Originally posted by darthgoober
You mean the arc that you criticize because of WW's performance against Supes?
Diana did well, but even she knew that she would only be able to stall his progress for a little while before he killed her. That's why she killed Max.
And this still doesn't take anything away from my point. You're deviating away from the topic again.
Originally posted by Soljer
I wasn't claiming Batman's win based off of durability - I was just disputing Karnak's 'insurmountable advantage' in that arena.I was claiming that Batman wins because he has speed that's easily on par with the person who has trashed Karnak on multiple occasions, and has skill that surpasses either of them.
Trashed Karnak?
He dodged a mind controlled karnak's attack. The other fight could easily be PIS when it's the ONLY fight that contradicts Karnak's history of feats and abilities. One low feat does not outweigh a mass of high ones, quite the contrary. If that was the case, then Batman would already have lost.
I think the problem is with this entire fight is the evidence in question (BP vs Karnak) used to support the fight in question (Batman vs Karnak) is irrelevent, for the simple reason that, people dont know what panther is capable of...........
People say batman is on par with panther in speed, and um, no, no hes not.......
Originally posted by Apolloknight
I think the problem is with this entire fight is the evidence in question (BP vs Karnak) used to support the fight in question (Batman vs Karnak) is irrelevent, for the simple reason that, people dont know what panther is capable of...........People say batman is on par with panther in speed, and um, no, no hes not.......
Agreed.
He's easily Panther's superior.