Originally posted by Trickster
This situation seems a bit out of control.If it's such a problem thatthe immigrants and their supporters are trying to pass a law that would make them all legal, and the anti-immigration groups are trying to toughen up both immigration laws and border patrols, then why not give that guest-worker status to those illegal immigrants who can pass some basic level entry exams (for example, english speaking and reading/writing)? Instead of granting them sudden citizenship, initiate a program that all the illegal immigrants in the country can apply for which is simply a test. Then toughen up on immigration laws: maybe even pass that law about employing illegals. Some illegals would be deported (those that didn't apply for citizenship or those that failed to meet entry requirements) but the majority would pass, I suspect.
The 'bottom-feeder' jobs would still be held by the same people, but any new illegal immigrants would be deported. Loosening up on immigration applications but coming down harder on law-breakers would encourage people to go through legal channels.
I can see why it would anger people that illegal immigrants seem to break the law for little punishment (and perhaps even the reward of citizenship), but I don't really see the point of those who are arguing for the immigrants. Fair enough, the system may be a bad one, but breaking the law in such extreme numbers isn't the democratic way to go about changing it. Illegal immigrants are exactly that - illegal - and if someone wants the law to change, merely breaking it repeatedly and being proud of such actions is not the best way to go about it. Illegal immigrants have broken the law, and do not deserve a reward for it, no matter what someone's emotional or family connection to them is.
Fairness principle - He who cuts in line should be made to go to the back of the line.