Originally posted by Lightsnake
Prove it. Want a quote.And 'facts' are proveable and undeniable. You've yet to show me something definite from Star Wars when you haven't even READ the series involving one of the combatanants
Show you what lightsnake, it is pure fact that YOU are the only one on this forum that argues against facts, real quotes, etc.. So what would I get out of showing you anything? I don't even like arguing with you because you argue against facts...
Originally posted by Lightsnake
Td, I'm going to lay it on the line:
Unless you have a quote saying "Sadow was the most powerful Force user ever besides Marka and maybe Simus," Shut up.
LOL!!!! That's some infallible logic lightsnake, I'm not even going to bother with you anymore, I'll leave it to Janus or someone who has more patience for your stupidity.
What real quotes? You brought out 'tremendous?' I brought out a counterexample. I see you don't have any quote to back up almost ANYTHING you say. Prove Naga was even the second or third strongest of the ancient empire, prove Simus was once DLotS, go on, I'm waiting.
And what's more, you haven't even READ NJO or DN, you're more legless in this debate than Anakin on Mustafar.
tdtd, quotes alone are not enough to make fact or act as proof as they are repeatedly contradicted and it is hard to judge the accuracy and credibility of them. And quotes are all that you are using td so until you can add more to the table, stop acting as if you are winning this debate because you ARE losing.
Originally posted by Lightsnake
What real quotes? You brought out 'tremendous?' I brought out a counterexample. I see you don't have any quote to back up almost ANYTHING you say. Prove Naga was even the second or third strongest of the ancient empire, prove Simus was once DLotS, go on, I'm waiting.And what's more, you haven't even READ NJO or DN, you're more legless in this debate than Anakin on Mustafar.
Wrong.. Ancient Sith>All=fact. You're asking for stupid quotes that won't prove anything. That's like me asking "Provide me a quote that says Sidious can take down Ragnos". Notice the stupidity in that logic? This is why you can't win a debate, this is why debating with you is a waste of time. I don't have to provide you a quote as to why Naga Sadow is the second or third greatest Sith.. It's called Deductive Reasoning. Learn it and use it.. Thanks.
Originally posted by BLAK FOX
tdtd, quotes alone are not enough to make fact or act as proof as they are repeatedly contradicted and it is hard to judge the accuracy and credibility of them. And quotes are all that you are using td so until you can add more to the table, stop acting as if you are winning this debate because you ARE losing.
Good thing you and Lightsnake aren't credible sources on this forum. You can't convince the ignorant of facts, so now I can sit back and let others skull**** you..
Originally posted by Lightsnake
No, if it was that, I'd be providing evidence. You're declaring statements with ZERO fact, give me a damn quote expressly saying Ancient Sith>AllI'm waiting.
I suppose you don't understand the concept of the Golden Age of the Sith, where the most powerful existed, and the most sith magic/alchemy was practiced, and the fact that most of the force powers you see in all of these books originated from the ancient sith. Let me guess, "give me a quote that says that these powers came from the ancient sith". Please lightsnake..
Gee, a Golden Age of their empire, when Ragnos later tasked Kun with creating a new Golden Age, compared to the tHOUSAND YEARS OF SITH DOMINANCE over the entire galaxy which sort of surpasses the grandeur of the Ancient Empire, especially when it's quoted saying the New Sith Empire was larger and greater than the old.
Originally posted by Lightsnake
Gee, a Golden Age of their empire, when Ragnos later tasked Kun with creating a new Golden Age, compared to the tHOUSAND YEARS OF SITH DOMINANCE over the entire galaxy which sort of surpasses the grandeur of the Ancient Empire, especially when it's quoted saying the New Sith Empire was larger and greater than the old.
And where was this said? Especially since the NEW SITH EMPIRE was an idea, nothing more. There was no physical sith empire on Korriban or any of that nonsense, so stop making shit up. I don't see why you would make up ridiculous quotes like that, except to weaken your argument. And you STILL fail to see that Ragnos was THE Dark Lord... Perhaps you don't understand the concept. And Kun was tasked with it, goodie, he didn't accomplish it. You have effectively made up shit to weaken your argument, proved nothing, and disproved nothing, way to go Lightsnake, it's been a pleasure.
Ah, now who's arguing with the facts?
And a massive empire of worlds, militant soldiers trained in the magic of Sith, crushing the Jedi is....an idea? Right.
And yeah, there was no actual empire on Korriban, just on the entire galaxy except the core worlds. Darth Ruin's new order? Kaan? Bane?
Ragnos was THE dark Lord, that's fascinating...Sadow was THE Dark Lord, Sidious was THE Dark Lord, Bane was THE Dark Lord. You've still proven nothing
Originally posted by Lightsnake
Ah, now who's arguing with the facts?And a massive empire of worlds, militant soldiers trained in the magic of Sith, crushing the Jedi is....an idea? Right.
And yeah, there was no actual empire on Korriban, just on the entire galaxy except the core worlds. Darth Ruin's new order? Kaan? Bane?
Ragnos was THE dark Lord, that's fascinating...Sadow was THE Dark Lord, Sidious was THE Dark Lord, Bane was THE Dark Lord. You've still proven nothing
You're an idiot. THE Dark lord.. That means the Dark Lord of all Dark Lords... Everyone was a DLOTS while Ragnos was THE Dark Lord. He had the last say about Kun, about Nadd, and about Sidious.. You're way too easy lightsnake, but I don't have time to sit on this forum 24/7 and argue with you.... Enjoy your Sunday on KMC.