write it?

And still, Deano, where did you get that from? You didn't just type it, everyone knows that.


Wikipedia...Possibly.Maybe I should search V for Vendetta on Wiki ...

Another Deano copy/paste thread? Doesn't this belong in the Movies Forum or the conspiracy thread?

I'm assuming half of what you wrote are opinions, Deano.

The High Chancellor dictatorship also has the double cross symbol of the Illuminati House of Lorraine, often noted in my books.

Why Deano, I didn't know you were a published author.

Is this with spoilers ? Cause i aint reading that.

my friend sent it me through email. the author is david icke.

wowwhatasurprise 😐