The Battle Bar, Our Wretched Hive of Scum and Villainy

Started by Zampanó3,287 pages

Director sent out a new letter, internally, to FBI Employees:

The FBI doesn't have any idea what value the new evidence might offer to the Clinton investigation. It is a single lead, that is of unclear connection to the existing case. (Unclear because the entire media sphere erupted without any indication about the nature or quality of the new emails.) More importantly than the media's enthusiasm to resurrect this non-story, the FBI director's decision to notify Congress was not consistent with department policy. One DOJ official said that "we don’t comment on an ongoing investigation."

The succinct version of my position is here:

Michael Vatis, a former senior Justice Department official who is now a partner at Steptoe & Johnson, said Comey was probably trying to be transparent. But “transparency is not the foremost value in investigations. Fairness is,” he said.

“His statement has, quite predictably, been blown out of proportion and twisted into a signifier of some momentous discovery, when in fact, the new emails may turn out to reveal nothing new at all,” he said. “That’s not fair to Clinton.”

tl;dr: Clinton's ****ed. Zamp's upset over her failures.

Originally posted by Zampanó
Director sent out a new letter, internally, to FBI Employees:

The FBI doesn't have any idea what value the new evidence might offer to the Clinton investigation. It is a single lead, that is of unclear connection to the existing case. (Unclear because the entire media sphere erupted without any indication about the nature or quality of the new emails.) More importantly than the media's enthusiasm to resurrect this non-story, the FBI director's decision to notify Congress was not consistent with department policy. One DOJ official said that "we don’t comment on an ongoing investigation."

The succinct version of my position is here:

Keep crying, your tears are delicious.

Ant pls stop texting me.

Why the **** does he have your phone number and I don't? 😠

Originally posted by Surtur
At the end of the day, shit has changed though. People can point out it wasn't technically reopened, but that is irrelevant though. Just the fact they are examining more evidence is the point.

Ok...so? They found new alleged evidence, but have no idea whether the evidence is actually relevant or not. This is the same guilty-until-proven-innocent mentality you accuse "SWJ's" of having (notice the trend here?)

Originally posted by Fated Xtasy
Why the **** does he have your phone number and I don't? 😠
lololol, he's actually pming me, its gross. 🙂

Originally posted by Fated Xtasy
Why the **** does he have your phone number and I don't? 😠
Why would anyone want Beni's phone number is the real question.

Originally posted by Beniboybling
I can't wait until this election thing is over. 😬

Ikr. At the end ya gurl gon be like:

Originally posted by Fated Xtasy
Ikr. At the end ya gurl gon be like:

Originally posted by Sinious
Why would anyone want Beni's phone number is the real question.

😂

Originally posted by Sinious
Why would anyone want Beni's phone number is the real question.

People that don't hold grudges.

Originally posted by Beniboybling

Originally posted by The Ellimist
Ok...so? They found new alleged evidence, but have no idea whether the evidence is actually relevant or not. This is the same guilty-until-proven-innocent mentality you accuse "SWJ's" of having (notice the trend here?)

It is. But the FBI themselves didn't say it was new evidence, they said they were taking a closer look at it. I doubt Clinton is "****ed" however. Her fanbase already came to terms with her being shady as ****.

On top of being a warmonger

clinton has been through every scandal that the far right has thrown at her. she will fight through this just watch.

The "far-right" isn't throwing scandals at Hillary Clinton. She, and her campaign, are committing scandalous behavior. Though given the quote you have in your sig, I guess it's not surprising that you can't tell the difference.

Originally posted by FreshestSlice
The "far-right" isn't throwing scandals at Hillary Clinton. She, and her campaign, are committing scandalous behavior. Though given the quote you have in your sig, I guess it's not surprising that you can't tell the difference.
right.... you obviously don't know much about hillary's past. the republicans have been trying to destroy her for years and tried to blow scandals way out of proportion. they even exposed themselves lmao.

http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/gop-leader-accidentally-tells-the-truth-about-benghazi-committee

the emails thing is the same.... all screaming that hillary is guilty and trying to smear her and then the fbi cleared her. they may be looking into it now but i bet they won't find anything... just like before.

Originally posted by carthage
On top of being a warmonger

Let's not pretend Trump is a pacifist.

Okay. What did that have to do with what I said? Clinton shouldn't be committing crimes if she doesn't want people to talk about them. It's that simple. Just like if Bill Clinton doesn't want to be called a rapist, he shouldn't have sex with 12 year olds.

Originally posted by FreshestSlice
Okay. What did that have to do with what I said? Clinton shouldn't be committing crimes if she doesn't want people to talk about them. It's that simple. Just like if Bill Clinton doesn't want to be called a rapist, he shouldn't have sex with 12 year olds.
can you show me where hillary was officially convicted of a crime and sent to prison? until then, let's stop smearing hillary unnecessarily and demonizing her. same with the bill clinton accusation you just levied..... pretty sure he was never convicted of that either. a conviction doesn't exactly seem to be on the horizon for either bill or hillary at the moment..... so until then:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presumption_of_innocence

you far right types seem to conveniently forget about this.....