Naga Sadow vs Darth Revan, DE Sidious and NJO Luke

They are pretty damn heavy.

Interesting tidbit... Here in this page, Naga Sadow thrusts his blade effortlessly into the table that is the centerpiece of the Sith Lord council chamber.

Later on, Ludo Kressh breaks his blade on the very same surface, only striking it sideways.

I wonder... was this because of raw strength used, or perhaps it was more Force than physical hitting that made it shatter like glass?

Either way they are still physically more powerful to every other Jedi/Sith after them

Agreed.

Originally posted by tdtd
Either way they are still physically more powerful to every other Jedi/Sith after them

What about Vader?

Yeah, they're stronger than Vader too.

Really? You think?

Yeah. They put their sith swords straight through walls when fighting...

Damn I've read GAOTS 50 or so times and I failed to see that part when they put the swords through the walls.. I wonder if those sith swords could cut through lightsabers.

No, but it'd be pretty much impossible to block such a blow with a lightsaber, unless your Grievous, Vader, or possibly Bane.

Well what I meant was in a lightsaber duel the ancient sith would just drive anybody back with their force.

Pretty much. Although duelists like Luke, Yoda, and Exar Kun would likely be fast enough to maneuver around and through almost any ancient Sith who'd recklessly try to mash them with a sword, although I doubt warriors like Ragnos would make such a mistake.

A faster weapon is always better then a more powerful one. Sith swords are completely overrrated. Any decent saber duelist would be able to outduel any duelist like Ragnos, Kressh, Simus or Sadow. It would just be too easy for the saber duelist to use the weight of the opponent's sith sword against the user. And if Sadow and Kressh could really swing sabers around so easily, don't you think that they would not have had to use two hands to wield it.

Originally posted by thetruepower
A faster weapon is always better then a more powerful one. Sith swords are completely overrrated. Any decent saber duelist would be able to outduel any duelist like Ragnos, Kressh, Simus or Sadow. It would just be too easy for the saber duelist to use the weight of the opponent's sith sword against the user. And if Sadow and Kressh could really swing sabers around so easily, don't you think that they would not have had to use two hands to wield it.

zOMG, a katana is a two-handed weapon, it must suck!

zOMG, an assault rifle is a two-handed weapon, it must also suck!

zOMG, most Jedi use two-handed lightsaber forms, it must suck!

zOMG, I don't know anything about t3h fizix, I am 10 years old!

[/numan]

Good job.

Way to sum up what I said moron.

Numan, what you said was moronic.

Please explain how it was moronic? It makes sense that any decent duelist would be able to out duel a duelist who wields a sith sword. Faster weapons are always greater then heavy weapons. And there is no evidence that suggests that the sith lords could wield these swords as easily as sabers apart from in Kressh's and Sadow's duel where they leave "residual energy" behind every swing of their blade. And comic book exaggerations are no better then game play inconsistencies. Also note that if they were able to swing their swords like sabers, they would likely just use one hand to wield it and the other hand for offensive force powers just like Dooku did with his saber.

Originally posted by thetruepower
Way to sum up what I said moron.

Defensive already, good job.

So let me get what you said:

Numan: "Because Ludo Kressh and Naga Sadow swing with two hands, the sword sucks."

Uh huh, and I made about 3 different examples why what you said was retarded. Keep it up man.

And of course there's your quote that says this:

Numan: "There's no evidence to suggest they swing their swords as fast as a lightsaber."

Only there is, except you decide to rule it out as "comic book exaggerations." I like that you think your opinion is canon, but unfortunately, it's not. Let me guess, Sadow didn't really say that speech bubble, it's another comic book exaggeration! Genius, NASA might come aknockin' at your door.

Originally posted by Illustrious
zOMG, a katana is a two-handed weapon, it must suck!

zOMG, an assault rifle is a two-handed weapon, it must also suck!

zOMG, most Jedi use two-handed lightsaber forms, it must suck!

zOMG, I don't know anything about t3h fizix, I am 10 years old!

[/numan]

Good job.

You obviously seriously lack reading comprehension skills. My point was that it is unlikely that they could swing their swords around just like sabers as they needed both hands to wield the sword. I was not implying that sith swords suck because they require both hands to wield.

Numan, go away.

Originally posted by Illustrious
Defensive already, good job.

So let me get what you said:

Because Ludo Kressh and Naga Sadow swing with two hands, the sword sucks.

Uh huh, and I made about 3 different examples why what you said was retarded. Keep it up man.

Originally posted by thetruepower
You obviously seriously lack reading comprehension skills. My point was that it is unlikely that they could swing their swords around just like sabers as they needed both hands to wield the sword. I was not implying that sith swords suck because they require both hands to wield.