Any Gary Johnson Supporters on KMC?
What a fruitcake. His poll numbers are single digits, but that’s way too high. He should have trouble scraping together the support of fifty gaypedoface voters.
Trump is right not to even mention this dope’s name. He’s a self-discrediting circus sideshow freak. But I wonder to whom his votes will go on election day, because libertardian voters always abandon the official Libertardian Candidate at crunch time. My guess is most of Fruitcake’s voters stay home to savor a day-long pot bender, or split their votes between Trump and thecunt.
Originally posted by Ziggystardust
Any Gary Johnson Supporters on KMC?What a fruitcake. His poll numbers are single digits, but that’s way too high. He should have trouble scraping together the support of fifty gaypedoface voters.
Trump is right not to even mention this dope’s name. He’s a self-discrediting circus sideshow freak. But I wonder to whom his votes will go on election day, because libertardian voters always abandon the official Libertardian Candidate at crunch time. My guess is most of Fruitcake’s voters stay home to savor a day-long pot bender, or split their votes between Trump and thecunt.
I wish the dark side and light side dichotomy was more of a conflict between egoism and altruism. A Sith would be someone who emphasized hedonism and personal power. I can imagine a Sith in the vein of Andrew Ryan; someone who preaches self-reliance and a desire for power that's couched in the language of personal enrichment. Not so much a Social Darwinist, but exalting the individual will at the expense of everything else.
As it stands, all Sith are the same. Dull, cruel without purpose, pointlessly sadistic. There's nothing seductive about that, nothing interesting. The best villains are the ones who sound convincing, where a part of you says "maybe he has a point." Suddenly, you blink and realize how far down the rabbit hole you've gone. When the Sith are just miniature versions of the Hulk, there is no depth. Chaotic Stupid can only go so far.
Originally posted by Lucius
I wish the dark side and light side dichotomy was more of a conflict between egoism and altruism. A Sith would be someone who emphasized hedonism and personal power. I can imagine a Sith in the vein of Andrew Ryan; someone who preaches self-reliance and a desire for power that's couched in the language of personal enrichment. Not so much a Social Darwinist, but exalting the individual will at the expense of everything else.As it stands, all Sith are the same. Dull, cruel without purpose, pointlessly sadistic. There's nothing seductive about that, nothing interesting. The best villains are the ones who sound convincing, where a part of you says "maybe he has a point." Suddenly, you blink and realize how far down the rabbit hole you've gone. When the Sith are just miniature versions of the Hulk, there is no depth. Chaotic Stupid can only go so far.
I don't disagree with your proposal, but I think you also have to demonstrate {for storytelling and continuity concerns} that the dark side is not something that can be used casually and without consequence. It's inherently corruptive and I don't think anyone who uses it should be immune to its deleterious effects.