Originally posted by Wesker
Apparently the brain of the socking Numan sucks; having that kind of power implies speed behind the blade. No one swings a blade superslow and digs it half a foot into a solid stone table, dipshit.
Wrong again Janus. Not much speed is required at all to generate lots of power. Obviously some speed is required, but not anything exceptional.
Originally posted by thetruepower
Power is basically force/time taken. Speed clearly helps, but if enough force can be put into the attack, great power can still be generated without the need of speed.
So you basically admitted that the Sith put incredible force into their attacks. Thanks.
Then you see the scan where they leave afterimages, blurs, and residual energy. Guess they have speed too.
Whoops, good job.
Err no Illustrious. I proved that speed is not required to generate great power. That was in reply to Wesker's incorrect conclusion that speed is always vital to generate mass power. And in response to "So you basically admitted that the Sith put incredible force into their attacks. Thanks." I have never once said that the ancient sith did not put great power into attacks. I have always said that while they have great power behind their attacks, they lack speed and agility and general manoeuvrability to duel against top notch jedi. And in response to "Then you see the scan where they leave afterimages, blurs, and residual energy. Guess they have speed too", the residual energy is a result of the power behind the two blades clashing.
Originally posted by thetruepower
Err no Illustrious. I proved that speed is not required to generate great power. That was in reply to Wesker's incorrect conclusion that speed is always vital to generate mass power. And in response to "So you basically admitted that the Sith put incredible force into their attacks. Thanks." I have never once said that the ancient sith did not put great power into attacks. I have always said that while they have great power behind their attacks, they lack speed and agility and general manoeuvrability to duel against top notch jedi. And in response to "Then you see the scan where they leave afterimages, blurs, and residual energy. Guess they have speed too", the residual energy is a result of the power behind the two blades clashing.
Do you read?
Originally posted by Illustrious
Who's the "Antideluvian"? Way to spell! A real go-getter.Do slow objects leave blur marks? Afterimages?
So the sith swing their swords really slow, they just leave residual energy, blur marks, and afterimages; nothing fast leaves those behind! Oh wait...
You can't even spell "momentum" without losing letters, don't have a clue what torque is, act like your opinion is canon, and somehow think someone else sucks. Woo! Hypocrisy has a partner, meet Numan!
And you criticize other people's comprehension.
Really, the residual energy is a result of the power? Where's your proof of that?
Are the blur marks a result of power too? The afterimages? Please.
"And you criticize other people's comprehension.
Really, the residual energy is a result of the power? Where's your proof of that?
Are the blur marks a result of power too? The afterimages? Please."
There is no more proof that the residual energy is caused by the speed of the blades then there is proof that the residual energy is a result of two blades of such great power colliding.
And please explain how my reading comprehension was sub-par in anything that I have said in this thread.
Originally posted by thetruepower
"And you criticize other people's comprehension.Really, the residual energy is a result of the power? Where's your proof of that?
Are the blur marks a result of power too? The afterimages? Please."
There is no more proof that the residual energy is caused by the speed of the blades then there is proof that the residual energy is a result of two blades of such great power colliding.
And please explain how my reading comprehension was sub-par in anything that I have said in this thread.
"There's no more proof" of one way or the other, yet you say it's from the power, not the speed.
Right, like I said, I think I just proved that you use your own opinion as evidence. We're done here.
Originally posted by thetruepower
There is no more proof that the residual energy is caused by the speed of the blades then there is proof that the residual energy is a result of two blades of such great power colliding.And please explain how my reading comprehension was sub-par in anything that I have said in this thread. [/B]
You can see the blades leaving blurs and afterimages. There you have proof of speed. And if two blades that are moved with great speed collide you can't go and say "OMGosh tha enagi muscht com from da powa - no sschpeeeeed involved."
Conclusion: STFU, n00b.
Ok but we have still established that there is no evidence that states the ancient sith could swing their swords faster then sabers. So basically we have clarified that they have nothing but power on their side in duels. Not speed. Power. And any good saber duelist would be able to compete with a duelist that only has power and lacks speed.
And you say that I of all people use my own opinion and pass it off as fact. Sorry to dissapoint you Illustrious but you are a complete hypocrite as it was always you and the rest of the Ragnos crew who believed that the ancient sith were able to swing their blades around like sabers. And you had no real proof (as I have just proven) yet people like Arker and TDTD use that pice of info and claim that it true because you and the Ragnos crew said so.
Originally posted by thetruepower
Ok but we have still established that there is no evidence that states the ancient sith could swing their swords faster then sabers. So basically we have clarified that they have nothing but power on their side in duels. Not speed. Power. And any good saber duelist would be able to compete with a duelist that only has power and lacks speed.And you say that I of all people use my own opinion and pass it off as fact. Sorry to dissapoint you Illustrious but you are a complete hypocrite as it was always you and the rest of the Ragnos crew who believed that the ancient sith were able to swing their blades around like sabers. And you had no real proof (as I have just proven) yet people like Arker and TDTD use that pice of info and claim that it true because you and the Ragnos crew said so.
They don't LACK SPEED or they wouldn't leave afterimages and blur marks.
Got it?
Thanks.
You haven't prove anything. Point out specifically what you have proven. As I showed you just last post, you take your own opinion and try to use it as fact.
Okay, blur marks and afterimages do not establish speed. Sure thing, keep living in Numan-canon.
Originally posted by Borbarad
You can [b]see the blades leaving blurs and afterimages. There you have proof of speed. And if two blades that are moved with great speed collide you can't go and say "OMGosh tha enagi muscht com from da powa - no sschpeeeeed involved."Conclusion: STFU, n00b. [/B]
It's quite an assumption to call those afterimages. I mean please, they could just as likely be the same residual energy for all we know and calling them afterimages is just a guess which the poor artwork doesn't really allow. If they really were afterimages, why have they not been done in any of the other boxes. It is just a result of terrible artwork and there is little to suggest that they are afterimages when they could as easily be the same residual energy in the previous boxes. And also don't you think that they would make it pretty obvious if they really were afterimages.
And let's say that they were. Have you never come across comic book exaggeraton. Think back to the first issue of KOTOR where Ulic faces that battle droid. There are after images of him as he fights the droid. Does this imply that he is as fast as Yoda?