9/11 Flight 77 (Pentagon) Footage Released

Originally posted by Capt_Fantastic
When the experts are the ones telling the story, I would imagine you should.

I'm not a sensationalist or any sort of conspiracy monger. But I know what I see and believe. And you choose to say that all the exprerts support your perspective, while none support mine. And that's fine. You are certainly welcome to go on believeing that video shows an object the size of a 757, and I will go on believeing it does not.

All the insults you toss at me won't change that.

It's been admitted that the video being talked about doesn't show a 757 hitting the Pentagon, this hasn't been denied. But what's foolish is denying/ignoring all the other outside evidence that clearly does show evidence that it was a plane, from the passenger list, to the aircraft debree in another picture, to the aviation fuel burns on the building, to the wing damage, too eyewitness reports.

The only evidence for it being a missile is "this particular video doesn't explicitly show that it's a plane." Got new for you guys, it also doesn't show that it's a missile. So we'd better come up with a third option since this video is obviously the only piece of evidence that matters.

You know, now that I watch the video again and stop it at the point where it shows the front nose of whatever it is going towards the pentagon...it looks a lot like a giant dildo.

There you have it folks, the terrorists flew a dildo into the pentagon.

Originally posted by BackFire

There you have it folks, the terrorists flew a dildo into the pentagon.

how did i just KNOW that you would eventually work sex toys into the topic?

Originally posted by BackFire
It's been admitted that the video being talked about doesn't show a 757 hitting the Pentagon, this hasn't been denied.

It has been denied repeatedly by Ush. If he is going to argue that the video doesn't show a 757, then what is he saying it is? What are you saying it is? And if something else hit the pentagon on 9/11...before th eplane hit, then why was this not part of the official story of that days events? Everyone keeps saying it was something, not a 757, but not a missle either, then what was it that hit the building, clearly, before flight 77? And if we're going to say it wasn't a 757, and it wasn't footage of flight 77, then on what occasion was the pentagon bombed, hit by a dildo or a fat person, that wasn't reported to the people of this country?

Originally posted by PVS
how did i just KNOW that you would eventually work sex toys into the topic?

Originally posted by PVS
ZOMG LIES LIES LIES!!!!!!!!!!!!!111111111

i cant help it...i was baited. the same as you, who claims that this is all so ridiculous and not even worth pondering...yet you seem so....aroused 🙄

Nice...what you taking as bait I see it as a pointless waste of any further time. I appreciate what NineCoronas did by doing some research. I leave you with this:

Popular Mechanics

I'm sure you've seen the magazine in stores shelves. Maybe if you bother to pick one up you'll be amaze. Have a good Day.

Originally posted by Capt_Fantastic
It has been denied repeatedly by Ush. If he is going to argue that the video doesn't show a 757, then what is he saying it is? What are you saying it is? And if something else hit the pentagon on 9/11...before th eplane hit, then why was this not part of the official story of that days events? Everyone keeps saying it was something, not a 757, but not a missle either, then what was it that hit the building, clearly, before flight 77? And if we're going to say it wasn't a 757, and it wasn't footage of flight 77, then on what occasion was the pentagon bombed, hit by a dildo or a fat person, that wasn't reported to the people of this country?

Originally posted by Ushgarak
If you are going to tell me the video doesn't prove a plane hit the Pentagon, then I agree, It doesn't show a damn thing. But nothing I have said has anything to do with that. Fact remains, there is plenty of evidence that it WAS a plane, none that it was a missile. That's the bottom line.

Who said something else hit the pentagon? I don't even get the point of the rest of this post.

The point Ush and I are making is that, while this particular video doesn't show evidence of the plane hitting the pentagon, there is OTHER sources that do show evidence. The video shows nothing clearly. Why? Because the framerate is shit, it's terrible quality.

Originally posted by WrathfulDwarf
Nice...what you taking as bait I see it as a pointless waste of any further time. I appreciate what NineCoronas did by doing some research. I leave you with this:

Popular Mechanics

I'm sure you've seen the magazine in stores shelves. Maybe if you bother to pick one up you'll be amaze. Have a good Day.

how cute 😊 a collection of pointless and childish jabs...but still cute. ok you have a good day too.

Originally posted by Deano
you are living in denial. i admit the truth is a bitter pill to swallow

yeah the truth is too frightening for him to swallow so he lives in denial on things like this about our government.as jack nicholson said in A FEW GOOD MEN-YOU CANT HANDLE THE TRUTH .that is so true about so many americans.

Originally posted by amity75
We've all heard the names of the passengers aboard the WTC planes and the Pennsylvania plane but what about the Pentagon plane? Does anyone know anyone who was on it? I remember listening to the radio at work on 9/11 and they quickly denied the pentagon had been hit and then retracted their
statement. I'm not a conspiracy buff by any means but there's something fishy going on here.

be careful now,besides government people,posters around here will call you a conspiracy nut if you dont blindly accept the governments lies and their official version. 🙄

Originally posted by Mr Parker
be careful now,besides government people,posters around here will call you a conspiracy nut if you dont accept the governments lies and thier official version. 🙄

True.

Originally posted by Mr Parker
be careful now,besides government people,posters around here will call you a conspiracy nut if you dont accept the governments lies and their official version. 🙄

Not accepting lies is fine, but most of the conspiracy theorists here don't accept the truth either. That's the problem. If the government's official version of events didn't come from them, but came from the net and some dodgy source, it would be fair game. Oddly.

I still don't get why conspiracy theorists believe the government is nothing more than a glorified knitting circle. They're not a group of gossiping crones. If they don't want the general public to know something, you won't know it. They are so lapse in secrecy that Joe Nobody can log onto the net and foil their plans.

I don't accept the government's lies as truth, but only a fool would believe everything they say is a lie, just because they do lie.

Conspiracy theorists don't accept lies, or truth. They accept the info given to them from certain sources and deny it from others, regardless of what it says.

-AC

Originally posted by WrathfulDwarf
Nice...what you taking as bait I see it as a pointless waste of any further time. I appreciate what NineCoronas did by doing some research. I leave you with this:

Popular Mechanics

I'm sure you've seen the magazine in stores shelves. Maybe if you bother to pick one up you'll be amaze. Have a good Day.

"'Beauty is truth, truth beauty,—that is all
Ye know on earth, and all ye need to know.'"

- Ode on a Grecian Urn, John Keats

The debate over what hit the Pentagon has thrived due to the contradiction between eyewitness reports and physical evidence. While a number of eyewitness reports indicate that a twin-engine jetliner exploded at or in front of the Pentagon, photographs of the damaged lawn show a near absence of aircraft debris, and photographs of the damaged facade do not show a pattern of damage consistent with the paths of the outer wings and vertical tail section.

...why, yes! I am just copying and pasting from another source.

Originally posted by Ya Krunk'd Floo
"'Beauty is truth, truth beauty,—that is all
Ye know on earth, and all ye need to know.'"

- Ode on a Grecian Urn, John Keats

Sorry, couldn't resist.....leaving now....

Originally posted by debbiejo
flower_girl

If Bardock can make love to a fish, can I get a blow-job from a flower?

I don't know, do have flowers outside your house???......go try and report back... 🙄

Have flowers, but no pretty eyes to destroy.

Originally posted by BackFire
Who said something else hit the pentagon? I don't even get the point of the rest of this post.

The point is that this is clearly a video of "something" hitting the pentagon. Is that point free of contention? Okay. The second point is, if this is a video of "something" hitting the pentagon, then what is it? And if "something" hit the pentagon that was not a 757, then on what other occasion did "something" hit the pentagon and blow up one of the walls?

So, if everyone agrees that this is video of "something" hitting the pentagon, what is it...and since it clearly isn't a boeing 757, why was this "something" not reported as part of teh events of that day? Even considering the skipping of the frames, looking at the first frame where the object is visible, it is clearly not the nose of a 757.