I mean, Montana's team was stacked to the brim, while Mr. Terrific has played with so many different faces, and teams it's almost a crime.
Yet, Brady not only has just as many rings, but made it to the big game two more times than Montana did. He has a better win percentage, superior seasons, etc, etc. Montana only really has him beat in clutch, and even then Brady wrecking of the LoB in the forth of his latest SB win --- is something Rodgers, Brees, and Peyton couldn't do despite having, like, a combined 8 tries to do so?
Originally posted by Deronn_solo
Possible. But I doubt, it, kek. However, Brady is the best QB in terms of intangibles, Rodgers by tangibles.Everyone else fights for the others spots, tbh.
Brady has a history of going super saiyan after he gets pissed.
Then again, he's like 39 years old. At some point he's going to drop, and from precedent it'll probably be really suddenly. But it might not be this year.
Originally posted by The Ellimist
Brady has a history of going super saiyan after he gets pissed.Then again, he's like 39 years old. At some point he's going to drop, and from precedent it'll probably be really suddenly. But it might not be this year.
True.
Honestly, I hate Brady's guts, but I want him to continue his dominance. Him, and Bress, are, like, the last of the awesome generations of QB's I grew up with.
Yeah, which I detail under "clutch".
Regardless, Brady's playoff stats aren't too shabby himself (leads in wins, yards, TD's, etc), and he's 4-2 and counting in the Superbowl. Dunno how losing before you reach the big game, is better than reaching it, and losing. That logic always has --- and always will be --- retarded to me.
That he was dominating the NBA as a 19 year old kid, lived up to the absolutely ludicrous expectations he had, has comparable stats to Jordan, is better at doing more with less, and has actually overachieved in the Finals.
Not that Jordan isn't > Lebron. I'm just saying there's a lot of players where, "a case can be made," but Montana still has the best case.
Literally, Montana's only case is clutch, and 4-0. Brady is also hella clutch, just as many rings, more Superbowl appearances, done more with less, and didn't have the benefit of playing with a truly innovative offense the league never seen before at that point in time, and he had stacked team that won, even after they traded him away. Brady can also run an offense like, very few QB's, if any, sans Manning.
So yeah, Montana's hold on the number 1 spot isn't strong at all, kek.
That he was dominating the NBA as a 19 year old kid, lived up to the absolutely ludicrous expectations he had, has comparable stats to Jordan, is better at doing more with less, and has actually overachieved in the Finals.