where do dinosaurs and cavemen fit into the bible, or does it?

Started by Alliance14 pages

The only thing you have done is but together a collection of snakes and said that they're all dragons.

You have no case.

I saw this thing on Dragons on the History Channel.....
There were 2 theories for Dragons appearing everywhere
1.)Back when we were Monkey Like creatures(yes that's against your religion despite being proven 😬) there were 3 main predators, Snakes, Birds, and Cats, which is basically the look of a Dragon, it was built-in genetics to run from those, and t know the Predators, eventually the images combined, and you now have a Dragon

2.)Ancients found bones of Dinosaurs, like Pterodactyl, and knew nothing like them, so they made images of what they may have looked like

Originally posted by Alliance
The only thing you have done is but together a collection of snakes and said that they're all dragons.

You have no case.

I say nah; because what is the purpose of naming an animal something if it already had a name? Why call an elephant in English anything else besides an elephant?

Ummm...what?

Originally posted by Darth Kreiger
Ummm...what?
Originally posted by Darth Kreiger
Ummm...what?

What do you call a snake?

A snake....it's differant in each language, what are you getting at?

Originally posted by Darth Kreiger
A snake....it's differant in each language, what are you getting at?

Why make a new name for something that has already been given a name?

Because people developed in differant areas of the world....

and they have different languages. Words can change menaing too.

Originally posted by Darth Kreiger
Because people developed in differant areas of the world....

Germany: lindworm

Germany has a different word for snake: Schlange

What is the puprose of lindworm if they already had a name for snake? If it was a snake why not call it Schlange?

Whats the difference between a dog and and Daschund?

Originally posted by Alliance
Whats the difference between a dog and and Daschund?

A daschund is a type of dog. A dog is the species in general.

Since I'm too lazy to read the past 4 pages, what are you getting at ESB, if anything at all?

Originally posted by Darth Kreiger
Since I'm too lazy to read the past 4 pages, what are you getting at ESB, if anything at all?

You call an elephant an elephant. You call a dog a dog. You call a snake a snake. What would be the point for Germany calling a schlange a lindworm? There would be none unless lindworm was something else.

Originally posted by ESB -1138
A daschund is a type of dog. A dog is the species in general.

Yes, exactly. except dog is the common name for the species.

People can have moe than one name for the same thing.

Again, ESB-1138, what is the point your trying to make?

Originally posted by Alliance
Yes, exactly. except dog is the common name for the species.

People can have moe than one name for the same thing.

Did the two names come from the same area?

Originally posted by Darth Kreiger
Again, ESB-1138, what is the point your trying to make?

Lindworm is not a schlange (snake) and thus cannot be of the same species. All the cultures I pointed before has a different word for snake and a word for their great beast.

Ugh, ESB-1138, why are you sating this since there seems to be no point to what your saying, does it have to do with proving God?

Originally posted by Darth Kreiger
Ugh, ESB-1138, why are you sating this since there seems to be no point to what your saying, does it have to do with proving God?

You say their is no point but their is a point. Almost every culture has shown a type of dragon (dinosaur) through their works. You refuse the Bible because you say it is false but the Bible mentioned dinosaurs. It has mentioned that the universe is ever expanding. It has mentioned gravity before the laws were made.