Palpatine: Most powerful Sith Lord in History

Started by 666.116 pages

If it wasn't obvious, I was joking. Though the list is the most logical one that you could come up with.

lol because logic says Ludo Kreesh is stronger than Sidious
idiot

but maybe you're right
Palpatine sure as hell couldn't take those Anceint Sith bricks

An unnamed Ancient Sith during the time of Sadow's short rule (where Sadow and Kressh were declared the two most powerful; it's why they were the two who challenged for the title of DLotS) was able to destroy the life of an entire planet (Ambria) with one force attack. That alone is a display of power far beyond that of Palpatine, and Kressh is definitely her superior. Now quit being so uncivil.

give me proof
where is that stated ?

TOTJ sourcebook and Rule of two.

Problem: It was after Sadow's rule actually. Life on Ambria...and it wasn't an intentional attack by any means

TotJ Companion, under the section on Ambria, as well as in PoD.

Not to mention for all you know it was ritualistic. Give it up Noobaris. You've yet to win a debate in your 30+ bans and Palpatine is still #1.

Nebaris, you're an idiot whose idea of a list of most powerful Sith put nearly all of them above Palpatine. I have only one message for you:

STOP TRYING!

Just stop coming back to KMC after you've been banned. Nobody cares about your ridiculously mistaken opinions. So stop trying!

Neb, seriously, just give up. TYhe current tally is reality- 30, nebaris' fantasy- 0. You're just making yourself look more pathetic.

Hey nebaris as intelligent as you honestly are, just give it up, it is not as amusing as it used to be.

If your really out there to annoy people, it isn't working here anymore. But honestly? You can irritate the morons are lucasforums.com at the Kotor section.

Go tool them with your pro bane argument, its not like they understand the term canon nor do they know how to debate properly.

Originally posted by Lightsnake
TOTJ sourcebook and Rule of two.

Wasn't it PoD?

Problem: It was after Sadow's rule actually.

My bad on not actually being clear there; what I meant to say was that she was a member of the Ancient Sith during its final days, under Sadow's rule (where Sadow and Kressh were stated by the omniscient narrator to be the two most powerful).

She killed the life of the planet centuries afterwards, but irregardless of that, the point was: she was definitely their inferior.

For those who don't know, she had also used her powers to singlehandedly enslave the entire planet.

Life on Ambria...and it wasn't an intentional attack by any means

Why don't you think it was intentional? All that's stated is that she unleashed a wave of power that destroyed all of the life on the planet. It's been a while since I read the passage, but the message I always got was that she did so in a fit of rage or something. Nothing points to the attack being unintentional.

Originally posted by Darth Sexy
Not to mention for all you know it was ritualistic.

No. It's explicitly stated that she had just been attempting a ritual before so (for those who don't know, it was an extremely complex one that was stated to draw more power from the darkside than ever before), that it failed, and that she then unleashed a wave of power. It was in no way a ritualistic application of the Force.

No, she failed at the ritual which was the result of the wave of power. It was still a failed ritual and not a way of force power. It's up to you to prove it was her personal power.