Originally posted by BackFire
Flawless = Perfection. As per the definitions of the words. Something can't be flawless but imperfect.If not flaws, what keeps Mario 64 from perfection for you? Just curious, is all.
Just because something is 'perfect' does not mean everyone will like it, though. That's...fairly common sense. Ultimately personal tastes mean more as to how people think of things than how perfect it is (or isn't).
And it doesn't really matter that much if a game is flawless or not, anyway. FFX is a flawed game, for sure. I admit that. However, as far as I am concerned? That game IS perfect. Mario 64 may be near-flawless but it ain't perfect.
I just don't really think it's pure fun, as you said it was. It IS fun, but I have played a lot of games which I had a lot more fun with. I guess it's mostly the whole having to go through each level over half a dozen times to collect all the stars that ultimately shoved the game from the "pure fun" category for me. I wouldn't so much as say that's a flaw, though, but more me having an attention span that can't deal with that sort of repetition without wanting to play something else. When I was a kid and only had a few games to play, it didn't bother me, and I liked how it really added to the longevity of the game without making it really hard. Now, though, it just annoys me.
Originally posted by Ushgarak
It can be flawless within the parameters of its design but not the perfect game, the allegory of which that you can have several flawless diamonds, but it is much harder to find 'the' perfect one.Example- Tetris.
Tetris is awesome.