The Battle Bar, Our Wretched Hive of Scum and Villainy

Started by Publius II3,287 pages

Originally posted by Darth Sexy
Yo Faunus I'll get to your argument a little later. My mind is fried once again..
We haven't really made any progress in the past page or two. I say we just let this one sit for a while.

Originally posted by SIDIOUS 66
Ha! Ha! I know i just reread it. But i am sure you know what i meant by now.
I really don't, but I could definitely put a sexist spin on it.

Edit

Edit: Jesus, my bad.

Originally posted by Publius II
We haven't really made any progress in the past page or two. I say we just let this one sit for a while.

I really don't, but I could definitely put a sexist spin on it.

We can debate this on aim or something in a non homosexual way because I'd rather us agree or disagree on something rather than go around in circles and waste bandwidth. And no, I don't agree to disagree.

I really don't, but I could definitely put a sexist spin on it.
Well anal sex is very unsanitary. So if anyone one is willing to do that, i could only imagine other filthy things they are willing to do.

I mean seriously, would you want someone cooking your food that just got done having butt-sex?

Not only that but what the hell is the point? A female has plenty of other crevices to explore. Now if you're trying to shtoop another guy, you better be damn sure you know what state you're living in.

Originally posted by SIDIOUS 66
Well anal sex is very unsanitary. So if anyone one is willing to do that, i could only imagine other filthy things they are willing to do.

I mean seriously, would you want someone cooking your food that just got done having butt-sex?

I cannot imagine other filthy things. Guess I'm not good at thinking out of the box (no pun intented).

Originally posted by SIDIOUS 66
Well anal sex is very unsanitary. So if anyone one is willing to do that, i could only imagine other filthy things they are willing to do.

I mean seriously, would you want someone cooking your food that just got done having butt-sex?

Is she cooking the food with her butt? Cuz then I'd have a problem with it.

Originally posted by Lord Lucien
Is she cooking the food with her butt? Cuz then I'd have a problem with it.

That would be quite a skill though. Something you should not forgot to put on your resumé.

Originally posted by SIDIOUS 66
Well anal sex is very unsanitary. So if anyone one is willing to do that, i could only imagine other filthy things they are willing to do.

I mean seriously, would you want someone cooking your food that just got done having butt-sex?

I don't even know what to say to you after this. I'm simply staggered by the raw stupidity of the comment. I read and reread it three times to make sure I didn't miss something massive, but seriously. Holy shit [no pun intended].

I just lost all respect I ever had for you.

Originally posted by Darth Sexy
Not only that but what the hell is the point? A female has plenty of other crevices to explore.
I can think of two, excluding hands, feet, and sensory-inclined orifices. If you're seriously referring to the latter, I can probably Google you a few fantastic therapists.

EDIT: Given the topic of Blax's most recent poetry, he better have something to say about this, too.

Originally posted by Publius II
I don't even know what to say to you after this. I'm simply staggered by the raw stupidity of the comment. I read and reread it three times to make sure I didn't miss something massive, but seriously. Holy shit [no pun intended].

I just lost all respect I ever had for you.

I can think of two, excluding hands, feet, and sensory-inclined orifices. If you're seriously referring to the latter, I can probably Google you a few fantastic therapists.

EDIT: Given the topic of Blax's most recent poetry, he better have something to say about this, too.

Then you, my friend, have had more "enlightening" experiences in your life than myself.

I don't even know what to say to you after this. I'm simply staggered by the raw stupidity of the comment. I read and reread it three times to make sure I didn't miss something massive, but seriously. Holy shit [no pun intended].

I just lost all respect I ever had for you.

There is nothing stupid with what i said. I would never stick anything from my body up someone's ass. Nature did not intend for that. That is why gays will never have any kids, because it was not intended to be that way.

You probably think i have a hatred towards gays, but i don't. I even have some gay friends, but their actions are not something i find natural. Whatever someone does in their room is their business.

I do think it is unfair for gay couples to adopt. It is unfair to the children.

Originally posted by SIDIOUS 66
There is nothing stupid with what i said. I would never stick anything from my body up someone's ass. Nature did not intend for that. That is why gays will never have any kids, because it was not intended to be that way.

You probably think i have a hatred towards gays, but i don't. I even have some gay friends, but their actions are not something i find natural. Whatever someone does in their room is their business.

I do think it is unfair for gay couples to adopt. It is unfair to the children.

You think it is unfair for gay couples to adopt ... are you freaking kidding me ? Do you even know how large the number of gay people is, and do you honestly think all these people should not go through the experience of raising children, watching them grow up and continue their name. What if someone told you, you weren't allowed to have kids because it's 'unfair'.

Don't say stuff like it's not natural, who are we to decide what's natural. And don't say something like nature didn't intend for that, nature didn't intend for a lot of stuff we do like forests we aren't supposed to destroy or a certain ozon layer we aren't supposed to destroy and we aren't even supposed to go in outer space because clearly nature blocked that out by not allowing oxygen to get there, but still we do all those stuff. Times change. If gays werent allowed to have kids why would nature even allow so many to be born (with a desire to raise 'm), that's just a cruel joke. I don't like anal sex, but who cares if they do, it's not like anyone gets harmed by it.

I know a gay couple who has kids, and those kids are awesome and do not mind they were adopted or raised by 2 guys.

I know a guy who's been raised by two women for thirteen years, as well. He's a perfectly normal person.

Anti-gay idealists don't have a single case.

The idea that a gay marriage wrecks traditional family values is pointless because there are gay couples who have adopted and have, for the most part, completely natural families.

But then again, blacks shouldn't be married either, or be allowed to vote.

Blacks aren't people, right? It's unnatural. At least, that was the mindset for many years. 🙂

Originally posted by Final Blaxican
I know a guy who's been raised by two women for thirteen years, as well. He's a perfectly normal person.

Anti-gay idealists don't have a single case.

Says the one who states the exception to the rule. Are you telling me that a child is better off with same sex parents rather than a mother and a father? That's hilarious. I do not agree with adoption for same sex couples but it's also not illegal, so I don't feel so strongly about it as to change the rules. But as for anti gay proponents not having a single case? They have more than homosexual idealists.

Originally posted by Slash_KMC
[B]You think it is unfair for gay couples to adopt ... are you freaking kidding me ? Do you even know how large the number of gay people is, and do you honestly think all these people should not go through the experience of raising children, watching them grow up and continue their name. What if someone told you, you weren't allowed to have kids because it's 'unfair'.

You think telling someone they can't have kids because its unfair is the same thing as two same sex people CHOOSING their paths and as a result, are unable to have kids? Terrible comparison.

Don't say stuff like it's not natural, who are we to decide what's natural. And don't say something like nature didn't intend for that, nature didn't intend for a lot of stuff we do like forests we aren't supposed to destroy or a certain ozon layer we aren't supposed to destroy and we aren't even supposed to go in outer space because clearly nature blocked that out by not allowing oxygen to get there, but still we do all those stuff. Times change. If gays werent allowed to have kids why would nature even allow so many to be born (with a desire to raise 'm), that's just a cruel joke. I don't like anal sex, but who cares if they do, it's not like anyone gets harmed by it.

Jesus, not this bullshit liberal argument again. That is the dumbest thing I've ever heard. It starts with "who are we..." and ends with some retarded nonsense. Who are we to stop the nazis from massacring Jews? Who are we to stop the Soviet Empire? Who are we....I guess NOBODY has the right to question ANYTHING, so EVERYTHING should be allowed because after all, who are we to say or do anything?

Did I say better off? Nigga please.

However, there seems to be a lot of exceptions to this "rule".

Where's the indominitable completely conclusive research that says that the majority of children raised by gays are inferior to ones raised by traditional hetero families?

I do not agree with adoption for same sex couples but it's also not illegal, so I don't feel so strongly about it as to change the rules

A black man could be shot for being seen kissing a white women back in the day. It was illegal under the guise of it being "unnatural and, ultimately, harmful to both parties. 🙂

Sids, I get the feeling you've never 'stuck anything from your body' up anyone body...

I would as how you know what nature intended but then I remember how you are omnipotent and all... wait. That isn't you at all, is it?
("Intended to be that way"? What? Who intended what now?)

I've gotta say, also, that you aren't in a position to determine what is and isn't natural (because if it exists it is natural. End of story.) and that whatever you find 'natural' might not be what I find natural or what the witch down the street does. I'm sorry that not everyone has the decency to believe what you do (I know! How dare we!) but you can't force your prudish conventions on others.

About the adoption? What is unfair for children is prohibiting them from going to a loving home- institutionalizing children or shuffling them from place to place does far more severe, lasting harm to a developing psyche than having 2 moms.

I don't quite see the argument for why a child "needs to have a mom and a dad", considering the divorce rate is higher then ever and more and more people have been growing up in women only households or men only households. My family for the last five generations has been raised by single parents, I'm not the only one. Are all of us messed up?

Originally posted by Final Blaxican
Did I say better off? Nigga please.

However, there seems to be a lot of exceptions to this "rule".

Where's the indominitable completely conclusive research that says that the majority of children raised by gays are inferior to ones raised by traditional hetero families?

A black man could be shot for being seen kissing a white women back in the day. It was illegal under the guise of it being "unnatural and, ultimately, harmful to both parties. 🙂

I love the comparison. There's a reason why the country was divided in terms of racism. Hating innocent people is wrong. There's no benefits to it. I've read many studies on the issues kids have and can have with same sex parents. Obviously there are exceptions but there is absolutely nothing beneficial to the child concerning having same sex parents.