The Scientific Theory of Intelligent Design

Started by debbiejo51 pages

I miss Teh Smart guy........... 🤨

agreed, ID doesn't really have anything against evolution, that's just a misunderstanding.

Originally posted by debbiejo
I miss Teh Smart guy........... 🤨
well, whob was teh smart guy, and teh smart guy was gay, so...

Originally posted by lord xyz
agreed, ID doesn't really have anything against evolution, that's just a misunderstanding.

Well yeah there both theroies that try to explain the origin of life. it's just that ID rely's on a designer and proving there is a designer is well very difficult because we don't know what it is.

Originally posted by Ushgarak
No. In fact, they can't possibly be. ID is a philisophical position on how evolution came about.

It contradicts what most scientists would think in that area, but it does not contradict Evolution itself. It wouldn't actually exist without it.

Again, the reason to exclude it from Science class isn't because it is definitely gibberish, but because there is absolutely no reason to think it is true. It is based entirely on a non-scientific opinion about what is and is not 'randomly' possible. It doesn't have any part to play in the scientific process. Such faith-based ideas belong in faith-based classes.

agreed. i'm not sure it necessarily conradicts what scientists think though, at least not as much as it tries to fill in the blanks left behind by science and its theories. science breaks down at a certain level. taking what scientists speculate as truth is faith of another form. some will say that the idea of m-theory and 11 dimensions to the universe, or the fact that our universe is really only the daughter of a previously existing universe and merely continuing a cycle that has gone on forever, is as crazy as believing in an intelligence behind its creation.

of course, ID can't be proven and so cannot be called 'scientific' and i believe it should NOT be taught in a scientific sense. but it is interesting, and is at least worthy of intelligent discussion.

STILL no proof of ID???
Oh... well...

Originally posted by The Omega
STILL no proof of ID???
Oh... well...

I'm not debating anymore 😕

And whob is banned, think its time to close thread lol.

Originally posted by lord xyz
well, whob was teh smart guy, and teh smart guy was gay, so...
I know,.... 😱 .....but it made my life more interesting that day....

Originally posted by Magee
And whob is banned, think its time to close thread lol.

crybaby

Why do people call it Intelligent design and not Stupid design? Because there is the assumption that it is Intelligent.

Does it really matter? Isn't the more important thing rather what we as humans can do to live better, more compassionate, peaceful lives, regardless of what the 'Universe' is?

You cannot wrap something as big as the Universe into a theory anyway, and if we do it's not like the universe is gonna notice our interpretations.

Originally posted by Blue nocturne
Well yeah there both theroies that try to explain the origin of life. it's just that ID rely's on a designer and proving there is a designer is well very difficult because we don't know what it is.
genes are designers Blue 🙄 and you should know the variaty and mutation evidence by now.

There is no god.

Everything is random. Luckily the universe won the one in a trillion chance of coming to life.

There is a God.
What the hell else keeps this thread going??

Originally posted by lord xyz
well, whob was teh smart guy, and teh smart guy was gay, so...

He really f***ed himself.

Thank you very much, I'll be here all week. 😐

Originally posted by Mindship
There is a God.

And your proof of that is where?

In the Religion forum.

Originally posted by Aziz!
And your proof of that is where?

As I mentioned, what else could be keeping this thread going? (so much for my attempt at humor bag ).

😂 Yeah, mindship, I really doubt your cynical observation about this thread's longevity should be mistaken for your outright, single expression on ideology.

Originally posted by lord xyz
genes are designers Blue 🙄 and you should know the variaty and mutation evidence by now.

I guess...