Dr McBeefington
Restricted
Originally posted by Stealth Moose
How the hell do I need to provide a source for Leviticus being stupid? You realize that it says you can't cut the hair at your temples, wear clothing from two different cloth types, touch swine's flesh, nor can you come near a woman if she's in period? Do I need to find a scholarly journal that agrees with my opinion on a source available to everyone?
No, because it's apparently stupid because you say it is. And your response is the reason I wrote this:
There's a reason we have the written torah and the oral torah. I never said I accept everything or anything in Leviticus, it's just that I find it amusing that those without any knowledge take a literal meaning and call it stupid.
This from the guy who off-handedly does this:
Amusing response from a guy who went on an Oprah like tirade that had nothing to do with anything
And this:
Which is supported by everyday daytime tv shows as well as political shows. Swing and a miss.
And this gem:
Yup, I said that the while cyberbullying and cyberbullying in response to homosexuality exists, the media tends to focus more on the homosexual issue as this is the hypersensitive issue of our country. Your response to this
fact was a paper indicating the cyberbullying of homosexuals and suicidal tendencies... Talk about gems.
So essentially, here's how you've supported your arguments:[list][*]Constitution Daily articles
[*]Cracked articles (Wait, no nvm)
[*]Completely refusing to acknowledge valid points by opposition; using your own assertions as self-supporting, but requiring some kind of objective proof from others; dismissing any such objective proof should it be presented; repeating assertion with new words.[/list]
As opposed to:
1. Quoting a source you didn't actually list so nobody had any idea what you were quoting.
2. Spinning your own logic from said source in order to come up with your desired conclusion
3. The hypocrisy of the bolded text is too funny to pass up, especially since that's the 3rd or 4th time you've been called out on it. Speaking of using own assertions as self supporting. This coming from a guy that calls leviticus stupid because "they say eating shrimp is bad!!"? LOL
Also, I made it clear that what I said about the black community was based on my experiences. Way to read Janus.
I bolded and then colored the text which showcases your amazing sophistry and inability to recognize common definitions in an effort to equally debate with other people to reach some kind of mutual conclusion.
Yes, and I mentioned to RH as much, your continual inability to follow simple logic. It's not my fault you're having time grasping such a simple concept.
In other words, you just spin-doctor the **** out of anything said that you don't agree with just so you can avoid actually defending your own half-assed arguments and somehow come away looking better. This is the last time I will address your points period, on RoK or here if you're going to insist on this one-sided debating style. [/B]
😆 😂
Dear lord, I call you out on your hypocrisy and spinning arguments to fit your own conclusions and you...Repeat me? Do us all a favor and don't address anybody's arguments because you'll waste less text and people will be less confused as to what you're talking about and what you're currently smoking, depending on your current tirade and inconsequential rebuttals. At least attempt to be objective instead of ranting on about someone else's supposed subjectivity. 😂 😂