9/11 Flight 77 (Pentagon) Footage Released

Started by PVS16 pages

Originally posted by Ushgarak
No no, I am saying you would have to be braindead to look at all the substantial stuff I have posted and call it less than what you have said. Now, if you want to fit the shoe, that;s your business, but I stand by what I say there absolutely.

If I don't like what you say, it's not because you don't agree with me, but because of your apparently dimwitted refusal to accept facts in favour of your sensationalist piece of fiction.

so someone would have to be braindead to not agree with you.
so if capt doesnt agree with you its his own fault.
pointless left handed insults ROCK 🤘

If I use google to find related information, or wikipedia, will I be chastised and strung up?

Anyone?

Originally posted by Ushgarak
You are either simply stupid or just folling yourself. You have not the slightest beginning of grounds to back that, and when something is pointed out to the contrary, you simply ignore it.

And this is the third time your stunning moderator qualities have shown themselves. Again, you resort to insulting because I disagree. That is not needed.

And you seem to think that because I "imagine" the damage consistant with a missle vs. a plane, that you AREN'T "imagining" the damage of a plane vs a missle. You don't know any more about it than I do.

Ushgarak you have no more evidence to say it was a plane than the conspiracy theorists have to say it was a missile. This debate will still be getting discussed in 50 years time.

Originally posted by NineCoronas
Anyone?

meh...who cares. i doubt dick cheney is reading any of this.

Originally posted by Capt_Fantastic
Yeah, I know a lot about cruise missles. But I know a jumbo jet travelling as fast as one, loaded with aviation fuel, would do a hell of a lot more damage to that building than occured on that day.

Do you? HOW do you know this?

It penetrated three rings of one of tbe most armoured buildings oin the country. It damaged all five rings. It blew apart the parts it hit with such force that the entire saide of the building eventually collapsed.

So, Mr. Plane Collision expert, tell us why you know that a 757 (stop calling it a jumbo) would have done more than that?

Originally posted by amity75
Ushgarak you have no more evidence to say it was a plane than the conspiracy theorists have to say it was a missile. This debate will still be getting discussed in 50 years time.

Lying won't help you. Read the thread again, and you will see the evidence.

I don't lie.

Originally posted by amity75
Ushgarak you have no more evidence to say it was a plane than the conspiracy theorists have to say it was a missile. This debate will still be getting discussed in 50 years time.
\

unless of coarse the footage is released and the everyone can just...know. but for some reason which i would be retarded in questioning, that is not going to happen. oh well

Originally posted by PVS
here's a bigger challenge: where did i say i had evidence that it was a missle or even declaired it to be anything beyond speculation?

ok, ill start my homework and you start yours.

*DONE* 😱

PVS all you have done in this thread is LIE! Here is what you said earlier:

Originally posted by PVS
i think it was a cruise missile.
[b]thats all im going to say
since i debated it to death and
i fear i already baited deano as it is. [/B]

After 6 pages you're still here....and you answer a question with another question. I love people who just do that.....

Originally posted by Capt_Fantastic
And this is the third time your stunning moderator qualities have shown themselves. Again, you resort to insulting because I disagree. That is not needed.

And you seem to think that because I "imagine" the damage consistant with a missle vs. a plane, that you AREN'T "imagining" the damage of a plane vs a missle. You don't know any more about it than I do.

I can understand coherent analysis by experts when I see it. And I find their explanations a thosand times more accurate than yours.

Trying to make out I am a mod does not make you any less foolish for bliding yourself to facts, you know. You post foolish arguments, I will happily point them out all day long.

Originally posted by Ushgarak
Lying won't help you. Read the thread again, and you will see the evidence.

There was a girl that once posted something similar to this in the OTF. I believe it was in regards to how she wanted her boyfriend to get cricumsized.

Her posts went somewhat like this:

"If you look back in the thread, you see I am right. 😉 😉 😉 😉 😉"

Originally posted by PVS
so someone would have to be braindead to not agree with you.
so if capt doesnt agree with you its his own fault.
pointless left handed insults ROCK 🤘

To not agree with the evidence. I'm just the messenger.

Originally posted by Ushgarak
your apparently dimwitted

number 4. You seem to be all shades of bothered by me today Ush. And if the shoe fits, it's only because you say so? I don't think that's how it works.

Originally posted by amity75
I don't lie.

When you say there has been no evidence that it was a plane, you are either incapable of understanding the thread, or lying. Choose.

Originally posted by WrathfulDwarf
PVS all you have done in this thread is LIE! Here is what you said earlier:

ZOMG LIES LIES LIES!!!!!!!!!!!!!111111111

Originally posted by WrathfulDwarf
After 6 pages you're still here....and you answer a question with another question. I love people who just do that.....

i cant help it...i was baited. the same as you, who claims that this is all so ridiculous and not even worth pondering...yet you seem so....aroused 🙄

The government is evil

This isn't going to end well.

Anyway, I found some information on cruise missiles. Tomahawk missiles carry a 500kg payload of explosives, enough to destroy bunkers or sink ships (Their intended use, I guess).

Originally posted by Ushgarak
When you say there has been no evidence that it was a plane, you are either incapable of understanding the thread, or lying. Choose.
Em no, read my post, I didn't say there was NO evidence, I said that there was no more evidence to distinguish it from a plane crash than from a missile attack.

Originally posted by Ushgarak
I can understand coherent analysis by experts when I see it. And I find their explanations a thosand times more accurate than yours.

Trying to make out I am a mod does not make you any less foolish for bliding yourself to facts, you know. You post foolish arguments, I will happily point them out all day long.

When the experts are the ones telling the story, I would imagine you should.

I'm not a sensationalist or any sort of conspiracy monger. But I know what I see and believe. And you choose to say that all the exprerts support your perspective, while none support mine. And that's fine. You are certainly welcome to go on believeing that video shows an object the size of a 757, and I will go on believeing it does not.

All the insults you toss at me won't change that.