"In the fishes' forward fins, the scientists found evidence of limbs in the making. There are the beginnings of digits, proto-wrists, elbows and shoulders. The fish also had a flat skull resembling a crocodile's, a neck, ribs and other parts that were similar to four-legged land animals known as tetrapods."
"In the fishes' forward fins, the scientists found evidence of limbs in the making. There are the beginnings of digits, proto-wrists, elbows and shoulders. The fish also had a flat skull resembling a crocodile's, a neck, ribs and other parts that were similar to four-legged land animals known as tetrapods."
ah yes, the good old 'flood and distract' method. classic whob. keep posting nonesense till we hit page 2 and maybe not everyone will notice that you got put in your place again for not reading the source.
Originally posted by Soleran
I thought PVS said this wasn't going to be a linear discussion.............
just keep posted here, its already begun. soon the circle will be complete....then again...and again...and again...till page 340
Originally posted by PVS
"In the fishes' forward fins, the scientists found evidence of limbs in the making. There are the beginnings of digits, proto-wrists, elbows and shoulders. The fish also had a flat skull resembling a crocodile's, a neck, ribs and other parts that were similar to four-legged land animals known as tetrapods."
Don't fish that have fin bones resembling hands already exist?
lol..I think so..😆
And guess what..my picture is actually a "real" picture of a fish. Not one that is drawn by an artist...🙄
Originally posted by whobdamandog
And guess what..my picture is actually a "real" picture of a fish. Not one that is drawn by a artist...🙄
yes whob, its all a lie. baby jesus is weeping.
:edit: also, we are talking about evolution. because an animal evolves doesnt mean that its predicessor's traits vanish. thus the reason why we staill have FISH perhaps?
So how did the one in the middle survive?
Did it breather water and air at the same time?
Did it live in water completly, out of water completly, or both?
Did it just sit on the rock there, kind of in-between?
Did it continue to eat sea food, land food, or a mix of both?
Did it mate with creatures from land or from water?
Where were its offspring habitating? In water or on land?
Oh wait, no answers for those questions, becuase nobody knows.
This is a fictitious creature, cobbled together from a warped alligator fossil.
(And they call ME crazy for believing in God.)
😉
Originally posted by PVS
yes whob, its all a lie. baby jesus is weeping.:edit: also, we are talking about evolution. because an animal evolves doesnt mean that its predicessor's traits vanish. thus the reason why we staill have FISH perhaps?
Seriously bud....you all are delusional..this is all you have to base your pictures off of....
lol..and you wonder why I'm laughing...
One doesn't even need to get a degree at Harvard or Yale to figure out the absurdity of this new "missing link" claim..
As soon as I saw the contrived photo I began to laugh and think to myself..this looks exactly like a walking fish!!
What the heck have these guys been smoking!!
How is this an example of the missing link?!!
😆
It was a worthy effort, reminiscent of the old piltdown and java man silliness..but I'm certain others will quickly catch on to the "silliness" to this most recent "evolutionary" discovery. You know how the old saying goes though..
A dying flame flickers violently, before it is about to go out...
With that being stated, unless a numerous amount of "valid" transitionals" are found in the coming years, I believe we'll see an end to this whole "macro evoloutionary" concept within the next decade or so.
Originally posted by PVS
"In the fishes' forward fins, the scientists found evidence of limbs in the making. There are the beginnings of digits, proto-wrists, elbows and shoulders. The fish also had a flat skull resembling a crocodile's, a neck, ribs and other parts that were similar to four-legged land animals known as tetrapods."
Again:
So how did the one in the middle survive?
Did it breather water and air at the same time?
Did it live in water completly, out of water completly, or both?
Did it just sit on the rock there, kind of in-between?
Did it continue to eat sea food, land food, or a mix of both?
Did it mate with creatures from land or from water?
Where were its offspring habitating? In water or on land?
Oh wait, no answers for those questions, becuase nobody knows.
This is a fictitious creature, cobbled together from a warped alligator fossil.
(And they call ME crazy for believing in God.)
😉
by Whob:
"With that being stated, unless a numerous amount of "valid" transitionals" are found in the coming years, I believe we'll see an end to this whole "macro evoloutionary" concept within the next decade or so."
Indeed, micro-biology is proving evolution to be a statistical impossiblity.
Read Darwin's Black Box, a bestseller recently released.
i base my perception off of the research and testimonials of neil h shubin, university of chicago and the scientists which have reported him and his team's findings. you base it off of a low-res picture you found on the same article. i read, you look at pictures...so is it really safe for you to insult my intelligence? and its not a secretive study. all sceptical scientists are welcome to view their findings and scrutinise...yes not a blessed word from them as of yet.
but you and your bible thumping friend above can just stick shit in your ears and eyes, in a desperate attempt to avoid acknowledging what is being found. its worked for your type for so long, hasnt it? ignorance is truly bliss i see
Originally posted by sithsaber408
So how did the one in the middle survive?Did it breather water and air at the same time?
Did it live in water completly, out of water completly, or both?
Did it just sit on the rock there, kind of in-between?
Did it continue to eat sea food, land food, or a mix of both?
Did it mate with creatures from land or from water?
Where were its offspring habitating? In water or on land?
Oh wait, no answers for those questions, becuase nobody knows.
This is a fictitious creature, cobbled together from a warped alligator fossil.
(And they call ME crazy for believing in God.)
😉
Hey Sith..
Check out my most recent thread..
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/f11/t400020.html
It's probably a species of walking fish..not very hard to deduce. Similar fish exist already today. No big discovery here people..move along..
breathing air and water...you mean like....
an amphibian?. I'm not even gonna bother to point out how much the skull of this fish resembles icthyostega, eryops and other large permain amphibians.
But wait, fossils were put in the earth by satan and radio carbon dating is just something made up by "darwinists" who are under the control of the communist gay agenda who themselves are pawns of the secret cabal of zionist muslim freemasons who want to rule the world and worship satan.
Originally posted by PVS
i base my perception off of the research and testimonials of neil h shubin, university of chicago and the scientists which have reported him and his team's findings. you base it off of a low-res picture you found on the same article. i read, you look at pictures...so is it really safe for you to insult my intelligence? and its not a secretive study. all sceptical scientists are welcome to view their findings and scrutinise...yes not a blessed word from them as of yet.but you and your bible thumping friend above can just stick shit in your ears and eyes, in a desperate attempt to avoid acknowledging what is being found. its worked for your type for so long, hasnt it? ignorance is truly bliss i see
I don't think many of the scientist's are attempting to lie PVS, I just think that many of them are very dogmatic in their faith, and choose to disregard common sensical evidence in order to validate what they believe in. Based on the pictures that I've posted of similar species of fish, why is it so hard to believe that this new "discovery" is that much different than the current walking fish that currently reside in Asia today?
I've given you a picture of a spotted hand fish, which has fins that would be clearly more evolved than the one's scientist's are alluding that this particular extinct specimen had.
In addition to this, I've also given you actual photographs of many other species of fish that are able to breathe out of water, and have similarly developed fins/gills. You've given me fictional pictures, and an incomplete skeleton. Seriously Bud, which one of us seems to have the more favorable evidence?
Always get a good laugh when bible bashers try to discredit evolution. Heres an idea, go back and read the article instead of staring at the picture and using you're on bias views to judge. Hey whob, you think the earth is 60,000 years old? And tell me, wouldn't there have to be a lot of inter breeding for the human race to to thrive from just two people? Didn't think God allowed incest relationships. 😉