captain america and logan have already proven they can take down beast when they want to...
but considering that beast underwent second mutations since they're fight that might change... but then again so did spidey....
I'd say concerning classic versions spidey and cap would take this...
most current versions.. I don't know.
Originally posted by KharmaDog
Why do people overestimate wolverine?
they don't... 😕
if you actually paid attention to half the threads concerning wolverine that take place here.. over 75% of the material is wolverine fans trying to convince people who don't read wolverine books that wolverine can even do the things he's done.. overestimation is not a factor on these boards where logan is concerned.
Originally posted by jinzin
they don't... 😕if you actually paid attention to half the threads concerning wolverine that take place here.. over 75% of the material is wolverine fans trying to convince people who don't read wolverine books that wolverine can even do the things he's done.. overestimation is not a factor on these boards where logan is concerned.
Originally posted by badabing
I don't think it's that people don't believe that the events happened, I think people are tired of Wolverine doing things he shouldn't be able to accomplish. This is only my opinion.
but what would they be basing those perceptions of wolverine on.. it's already pretty well established that most of the people who refuse to allow the possibility for wolverine doing the things he's done don't generally read that many wolverine comics... forcing us (his fans) to have to go over the same fundemental points about his character over and over again...
wolverine is superhuman in all categories and yet people refer to his capabilities as peak human all the time...
again.. IMO...
When someone argues that they have seen evidence of something but that the evidence doesn't count because that character "shouldn't be able to do that" they need to re-think the premise of thier conclusion. A characters abilities are based on what he or she demonstrates he or she can do, not on what someone thought they could do at one time.
Originally posted by jinzin
but what would they be basing those perceptions of wolverine on.. it's already pretty well established that most of the people who refuse to allow the possibility for wolverine doing the things he's done don't generally read that many wolverine comics... forcing us (his fans) to have to go over the same fundemental points about his character over and over again...wolverine is superhuman in all categories and yet people refer to his capabilities as peak human all the time...
again.. IMO...
When someone argues that they have seen evidence of something but that the evidence doesn't count because that character "shouldn't be able to do that" they need to re-think the premise of thier conclusion. A characters abilities are based on what he or she demonstrates he or she can do, not on what someone thought they could do at one time.
see this is a hard one. beast in my oppion is would would drag wolverine team down if this was straight up beast vs capt or what not, but see this is a team battle and beast and logan have far more experience working to gather and would be far more effective team. so I think logan and beast might take this.