The Battle Bar, Our Wretched Hive of Scum and Villainy

You are attacked because of your shit tier Galen wanking not because of the effort 🙂

Didn't see that coming.

Apparently it's still not bad enough for you to successfully counter. 🙂

I have, several times. You putting your head in the sand and refusing to budge doesn't change the fact that your argument is shit.

Originally posted by cs_zoltan
I have, several times.

Lmao.

Claiming that all cut scenes are canon even when they contradict each other isn't a successful counter sorry to say.

Skillz: Beerus vs Omega Shenron --- who wins?

Originally posted by UCanShootMyNova
Lmao.

Claiming that all cut scenes are canon even when they contradict each other isn't a successful counter sorry to say.

Well they are all canon, and your definition of contradict is as retarded as they come.

Originally posted by Tzeentch
How did Mail survive being cut in half and falling down a bottomless shaft while Qui-Gon died minutes after getting stabbed once in the gut?

Originally posted by cs_zoltan
Well they are all canon, and your definition of contradict is as retarded as they come.

Yeah, you're right. The dictionary is pretty retarded compared to your view.

con·tra·dict
ˌkäntrəˈdikt/Submit
verb
be in conflict with.

synonyms: be in conflict with, be at odds with, be at variance with, be inconsistent with, run counter to, disagree with
"this research contradicts previous assertions"

Yes, but there's just tiny little problem with that.

That's not how canon works, sorry.

I'm aware of how the old canon worked, thanks.

The old canon policy would consider each of SWTOR classes Outlander story path under C canon yet nobody takes the idea that a non force user could overcome Arcann with a blaster seriously and we're all aware that only one of the classes story paths can actually be true.

It's intellectually dishonest to argue off of that basis just like it is to abuse the inconsistency of the TFU cut scenes of the different versions which allow you to essentially argue any position you like. We have a consistent and descriptive narrative via the novel which is what should be used or if not then at least pick a single game version. Don't use multiple contradictory sources to support your point.

Dark Side and Light Side options show what would happen under different circumstances, not a parallel universe. There's no contradiction.

We're not discussing lightside and darkside options but thanks for your imput.

Regardless though there's no impetus for the darkside endings of certain games ( the TFU franchise in particular ) to show an accurate version of events as it's not apart of the main storyline and their main reasons for even existing are to help sell more copies of the game by creating the basis for DLC's which exist as further content.

They obviously don't care about consistency within the DLC themselves given they have things like Spirit Obi Wan engaging Starkiller in a lightsaber duel.

The funny thing ILS that he isn't talking about light/dark side cutscenes, but the PC and Wii versions.

Originally posted by UCanShootMyNova
Their main reasons for even existing are to help sell more copies of the game by creating the basis for DLC's which exist as further content.

LMAO.

Sounds a lot like my old anti-blurb arguments you used to shit on. 😂

And the handheld.

Personally if you're going to argue based off all the game versions then you should at least use the game guide where it states confirmed events from multiple game versions. It would at least give you some consistency.

Yet I see some using those same DS cutscenes for Kotor and Kotor 2 soo...those are allowed, yet TFU ones are not?

I get the Obi-Wan spirit not being that, but others?

Originally posted by Deronn_solo
LMAO.

Sounds a lot like my old anti-blurb arguments you used to shit on. 😂

My stance on blurbs is that they're true until proven false and as long as they have some evidence backing them up. I.E. Caedus performing Vader tier Force feats before his prime and demonstrating superior augmentation later. Same goes for Plagueis's unbalancing of the Force with Sidious.

If my ONLY basis was that they existed to sell then I'd still have to take it as valid but that in conjunction with the creators blatantly not caring about consistency with the rest of the EU in these DLC's allows me to dismiss it just like blurbs that are blatantly false like for some of the Bane novels.

Originally posted by Zenwolf
Yet I see some using those same DS cutscenes for Kotor and Kotor 2 soo...those are allowed, yet TFU ones are not?

I get the Obi-Wan spirit not being that, but others?

The only ones who consistently do this are Anakin wankers and KOTOR II wankers. Both of these groups and their actions disgust me and I do not condone them.

Originally posted by UCanShootMyNova
Personally if you're going to argue based off all the game versions then you should at least use the game guide where it states confirmed events from multiple game versions. It would at least give you some consistency.

I have, and it confirms Vader ragdolled the shit out of Starkiller 🙂

It also confirms that Starkiller accomplished several feats prior to their fight that Vader's never even dreamed of performing. Feats on a similar scale to the one that left Galen Marek exhausted ( directing the descent of a Star Destroyer ).

Context is a b!tch for people like you isn't it?