Spam Thread Merge

Originally posted by kgkg
This is not what I had in mind... This is not a good thread to discuss Thor vs Superman. Do you want to make a new thread to discuss this?... I plan on doing a full low end/average Thor showing while you can do this for Superman. ---- The point of doing that will be to show that Thor on average has a lot more low end-average showing than Superman... If you agree with this than there is no point of the thread. I will make a thread later if you agree<or you can make one>. But I will need some time to organize a full scale scans of all Thor's low showing etc.

Then what do you have in mind?

Those are Thor and Superman's lowest showing barring the few I forgot like Superman being slashed open by a small alien bug or Thor being knocked out by the mortar shell albeit after going through some trials.

Do you just want to add scans for impact or something?

Bullshit. Superman has his fair share of unimpressive showings.

Originally posted by kgkg
Which one did I miss?

All of them, listing other possible reasons for the actions doesn't mean that my reasons were wrong.

Originally posted by Silent Master
You can't have it both ways, either it was a tough fight or all it takes to ko a fresh Superman is two hits from Ironman/Simon.

Originally posted by carver9
WTF...Superman has never destroyed anything planetary. Moon, you might have a argument but he had to ramb it in order to destroy it and was badly injured.

Gladiator could have flown to the shadow moon and punched it to dust.

Nice how I can always rely on you to cherry pick low showings to suit your argument. 👆

Originally posted by Simbon
Like Werner Herzog, I have no sense of irony, so you will have to explain that to me.

:

Originally posted by Simbon
No, Phil is right; remember that the marvel characters have to be judged by their AVERAGES -- their low feats have to be taken into account. Contrast this with superman (whose low feats are all PIS, and therefore not taken into account), and it is clear who is teh strongest wun der iz.

Just in the sense that most of the time, it's the opposite way around on this board.

Originally posted by -Pr-

Just in the sense that most of the time, it's the opposite way around on this board.

I'm not sure if it's the opposite way most of the time, but I think it may appear that way because the boosters of certain marvel characters (mohawked, skrull-chinned, or otherwise) are sometimes...more persistent than the DCers. Though the threads here tend to focus more on marvel characters, I think the "DC>Marvel" people may even slightly outnumber the "Marvel>DC" contingent.

Originally posted by Colossus-Big C
based on feats .

Thor-destroy a planet by hitting it with mljonir
Herculese-bench pressed the weigth of the earth
Gladiator-destroyed a planet much bigger than earth, destroy a star etc
Hulk-physically overpowered a planet from exploding, destroying a planet twice the size of earth with a punch, and can basically out muscle everyone in this thread.

They are weaker. Thor destroyed a PLANETOID with mljonir is garbage.

Hercules never lifted the weight of the Earth. The proof is in the answer to this question, "What would happen if Hercules let go?"

Gladiator destroyer a planet with a few punches is garbage too.

Hulk holding a planet together is garbage.
And destroyed a huge planetoid is also garbage.

None of these feats comes close to even lifting 1 Earth weight of force, for it takes far less force to destroy a planet than to accelerate it beyond 'g'.
Superman has quantifiable feats that are beyond 50 Earth weights of force.

get out of here idiot

^ Looks like somebody needs to be shown with maff.

nobody tried to move earth in marvel, so he can shove it up his ass

If superman KOING himself ramming a moon is a low showing????? What is him getting koed by a gas station explosion called????.. Superman was simply not strong enough to destroy that moon without building up all the mass he could and then ramming that moon. All on panel. I wish it was superman that destroyed that planet, asteriod and held that planet together and hulk and gladiator koed themselves ramming a moon. Boy would that would expose a lot.

Originally posted by DIAMONDBACK-777
If superman KOING himself ramming a moon is a low showing????? What is him getting koed by a gas station explosion called????.. Superman was simply not strong enough to destroy that moon without building up all the mass he could and then ramming that moon. All on panel. I wish it was superman that destroyed that planet, asteriod and held that planet together and hulk and gladiator koed themselves ramming a moon. Boy would that would expose a lot.

Hhhmm... good point. If it was the other way around, Gladiator not being able to destroy a moon, it would be used against him and Hulk as well. I agree with this 100%.

Never thought about it like that.

i actually agree with that, if hulk or gladiator koed themselves by punching the moon it would be used against them far wrost the superman

Like Hulk being beaten to shit by Zeus had to be some sort of trick or plot device? Bias works both way you guys just choose to ignore that fact

Carver, its amazing to me that people will try and downplay the size of that planet gladiator destroyed or cry flight assist on hulks asteriod feat and then turn around and call supermans feat of koing himself ramming a moon a "low showing " because the moon was a lot smaller than the planet and asteriod. All because they cannot accept the fact that hulk and gladiator are stronger than superman.

i wouldnt say there stronger, just in the same league

.

Manhunter easy

Originally posted by DIAMONDBACK-777
Carver, its amazing to me that people will try and downplay the size of that planet gladiator destroyed or cry flight assist on hulks asteriod feat and then turn around and call supermans feat of koing himself ramming a moon a "low showing " because the moon was a lot smaller than the planet and asteriod. All because they cannot accept the fact that hulk and gladiator are stronger than superman.

I agree with this as well. I have basically just accepted what people tend to throw off and sometimes ignore them throwing off feats to down Hulk or Gladiator.

IMO... Gladiator at his standard levels is pretty much equal to Superman but his powers is kind of like Hulk in a different manner. The more confident he is, the stronger he becomes (which was shown during his fight against Vulcan).

He also showed this when he fought Supreme. Supreme was classified as being 4 times stronger than Gladiator but Gladiator was able to amp himself to match Supreme physically and stalemated him. Hell, their fight was so powerful that it was classified as being capable of detroying worlds if the fight continued.

Hulk IMO is the strongest mentioned in this thread unless people ignore "facts".

FACT... Savage Hulk was able to stalemate Thor for hours.

FACT... Rulk ran through ODIN FORCE THOR.

FACT... Thor was useless against Onslaught.

The moral of what I said is...

Current Hulk is far more powerful than his Savage Hulk persona... the one that stalemated Thor for hours.

2. Current Hulk treated Rulk like a toy... the same Rulk that ran through OF Thor.

3. Hulk completely ripped through Onslaught like he was nothing and this is the same Onslaught that Thor was useless against and the Hulk that fought Onslaught isn't as poweful as current Hulk.

Thor is pretty much equal to Supes and Current Hulk is superior to Thor physically.

All of this is common sense.

Originally posted by psycho gundam
get out of here idiot

Originally posted by Harbinger
^ Looks like somebody needs to be shown with maff.

Originally posted by psycho gundam
nobody tried to move earth in marvel, so he can shove it up his ass

LMFAO!!! PSYCHO!!

Originally posted by iceman24567
Like Hulk being beaten to shit by Zeus had to be some sort of trick or plot device? Bias works both way you guys just choose to ignore that fact

What's the point of this post? Thor recently got beaten by his father in 2 panels. Zeus and Odin are skyfathers so you using them as a low showing means crap.