Vong Slayer Vs Marka Ragnos

Started by Lightsnake24 pages

New Essential Chronology, Revan is declared a DLOTS

Ok... And in KOTOR he was just a Sith Lord? And in KOTOR he was referred to as just a sith lord? UNless of course the NEC calls him and Malak DLOTS, which is proposterous.

Malak took the title from him. In KOTOR, he leads the Sith, he is the DLOTS

Get it through your head, neither were DLOTS, they were mentioned as Sith Lords, nobody crowned them.. What do you think happened, they just went to the outer rim and crowned themselves? Give me a break.. NEC also says Palpatine was the most powerful sith ever too.. And we've disproved your NEC logic many times.

Originally posted by tdtd
Ok... And in KOTOR he was just a Sith Lord? And in KOTOR he was referred to as just a sith lord? UNless of course the NEC calls him and Malak DLOTS, which is proposterous.

He is mentioned more than once as the DLOTS in KOTOR... get those earplugs out of your ears.

Oh wait I forgot you put them there to keep that excuse of a brain from falling out.

"What if we train him and THE DARK LORD SHOULD RETURN."
And the NEC>Your opinion, pal. On this matter especially

Says the one who thinks Malak is a DLOTS... But you're right, you have admitted you have very little to no knowledge of Star Wars.. Way to prove it.

Ok...Malak was a Dark sider and a lord? Right? What was he lord OF? The foirces that bore the name 'Sith'

Righty-oh

Originally posted by Lightsnake
"What if we train him and THE DARK LORD SHOULD RETURN."
And the NEC>Your opinion, pal. On this matter especially

And again, NEC contradicts a lot of things like Palpatine being the strongest of the strongest, stop calling it "canon" all of a sudden because you think it will improve your argument.

Originally posted by Lightsnake
Ok...Malak was a Dark sider and a lord? Right? What was he lord OF? The foirces that bore the name 'Sith'

I forgot some of you can't comprehend the difference between a Sith Lord, and a DLOTS.. You don't just crown yourself the DLOTS, especially not in the pre-Ruusan days.. Sorry Lightsnake.
Righty-oh

Right, because any other Sith is ever declared the strongest of all time. Sorry, but according to the author and LFL, there's nos uch definitive statement like that preceeding the NEC and I'm taking what they say over you any day

Ludo Kressh was a self proclaimed DLOTS, try again

UH, you forgot the fact that the title was stripped from Sadow and Ludo was the next in line..

Originally posted by Lightsnake
Right, because any other Sith is ever declared the strongest of all time. Sorry, but according to the author and LFL, there's nos uch definitive statement like that preceeding the NEC and I'm taking what they say over you any day

The concept of DLOTS died with Exar Kun and was reborn into a new form by the New Sith..Between the death of Exar Kun and the New Sith, there were no real DLOTS...

Oooh, really now? Tell that to Revan who revived the Sith teachings and the empire persisting between them...and to quote: "At least one Sith lord survived to carry on the name of 'Darth'

And who decides what is "real" ?

In the fictional Star Wars universe, Darth precedes the title of a Sith Lord.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darth

Way to pwn yourself lightsnake.

Originally posted by Razielim
And who decides what is "real" ?

The ancient sith, a council, Iunno? Exar Kun was the last of the real DLOTS. Self Proclaimed DLOTS apparently came around during the new sith empire..

Not anymore. Hm, read the article you posted: Darth Andeddu was apparently an ancient....WITH THE NAME DARTH! WOW!

what gave those dark lords the right to declare a DL? The Dark Side guided the new Sith