The Battle Bar, Our Wretched Hive of Scum and Villainy

Started by psmith819923,287 pages

isn't that exactly what i said? Undergraduate education measures your ability to stick to a program or task for four to six years. So there's not much a Bachelors degree tells us about intelligence. However, University faculty is staffed not by undergraduates, but by doctorate holders. Thus, whatever we decide to say about DS's statement "most college professors are pseudo intellectuals" had better be true about doctorate holders.

There is plenty college can tell us. The students are out on their own, they get fed a bunch of bullshit (mostly, not all) to the point that they're brainwashed one way or the other, and they continue on that path getting their BS/BA. Once they get that, their arrogance expands and they go for a higher learning degree, while their ego continues to be inflated as their sense of entitlement balloons. This is just a generalization though and it obviously does not apply to everyone, just those with liberal arts degrees.


Now, if we examine the set of people who are doctorate holders, I submit that it will not be one populated by idiots.

Define idiots? I maintain you can have a higher degree and still be a clueless fart. A high school classmate of mine got his law degree in California, while his weak mind got brainwashed by California politics, and his response to my question of "Why do you like Obama so much" was a carefully rehearsed "Oh you just don't like Obama because you're racist!" See? He has a law degree which is not at ALL easy to do, yet he's still a moron. Was Ben Bernanke smart just because he was FED chairman? Is Nancy Pelosi smart? I guess it would come down to book smarts vs. street smarts and common sense.

Pseudo intellectuals are insecure people who want others to know that they can engage in mental masturbation and recite a bunch of meaningless statistics, while attempting to push their brainwashing on others. They can't hold ground in any form of intellectual debates because they only hang around their kind and are not used to disagreement, nor conflict. RH you aren't a pseudo intellectual. At times Nai pisses me off when he nitpicks with his corrections but he's really reduced that nonsense over the years.

Originally posted by psmith81992
There is plenty college can tell us. The students are out on their own, they get fed a bunch of bullshit (mostly, not all) to the point that they're brainwashed one way or the other, and they continue on that path getting their BS/BA. This is just a generalization though and it obviously does not apply to everyone, just those with liberal arts degrees.

Not philosophy students. Not only are you strongly encouraged to be critical and independant as a philosophy student, but you are largely evaluated on that criteria.

Philosophy students are the prime example of what I'm talking about. They equate philosophy with intelligence, then they try it out on other people and in every day life. Nothing destroys the credibility of philosophy classes like trying to disprove religion. I had the fortune(misfortune?) of taking a philosophy class that dedicated a whole damn month to trying to disprove religion, and it was some of the dumbest shit I've ever heard. But hey these impressionable retards felt special for being in a philosophy class and thought they were geniuses, so who was I to tell them otherwise? An intro to logic class was MUCH better. I actually loved it.

Also http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/03/06/navy-destroyer-heading-to-black-sea-as-us-fighter-jets-land-in-lithuania/

Who says Obama doesn't have balls when it comes to foreign policy?

Originally posted by psmith81992
Philosophy students are the prime example of what I'm talking about. They equate philosophy with intelligence, then they try it out on other people and in every day life. Nothing destroys the credibility of philosophy classes like trying to disprove religion. I had the fortune(misfortune?) of taking a philosophy class that dedicated a whole damn month to trying to disprove religion, and it was some of the dumbest shit I've ever heard. But hey these impressionable retards felt special for being in a philosophy class and thought they were geniuses, so who was I to tell them otherwise? An intro to logic class was MUCH better. I actually loved it.

Originally posted by psmith81992
Philosophy students are the prime example of what I'm talking about. They equate philosophy with intelligence, then they try it out on other people and in every day life. Nothing destroys the credibility of philosophy classes like trying to disprove religion. I had the fortune(misfortune?) of taking a philosophy class that dedicated a whole damn month to trying to disprove religion, and it was some of the dumbest shit I've ever heard. But hey these impressionable retards felt special for being in a philosophy class and thought they were geniuses, so who was I to tell them otherwise? An intro to logic class was MUCH better. I actually loved it.

Also http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/03/06/navy-destroyer-heading-to-black-sea-as-us-fighter-jets-land-in-lithuania/

Who says Obama doesn't have balls when it comes to foreign policy?

Maybe you're just not very smart and are railing against what you perceive as pseudo-intellectuals to compensate for your own intellectual inadequacy?

Originally posted by Astor Ebligis
Well it might not be for everyone, or every kind of reading, but it's definitely a smart idea that has uses. I'd personally be using it right away for things like news articles.

Most news articles IMO aren't really long enough to justify its use, but yeah, if you just want to learn the details of the text then it can probably come in handy.

Really hard to know for sure until you start using it yourself and get used to doing so.

You can still appreciate the language, you just have to do it from short term memory while you process the text.

Plus, there's always the option of combining this with the basic text as well, and being able to switch back and forth between them (if you want to observe a passage more closely for example).

That sounds far too tedious IMHO, if I have to go back and reread segments of it anyway (Thus slowing the reading down), then what is the point?

I may try it out in the future, but personally, I can only see myself reading a text book in this way. A novel or an epic requires more careful reading to appreciate the language.

Edit: Now that it's no longer seven in the morning I am admittedly better able to follow even the 500 wpm text.

Originally posted by NemeBro
Maybe you're just not very smart and are railing against what you perceive as pseudo-intellectuals to compensate for your own intellectual inadequacy?

Nope, nice try with the "no u" comeback, though!

How ironic.

For what it's worth, I'm sorry that a college professor raped you when you were a child.

YouTube video

Holy shit!

Originally posted by Stealth Moose
You could argue that fear of imminent death is traumatic, but once the individual expires, who knows if the trauma is enduring?

It all seems rather subjective. There's intellectual power-houses in big name universities, technical colleges, and doing crossword puzzles in between shifts at Wal-mart. Formal education is not a measurement of intelligence in any case.

True, but this is circumstantial. One may fear imminent death while a hammer from their murderer comes down on their head. One may not whilst wishing it for to come on a hospital bed due to a terminal illness.

As for the second portion of your sentence? Who really knows? My perception and understanding, if you can call it that, of death is heavily based on an assumption. A reasonable one, of course, but one nonetheless.

God Damnit I would give my left nut for Eva green

You're into French chicks with Kubrick stares?

After watching this movie? And bloodlust. Hell yes

Hrm. I might see it then.

Much better fight scenes than the previous movie but the acting wasn't as good without Fassbender and Butler. But oh man, Eva Green.

So in the new Yoda arc:

Spoiler:
Yoda confronts an illusion/spirit of Bane (who looks entirely different than he should BTW) and utterly stomps him. He also tools some other spirits that create a monster that look sorta like the corrupted boar god from Princess Mononoke.

What is this show you keep talking about?

It sounds like a love letter to movie fans at the expense of EU.

Not even close, really.

Just admit that you love wank as long as it's pro-EU and anti-movie.

I'm starting the final arc proper. Ares, what did you think of the whole thing?