Sound like he will be backup QB and I imagine they will work in some wildcat type of plays for him eventually.
He was suspended indefinitely a long time ago. Goodell has since conditionally reinstated Vick. He is allowed to play in the final 2 pre season games and attend any and all team functions except for actual games. Goodell will reconsider Vick for a full reinstatement no later than week 6. So really Vick could play in week 1 or week 7. Or I guess when Goodell re-evaluates it he could say your out the entire season but I assuming Vick doesnt do something stupid I am sure that wont happen.
Originally posted by Smasandian
He should play week 1.He did his time. He got suspended indefinitely. One thing I like about hockey is when you get suspended, you come back after the suspension. None of this suspended until I say you are not.
Except Vick is a piece of sh*t and deserves it. I can't stand the guy, and I hope he goes through hell in Philly with all the pissed off fans here. He'll be used in the Wildcat a lot I assume, and also as a backup QB. Wouldn't be suprised to see Vick and McNabb on the field at the same time for some trick plays a little more often then you might think. I think he can do some good things for the Eagles, but can potentially cause a disaster. People here a dumbasses and don't like McNabb and always want to get rid of him. So, come week 7 if the Eagles and/or McNabb is struggling they will be screaming for Vick at QB, which is a thought I don't want. I personally think he sucks at QB besides his running obviously, and he is probably much worse now since he's been in jail for 2 years.
I've always liked the Vikings and Eagles both the same amount. Never like one team more than the other, until the Eagles signed Vick. I now like the Vikings slightly more than the Eagles and will root for the Vikes if they ever meet in the playoffs again. Vick better preform though. I would hate to have that scumbag on my team, and then have him suck too.
Yeah, he could potentially be alot worst than TO with the thousand of protesters you will have.
And you know people will be calling for Vick for QB by week 2.
I hate people who chant, "We want so or so". Sometimes its deserved, but mostly it's not. I remember people were chanting, "We want Henson, we want Henson". Guess how that worked?
For one year, or two?
One year, that's retarded. He won't be worth that much money.
I was reading Glazer's report on it stating that Booty is outplaying Jackson and Rosenfels. It's come to my attention that the most overused sentence in offseason football is " Player A is being outplayed by 3 stringer in training camp".
How many times does the actual be true? Why is somebody outplaying another person but is still not a starter when season comes around?
Originally posted by Smasandian
Anything can happen. It's not that far fetched.
well the colts lost Harrison & have been having coaching problems lately
the cowboys... they can't even make it past the playoffs bad enough they lost their best receiver so now we're gonna see who the problem really was with that team.
Harrison has been gone for years. He isn't going to be problem. They'll be fine. The main strength when they won the SB wasn't Wayne or Harrison, it was there running game. Brown should make that better.
Look at Arizona. They made it to the Superbowl and they could barely make it out past .500. I'm not saying the Cowboys will be in the SB, but it can happen. They still have a good team.
Losing TO wont make that much of a difference. You don't need him to do it. Roy Williams can be just as effective as TO was and without him, they are still have a ton of offensive weapons. Witten, Barber, Williams, Felix Jones can still do it. You can win without top end WR's.