The Battle Bar, Our Wretched Hive of Scum and Villainy

Started by Syndicate3,287 pages

Originally posted by The_Tempest
Perhaps the longer I stay away, the more traction you'll get. But it seems even now Sheevism is still dominant, despite the absence of its most ardent supporters and the presence of SWTOR's best and brightest.

I'll have to check in in another month mmm

My servant, Syndicate, keep me appraised.

Yes sir. I'll do what I can to stem the flow of SWTORism.

Originally posted by FreshestSlice
No, what I want is the death. Of all things.

Well Clemson and the Panthers are a good start oooooh roasted

Spoiler:
I agree though, why freaking bother? I have too many crazes. I'm over Elder Scrolls and Star Wars atm, but I know I'll be back.
Originally posted by FreshestSlice
No, what I want is the death. Of all things.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nDilrcV2Zqc

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FrlymHW0qU8

Originally posted by Syndicate
Yes sir. I'll do what I can to stem the flow of SWTORism.

Oh please.

Originally posted by XSUPREMEXSKILLZ
Oh please.

I already have some good arguments in place after talking with Ant. :3

No, you don't.

No one that high on Bane Kool-Aid will stop anything. Ever.

Fresh, you're in college. You take adderall, right?

Hell no.

Originally posted by XSUPREMEXSKILLZ
No, you don't.

Of course I do. The accolade wank of course I can just dismiss because they're accolades. HoT being stomped by Arcann also makes my cause much easier. Satele's already in the gutters. Most people don't actually know about Aryn's best feats. I can use the strike team dismissal argument for Malgus, Vitiate I have no idea as of yet but I'm sure there's something. As for the rest of SWTOR nobody gives a **** enough to use them aside from as one offs.

1. Dismissing accolades is not an argument.

2. A bunch of arguments you assert to possess, (which are just recycled arguments) is not an argument.

@Fresh, that's a strong answer. Got something against it?

Well that's true enough. More of a tactic then.

Recycled arguments aren't actual arguments? 😛

Originally posted by XSUPREMEXSKILLZ
@Fresh, that's a strong answer. Got something against it?

Not really. For myself, however, I don't like being dependent on anything but myself and my parent's bank account.

1. A highly illogical tactic, as far as fictional universes are concerned.

2. Where did I say recycled arguments aren't actual arguments?

Originally posted by FreshestSlice
Not really. For myself, however, I don't like being dependent on anything but myself and my parent's bank account.

Who said you'd have to depend on it to use it?

Originally posted by XSUPREMEXSKILLZ
1. A highly illogical tactic, as far as fictional universes are concerned.

2. Where did I say recycled arguments aren't actual arguments?

Well personally I go about it only when the accolade is unsubstantiated.

In the post before the one I'm quoting right now.

It's a drug, SKILLZ. Like any drug, continued use leads to dependence. I had to do more than my share of papers on the topic.

1. Hardly does anything to really counter TOR, then.

2. Read it again and get back to me.

Originally posted by FreshestSlice
It's a drug, SKILLZ. Like any drug, continued use leads to dependence. I had to do more than my share of papers on the topic.

Yes, but while not dependent on the drug it's rather easy to start and stick to using it with moderation. An example would be weed: I have a group of friends who smoke it once a month, (though admittedly I've never smoked it,) and sometimes go multiple months without smoking it. Then there's quan, who uses adderall like, 2 to 3 times a year. It's essentially called going in without being an idiot. And I'd like to think you're not one of those.