When your federal government is incompetent..Leave it to the states.
http://zodiac-signs-astrology.com/zodiac-signs/scorpio.htm
Pretty accurate for the most part.
But honestly I think Frank Underwood would be like the definition of a "bad" Scorpio, lol.
Originally posted by psmith81992You mean terrorist states like Saudi Arabia and Pakistan?
No, killing thousands would be better and allowing terrorist states ANY kind of nuclear capabilities..
The democrats pulled the same crap with Bush. It goes both ways. Start with Iran. If you're going to have Iran think they'll have nuclear capabilities at SOME point, the very least you can do is tell them to acknowledge the existence of Israel, or no deal. Bush may have been incompetent but I'll be damned if the rest of the uncivilized world doesn't think we're a bunch of pussies at this point.You've... still yet to provide a salient plan for defeating ISIS and preventing Iran from getting nuclear weapons. Drone strikes and the training/arming of Iraqi soldiers are already things the Obama administration is either doing or has openly stated their intention of doing.More drone strikes, more soldiers training soldiers in the middle east, not meddling in voting in Israel while pretending you support your biggest middle eastern ally. I suppose that's his one biggest fault. Don't pretend you care about Israel and then try to sway their votes because it makes you look like a jackass. I don't even know what to make of the Cuban situation. The cubans here and there think its amusing from what I understand. Obama kinda reminds me of Californians. He does thinks differently for difference sake because in his mind, any kind of change equates to progress (it doesn't). I don't really think he's incompetent but I just think he's completely out of his element. [/B]
There is no such thing as an entirely unbiased news source- however thinking that that means "well I guess every news source is equally credible lol" is idiotic. You should be at least somewhat skeptical of every news source, but some are objectively worse than others, and deserve more skepticism than others.
You mean terrorist states like Saudi Arabia and Pakistan?
You've... still yet to provide a salient plan for defeating ISIS and preventing Iran from getting nuclear weapons. Drone strikes and the training/arming of Iraqi soldiers are already things the Obama administration is either doing or has openly stated their intention of doing.
Or we can do what we did to Germany after WWII which is constant world surveillance. I believe they're never again allowed to have an army over an X amount of people and certain type of weapons (it's 7am I'm not checking this shit).
Take your penis- envy elsewhere, small son; I'm not telling you to keep your opinion on the subject to yourself, I'm asking you to provide an alternative to the strategy that you clearly hold in contempt (that of the Obama Administration). If you don't have one that's fine, I don't really know what to do either. ISIS and organizations like ISIS are a problem with no simple solution .
I clicked on your link and was immediately assaulted with a pop-up that reads: "Do you thank God that Bibi won the election? Get the Thank God for Bibi shirt here! Buy now!" I hate you.
You don't seriously believe that Iran is " THE biggest terrorist state on the planet" though, do you? I mean, **** man, something like 90% of the 9/11 terrorists were Saudis, and Pakistan all but hid Bin Laden's location from us. That's not 90's shit bro. As far as governments go Iran is arguably one of the most stable in the ME. These are the cats who held peace-rallies with thousands of people yelling "God Bless America" after 9/11.
Originally posted by Tzeentch
There is no such thing as an entirely unbiased news source- however thinking that that means "well I guess every news source is equally credible lol" is idiotic. You should be at least somewhat skeptical of every news source, but some are objectively worse than others, and deserve more skepticism than others.
Take your penis- envy elsewhere, small son; I'm not telling you to keep your opinion on the subject to yourself, I'm asking you to provide an alternative to the strategy that you clearly hold in contempt (that of the Obama Administration). If you don't have one that's fine, I don't really know what to do either. ISIS and organizations like ISIS are a problem with no simple solution .
You don't seriously believe that Iran is " THE biggest terrorist state on the planet" though, do you? I mean, **** man, something like 90% of the 9/11 terrorists were Saudis, and Pakistan all but hid Bin Laden's location from us. That's not 90's shit bro. As far as governments go Iran is arguably one of the most stable in the ME. These are the cats who held peace-rallies with thousands of people yelling "God Bless America" after 9/11.
As far as concessions go, Obama could have simply asked Iran to recognize Israel as a state. Just that one concession and so many people would have been happier or a little less pissed off. He couldn't be bothered to do that. It's more important for him to establish some kind of peace with Iran and Cuba than to recognize his biggest ally. This is where he fails in terms of foreign policy.
Downtime in between killing terrorists.