Originally posted by BackFire
Why is it pointless, people think it's a missile and their only "evidence" is that it isn't proven that it's a plane and that the government is witholding videos.If the missile theory wasn't crap to begin with I wouldn't make it out to be as stupid as David Ike theories.
It is not pointless. However, please explain where flight 77 went. Because in the video provideded, it wasn't into the pentagon. Because the evidence provided, in tape form, is not a 757 hitting the side of that building.
Originally posted by Capt_Fantastic
It is not pointless. However, please explain where flight 77 went. Because in the video provideded, it wasn't into the pentagon. Because the evidence provided, in tape form, is not a 757 hitting the side of that building.
its was abducted by ufo's and taken to the orion nebula where it is being disected and studied by little green men under the guidance of david icke.
(just figured i would throw out the typical nonsensical response and beat the parrots to it)
Originally posted by PVS
its was abducted by ufo's and taken to the orion nebula where it is being disected and studied by little green men under the guidance of david icke.(just figured i would throw out the typical nonsensical response and beat the parrots to it)
You do that a lot lately....I tell you, it is a thin line, you don't want to cross too often.
Originally posted by Capt_Fantastic
It is not pointless. However, please explain where flight 77 went. Because in the video provideded, it wasn't into the pentagon. Because the evidence provided, in tape form, is not a 757 hitting the side of that building.
Lie.
ONLY in your opinion does show it is NOT a 757.
In the opinion of all reasonable people, it simply cannot be told what the object is.
The video might be useless, but it sure as hell neither:
1. Disproves it was a plane
2. Proves it was a missile
With all the other supporting evidence, it is still very silly to think anything other than it was a plane.
Originally posted by Ushgarak
Lie.ONLY in your opinion does show it is NOT a 757.
In the opinion of all reasonable people, it simply cannot be told what the object is.
The video might be useless, but it sure as hell neither:
1. Disprove it was a plane
2. Prove it was a missile
With all the other supporting evidence, it is still very silly to think anything other than it was a plane.
Let's add a point 3 and 4 though:
Doesn't....
3. Disproves it was a missile
4. Proves it was a plane
Originally posted by PVS
btw, why is it that, judging by this thread, scepticism seems to be viewed as the ultimate sin. for the life of me i dont know why.
some people are fine with just going with the flow and dont wanna interupt the stats quo?
good walt witman poem:
This is what you should do: love the earth and sun and the animals, despise riches, give alms to every that asks, stand up for the stupid and crazy, devote your income and labor to others, hate tyrans, argue not concerning god, have patience and indulgence toward the people, take off your hate to nothing known or unknown or to any man or number of men . . . re-examine all you have been toldat school or church or in any book, dismiss what insults your own soul, and your very flesh shall be a great poem.
(I added some bold in but even Walt, had emphasized the re-examine... part)
Point is theres nothing wrong with questioning what you are told, especially from the government.
Originally posted by Ya Krunk'd Floo
Maybe I'm being rather simplistic here, but if it was a plane, don't you think you'd be able to see it?
exactly. That's all there is to it. And this has been my point from the beginning. Taking into consideration all the objects in view, the side of the building and the size of a 757, it is clearly not an airplane.
As ever, that's simple nonsense. The answer to Ya's question is simple- travelling at that speed, no, you might not. The camera didn't have enough frames per second. A single missed frame could- and did- see the plane travel through the shot and into the buidling.
There is not the remotest basis to say it is not an aeroplane. The image is not clear enough to reveal anything at all.
Bardock- your points 3 and 4 are totally worthless. All the other evidence points to it being a plane. Hence, the idea that it is not a plane and IS a missle needs to be properly established. Basic burden of proof. Try and keep up with what is being discussed here.
PVS- the sin being seen here is not scepticsim. Based on what we have before is, what has been demonstrated is actually just idiocy.
Originally posted by Ushgarak
Read the thread. Do that courtesy. This has been discussed a heck of a lot in here already. It is polite to read the thread first.
Yeah, but you just didn't produce anything that makes me believe it was a Plane. Now I am not saying t wasn't a plane, but just being sure it was is...stupid.